Thursday, September 25, 2025

Nazis of San Dieguito Academy

Coast News:

The San Dieguito Union High School District is addressing an incident from the end of the previous school year in which students allegedly made the shape of a swastika on a field at San Dieguito Academy, with reports that the school’s principal has been placed on administrative leave.

In a Sept. 18 statement, SDUHSD Superintendent Anne Staffieri said that in May, a group of students used their bodies to create the formation of a swastika. The image was seen and captured by a Jewish student while flying a plane overhead at the time.

While the student’s family reported the incident to school administrators that same day, district leaders said it was not brought to their attention until months later.
 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

416 comments:

  1. Is that the new E4E logo?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Super old news......

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds like you want to sweep this under the rug. Why is that? These Gestapo in training teens need attention. This story is just getting going. 7:38 you may want to buckle up if you or yours are involved. Just a little mental leap there considering your very odd comment.

      Delete
    2. Story may be old to you, but it’s new to the rest of us!

      Delete
    3. I'm talking about the news cycle, not the story itself.
      Steve Puterski had this story out 6 days ago...An eternity in today's world.

      Delete
    4. So which kid might yours be, 8:32? Your response is odd.

      Delete
    5. None bro, the story is a week old. Your response is stupid......

      Delete
  3. Carve a swastika in their foreheads. Let them wear it for life if that’s the symbol they want to be associated with.

    -Aldo the Apache.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. See how that works out for them!

      Delete
  4. Apparently you guys haven't been reading the news!

    Turns out the kids who was flying the plane and took the picture from above asked his friends to do a swastika.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^^Lying Nazi scum.

      The Jewish student asked people to form a smiley face for an aerial photo.

      These little Nazi fucks did this instead.

      Their names need to be exposed so colleges can decide if they want to admit these little Nazi fuckers.

      Delete
    2. 8:43 So you never did anything stupid when you were 13yo (Freshman). These are Freshman, they did something stupid and without a doubt had no idea what they were doing, and what the consequences would be or they wouldn't have done it.

      But you wanna destroy the rest of their lives, because of single mistake, yet you wanna celebrate people like George Floyd? Interesting.

      Delete
    3. 8:50,

      If you find yourself defending Nazis, you might want to reevaluate your life choices.

      They didn’t accidentally form a swastika.

      Names.

      Delete
    4. 8:52 I'm not defending Nazis, I never said that.

      I'm defending kids from lifelong harm that you're trying to inflict on them because you can't see the long-term affects, the bigger picture.

      True justice balances consequences with compassion. It believes in the possibility of growth. When we invest in teaching and guiding young people instead of condemning them for life, we give them a chance to become part of the solution—to grow, to repair harm, and to build a more just and understanding world.

      Delete
    5. 9:12,

      You are **LITERALLY** defending Nazis.

      Do better.

      Delete
    6. Naw, I'm with 9:12. Find some balance. Take your personal outrage issues and do something else....

      Delete
  5. Freshman can do some pretty stupid things. Best guess, they didn't know what they were doing. Finally, how did the kid's know that their jewish friend would be flying over the campus at that moment? Because it was staged.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Read the article. The student/pilot asked people to form a smiley face.

      Little Nazi turd bags need their names public.

      Delete


    2. "On May 30, a freshman student was taking a flying lesson out of Palomar-McClellan Airport and was passing over SDA to take a picture of their P.E. class, sources said. The student cleared the activity with the P.E. teacher, who organized for students to position themselves in a human smiley face, according to a source."

      Delete
  6. Somebody on here trying to play this down sounds like the parent of a little Nazi turd.

    Fuck that.

    Let’s have some names.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 8:46 you don't think 13 yo kids make mistakes and can learn from their mistakes?

      You wanna destroy the rest of their lives because they did something stupid.

      Delete
    2. 8:51,

      Names need to be public.

      Accountability.

      Let the colleges they apply to and future employers decide if this is a youthful transgression.

      Delete
    3. 8:51 At 13 years old, these students are still forming their understanding of the world. While what they did is unquestionably wrong and must be taken seriously, we must also recognize the difference between intentional hate and ignorance shaped by immaturity or lack of education.

      Delete
    4. 8:55 At 13 years old, these students are still forming their understanding of the world. While what they did is unquestionably wrong and must be taken seriously, we must also recognize the difference between intentional hate and ignorance shaped by immaturity or lack of education.

      Delete
    5. 8:55 Justice, when guided by compassion, allows space for change. By teaching instead of condemning, we not only help these young people grow into better citizens, we help build a more informed, inclusive, and united community.

      Delete
    6. Sorry, this is a time for condemning. That's how they learn.

      Delete
    7. 9:01 I agree this is a teaching moment, but if you're going to condemn 13 yo Freshman for the rest of their lives by trying to prevent them from going to college, then what are you teaching them.

      Delete
    8. Let the college/employer decide.

      If it was a youthful transgression as you suggest, then let the kid make that case in interviews or admissions essays.

      Let the kid make their case about what happened and what they learned.

      I believe if they are honest and open, employers and colleges will listen.

      I do not believe in sweeping Nazi bullshit under the rug.

      You should’ve taught your kid better.

      Delete
    9. Handle it the same way Cathedral handled the Catholics vs. Convicts issue. Kids have to know the history, and why it's wrong...

      Punishment at the HS level seems appropriate...

      Delete
    10. Freshmen are typically 14 or 15, not that it really matters. They're still kids, and there are a lot better ways to teach them the gravity of their error than to have it follow them into adulthood.

      Delete
  7. 13 and a freshman? Think again, 15.

    Agree somebody on here trying to play this down sounds like the parent of a little Nazi. Why would anyone think this is something to ignore, excuse, or downplay? The names will come out eventually.

    Separate note, how did the teacher not notice the kids were not forming a circle for the smiley face? Weird and concerning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 8:59 Where does it say the Freshman were 15? Most Freshman are 13 years old.

      Delete
    2. 8:59 Punishing children for the rest of their lives risks turning a moment of ignorance into a lifelong burden, rather than a critical opportunity for growth. Accountability is essential, but so is education.

      These students must come to understand the true impact of their actions, hear from those affected, and be given the tools to think critically, empathize deeply, and act responsibly.

      Delete
    3. So if SDA chose to ignore this for four months, exactly who do we trust to deliver this education? I'd be yanking my kid from SDA's "supervision."

      Delete
    4. 9:06 At 13 years old, children are still learning who they are, how the world works, and what it means to be responsible members of a community.

      They make mistakes, sometimes serious ones, not because they are beyond hope, but because they are still developing the ability to fully understand the consequences of their actions.

      They should be punished, but don't destroy their lives, make this a learning experience. Take the big boy route, forgive and grow from the mistake.

      Delete
    5. 15-16 not 13. Stop making up alternate facts.

      Delete
    6. I trust future employers and colleges to make their own judgement with all of the information.

      If this was a learning experience, let the kid explain that and make the case.

      Sweeping it under the rug and hiding the names just teaches the kids that mommy and daddy will protect them from consequences.

      You want to make these kids strong adults? Don’t protect them from consequences.

      Delete
    7. 9:15

      This is a red flag for me. It appears you want to make the children look as old as possible, when in fact you don't have any information as to their age. All we know is that they were Freshman.

      Why are you trying to make them look older, is it because you want to paint them in a light as almost adults? That's weird and dishonest.

      All we know is that the pilot was 15 and the kids who made the Nazi symbol were Freshman. Prove me wrong!

      Delete
  8. Long-term punishment isolates and stigmatizes kids, pushing them away from the support systems and education that could help them become the thoughtful, compassionate adults we want in our communities.

    It risks turning a poor decision into a permanent sentence rather than a stepping stone toward maturity and accountability.

    A lot of great people who are now productive members of our society made big mistakes as kids.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 9:10 Big mistakes bring big lessons. If they don't learn the big lessons they'll screw themselves for life. Their choice.

      You don't want to stigmatize the perpetrators, but you're ok with them stigmatizing the Jewish student? Want to explain your thinking here?

      Delete
    2. 9:14 where did I say I want to stigmatize anyone? I feel horrible for the Jewish student. You sure jump to conclusions quickly. Making this a teaching moment where you can bring all the children and community together, strength is in forgiveness. Teach the children how awful symbology like the swaztika is.

      Delete
    3. When you refer only to the perpetrators as stigmatized, it's not a jump to assume you do not include the Jewish student. No fast jumping to conclusions, maybe you should express yourself more carefully.

      And how can the school contribute when they sat on this for four months? Serious question.

      Delete
    4. 9:37 I think you are misunderstanding me, and that's ok.

      As I've stated before, I fee awful for the jewish child and what he/she is going through. I feel bad for all the Jewish children and what they must be feeling.

      But in our religion we forgive and that's what builds strength and courage.

      A little FYI, I am Jewish - so it would appear you have "jumped to assume".

      Our Halacha speaks in depth regarding forgiveness.

      Now, regarding the school, who knows what internal communication with the parents, etc, is going on. Stop assuming!






      Delete
  9. The article does not state 13, but independent sources do state 15-16. Stop downplaying their actions.

    https://www.k12academics.com/school-grades/10th-grade
    "Students are usually 15 to 16 years of age."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 9:12 I'm downplaying anything.

      The article states they were Freshman, how many 16 yo Freshman do you know?

      Even if some of them were sophomores, there are still babies. Children make mistakes. Stop ruling with an iron fist and use this as a teaching moment - not a let's lynch 'em all moment.

      Delete
    2. Hiding their identities is teaching them that the privilege of upper middle class white mommy and daddy will shield them from consequences.

      This is how we make irresponsible and morally weak young adults.

      Delete
    3. 9:12 here's what we do know from the sources.

      The student pilot was 15 and the children who formed the Swaztika were Freshman. Most Freshman are 13 years old!

      Delete
    4. 9:19 There's a reason that we protect children's identities, because they're children.

      This has nothing to do with "upper middle white mommy and daddy". Lots of Black, Hispanic, Asian, children make mistakes at 13yo, this isn't just a white thing.

      Delete
    5. 9:22,

      As an employer, I would want the information. I would also want to talk to the candidate about it. I would also consider the age at the time.

      I’d like to think I can make the call whether the person I’m hiring is honest and of good character.

      And if I smell Nazi scumbag, I should have the right to not hire.

      Protecting kids from the natural consequences—i.e. having to explain their choices and actions—makes them weaker, not stronger.

      Yes we all make mistakes. And we should all give each other grace where it’s due. But we should also expect others to judge for themselves the quality of our character. And when we fuck up, we should not expect to have it swept under the rug.

      Delete
    6. 9:22 well then by your logic all children must be exposed to the public/employers/collegefor mistakes they made as children.

      You can’t just single out a NAZI symbol. What about anti-white, anti-police, anti-Hamas, anti-Israel, anti-old white men, etc etc.

      If you’re an employer then all of these categories could hurt your relationship with the employee.

      You can’t just cherry pick, because all of these subjects - anti-white, anti-police, anti-government, etc they all effect people.

      So by your logic let all these children be exposed for scribbling political messages on the wall, spray painting something obscene, making a swaztika.

      You can’t cherry pick one over the others, they all effect us differently.

      Delete
  10. So when you enter freshman year, you're 14. Most kids then turn 15 before the year is out. The age ranges for HS are 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 9:19 so you're saying that a 14 year old is mature and that they should be punished for the rest of their lives?

      That we should give children a second chance for stupid mistakes they make. Obviously these kids thought what they were doing was funny or they wouldn't have done it in public in the middle of soccer field in front of everyone.

      Children make really bad decisions often, don't punish them for the rest of their lives. That's the lynching mentality.

      Delete
    2. No one says "rest of their lives" other than those trying to minimize what they did. Teach them a lesson they will remember is what most are saying. And that does not mean "finding a place to gather" or "come together as a community" or any of that squishy parenting that will not have a lasting impact on correcting the mindset and behavior of their kids.

      What happened is dead serious and should be treated as an "emergency." Where is the Degher Shindler WoodsDrakeShook outrage and call to immediate action now?

      Delete
    3. You keep saying punished.

      Exposing kids to the consequences of their own actions isn’t punishment—it’s a gift in the long run that will make them stronger and more carefully and consciously moral people.

      Wrapping kids in bubble wrap from the natural consequences of their actions and choices is about the worst thing you could do to them from a character development perspective. That’s a recipe for condemning a kid to a life of weakness and poor character. I can’t think of a worse punishment than that.

      Delete
    4. 9:43 I keep say “punished” because the person in the above thread wanted to expose these children to colleges and condemn for the rest of their lives.

      Children make mistakes! They should be taught a lesson, but don’t expose them to the entire world and destroy their lives.

      Delete
    5. 9:42 I keep saying “rest of their lives” because that’s exactly what will happen if you publicly expose them for everyone in the world to see.

      Delete
    6. No one is going to follow these kids around and "expose" them to colleges and lifelong condemnation. But if their actions are discoverable in the course of a normal background check, so be it. Actions have consequences. Teaching this is indeed a gift.

      Delete
    7. 10:05 the commenter above made the mention that these kids names should be given to all the colleges.

      If these kids aren’t given an opportunity to go to college because of public exposure, then the rest of their lives will negatively be impacted.

      Is that so hard to understand?

      Delete
    8. 9:46,

      Let me tell you a true story.

      When I was 7-8, I started taking things that weren’t mine and telling lies about it. I stole Halloween candy from my brothers. I pocketed gum from convenience stores. I had a janitor let me into a classroom after school saying I forgot a book. In reality I wanted a handheld video game a girl brought and left in her desk.

      I got caught.

      My parents were old school. I was exposed very publicly, and made to make amends very publicly. To this day, it still affects me. It wasn’t the judgement of others that affected me. It was the internal sense of shame. It felt so awful. And I knew immediately I never wanted to feel that way about myself again.

      I’ve never cheated on my wife. I’ve never taken anything that was not mine. I don’t push boundaries with paying taxes. I’ve never had a speeding ticket. For years I kept the receipts from my corporate credit card travel expenses in boxes in the garage because if anyone questioned a single thing on my expense reports from five years ago, I wanted to show the receipts. I’ve never been sued and never sued anyone for anything. I have the highest credit score you can imagine. I have turned myself in to bosses, family, and friends over my own mistakes more times than I can count.

      Being made to publicly and painfully face the consequences of my own actions at 7-8 absolutely changed my life for the better. I have zero doubt about it.

      We bubble wrap kids too much, and we are doing damage to their moral character.

      Delete
    9. 9:46 My parents were the same when I was your age, old-school. My mom even took me to the police station when my friend and I broke into a house when I was 6 or 7. Terrifying.

      The difference is, they didn't publicly expose you for all the colleges, employers, etc to see.

      Do you have a police record because of this incident? Of course not, you were 7-8.

      These children are 13-14, they're are children, obviously less mature than most, but still children.

      You're parents didn't publicly expose you for the world to see, the newspaper didn't print your name, colleges and employers weren't notified, police didn't create a Record of misconduct on you.

      Bottom line: Punishing children for the rest of their lives risks turning a moment of ignorance into a lifelong burden, rather than a critical opportunity for growth. Accountability is essential—but so is education. These students must come to understand the true impact of their actions, hear from those affected, and be given the tools to think critically, empathize deeply, and act responsibly.

      Justice, when guided by compassion, allows space for change. By teaching instead of condemning, we not only help these young people grow into better citizens—we help build a more informed, inclusive, and united community.

      Delete
  11. Parenting vs. peer pressure? This disgraceful behavior did not come out of thin air. Sunlight is the best remedy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 9:30 lots of things come out of thin air.

      As children there are countless examples in both of our lives of doing stupid things that our parents never taught us or advocated for.

      Be strong - it’s harder to forgive and teach than to simply point the finger and condemn.

      Look inward, what does your heart say?

      Delete
    2. Condemn and explain why Nazi behavior deserves only condemnation.

      What form exactly does your "forgive" take? "Please don't do that again you're only 15 and don't know what you're doing." That kind of forgive?

      Delete
    3. 9:53 would you please rephrase your question, I’m having a difficult time understanding your question.

      Delete
    4. What does "forgive" sound like to you? What words would you use to "forgive" the perpetrators?

      Delete
    5. 10:16
      Children are still learning how to understand right from wrong, and their brains, emotions, and moral compass are far from fully developed. When a child makes a serious mistake—even a terrible one—it’s not a sign of who they are forever, but a moment that can shape who they become.

      Forgiving a child doesn’t mean ignoring the harm. It means choosing to guide, to teach, and to believe in their ability to grow. Accountability is essential—but so is compassion.

      When we forgive and educate rather than condemn, we give children the chance to become the thoughtful, responsible adults our world needs.


      Delete
    6. 10:16
      The students who did this are young. That doesn’t excuse the harm—but it means they still have the ability to learn, to understand the gravity of what they’ve done, and to take responsibility.

      We do not protect children by shielding them from consequences, but by guiding them through them.

      Accountability is not punishment for the sake of punishment; it’s the first step in transformation.

      Forgiveness is not forgetting. It is not pretending the pain wasn’t real. Forgiveness is a courageous act. It says: We believe you can do better. We believe you can learn. We believe hate is not the end of your story.

      Delete
    7. Who will deliver that gracious message of forgiveness? The parents who shaped these kids? The school that looked the other way for four months?

      Delete
    8. 10:46 Do you have inside information that the friends of the Jewish pilot didn't ask for forgiveness? Because right now you're assuming.

      Delete
    9. Hey if they did let's hear all about it! That would be awesomely welcome news for real.

      Delete
  12. 13 year old children make mistakes, let the parents and school work it out, Mali!

    Don’t use this as an excuse to start a riot and sew divide amongst people. It’s sad that you have to piggy back on trauma to raise money and look relevant.

    These kids should be punished, they should learn that what they did was horrible - so they never do it again.

    Don’t destroy all of these kids lives because of their mistake.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. *** it saddens me that I even have to explain this to you.

      Delete
    2. 15 stop gaslighting not 13. No destruction, natural consequences. No idea what your raising money/relevance thing is about, you sound like you are spinning out.

      Division is sown when you try to create an us and them dynamic. Do you think showing a Jewish person a swastika could possibly sew division? We'll wait.

      Delete
    3. *sow division, geez made your mistake :D

      Delete
    4. 10:14 Not gaslighting, you are....

      The Jewish student pilot was 15.

      There is no sources that gives the ages of the other students.

      Delete
    5. 10:14 You say "division is sown when you try to create an us and them dynamic" isn't that exactly what you are doing?

      You're trying to get the names of these children so you can publicly expose them, for all to see, "us and them."

      Let the school, board and parents work this out....

      No need to start rioting and sowing divide, you've done enough of that already Mali. You don't teach love, you teach hate.

      Delete
  13. 10:13 your true story shows how it should work. When my bro stole gum from the local store, my mom marched him back down there, had him apologize, and return the item to the shop owner. The bro was 7 and that early experience taught him but good. The same feeling of never wanting to feel that shame again served him well for life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 10:34 I have no doubt these kids regret what they did....
      1. It's in the newspaper
      2. They're feeling shame in front of other kids and teachers.
      3. I'd bet the farm that their parents have laid into them.
      4. I'd bet the farm the kids have apologized to their former friend.
      5. Based on the exposure this event has had in the national media, I'd bet they're pretty traumatized.

      These kids need to feel all of these things and learn from their mistake, maybe a mandatory class in Nazi history could help.

      However, publicly exposing children to the world for the mistakes they make is not a good idea and there's a reason it's illegal. At worst - It could endanger the children and their families lives, at best it would destroy these children's and their families lives.

      If you think public exposure of these kids names and who their family members are is a great idea, well then I guess we'll just have to disagree.

      Delete
    2. That's a lot of farm betting.

      Delete
  14. Jewish law says the person doing the wrong should ask forgiveness from the person they harmed.

    Not praying for forgiveness from God. Not doing 10 Hail Marys for the priest. Not their parents telling them it's not ok please don't do that again. Not the school playing CYA and giving extra classes and counseling on why Nazis are bad.

    So this is the test, let's see who passes. Who among the offenders will go directly to the offended to ask forgiveness? 10:37, 10:41 - that's how it's done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 10:54 The Halacha does, you are correct....

      How do we know these kids haven't asked for forgiveness from the person they harmed (which was a friend of theirs according to the report)?

      Do you have information that they haven't asked for forgiveness?

      Delete
    2. Do you have information that they have? We don't know, just stating what Jewish law says should happen. Calm down and let's see how this plays out.

      Delete
    3. 11:34 I’m not the one assuming the kids haven’t apologized. Maybe they have maybe they haven’t, but assumptions either way are wrong.

      Delete
  15. Why don't we ask Marlon some of these questions, he's on the school board.

    ReplyDelete
  16. You’re assuming that colleges and employers cannot properly factor in that a kid was 14 years old. I think they can.

    Furthermore, I think if the consequences of this event were life-changing for the kid, it would show. And I might rather hire or admit a kid who had been through something like that. It brings a maturity and seriousness that other kids won’t have.

    On the other hand, if the kid makes jokes and excuses, he’s actually a punk Nazi.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 11:10 Well then let’s expose everything that children do for the world to see, that way we can judge them from a college and employer standpoint.

      Get a detention or suspension for calling someone a “fag”, scribbling a penis on the bathroom stall, etc. Let’s put everything in the record if we’re going to be judging. No cherry picking, because everything affects everyone differently.

      Or we could let children be children and hope they learn valuable lessons from their mistakes.

      Delete
    2. 11:10
      Protecting children’s identities when they make mistakes is crucial because it allows them the opportunity to learn, grow, and take responsibility without facing lifelong consequences.

      Public exposure can lead to shame, bullying, stigma, and even long-term damage to their mental health and future opportunities. Children are still developing — emotionally, socially, and morally — and they deserve the chance to correct their behavior in a safe and supportive environment.

      By keeping their identities private, we uphold their dignity, protect their future, and reinforce the belief that mistakes are a part of learning, not a permanent label.

      Delete
    3. Knee jerk much 11:31? These kids were loud and proud and put their faces on their handiwork. They asked to be outed. Excusing this as "children will be children" is sickening. Are you one of the parents or part of the cover up at SDA? Nothing else explains such an ignoramus response as yours.

      Delete
    4. 11:36 that’s all you’ve got, name calling. You’re no better than the symbol these kids placed on the field.

      You have zero compassion for children who make mistakes. You don’t know if these kids asked their Jewish friend for forgiveness.

      Apparently you’re perfect and have never screwed up as a child. I feel sorry for you - you must go through life wedged in anger and misery.

      You don’t believe in forgiveness - you hate it, you only want consequences and suffering of others because it makes you feel better about yourself.

      You need help!

      As for the children, I feel awful for all of them. None of them are celebrating this, they’re all suffering from both the stigma, consequences and the attack. I’m guessing lots of sleepless nights and trauma.

      For you to hope that misery continues and compounds with life changing consequences is not sickening, it’s sad.

      I feel sorry for people like you, my guess, you don’t have too many meaningful relationships with people.

      Get help!

      PS not a parent or on the school board. I am Jewish and I believe in forgiveness and growth.

      Delete
    5. 11:36 did it ever occur to you that the reason the children “put their faces on it” was because they didn’t emotionally understand the significance of the Nazi symbol. They aren’t emotionally mature to connect with the millions of death behind that symbol.

      Now ask yourself if they did understand and they did understand the consequences, media, suspension or expulsion, lawsuit, etc etc…

      Would they have really “put their faces to it”?

      Use your fucking head, do some deductive reasoning!

      Delete
    6. Yeah right I'm no better. Most people do nothing that comes even close to what these "children" did. Made mistakes? You bet. On this level of wrong? No.

      You feel awful for the perpetrators, where is he in your heart while you're busy feeling sorry for the teenagers who did this?

      Sleepless nights for the perpetrators? With SDA and apparently their parents covering for them, doubtful. From one Jew to another, btw. Don't feel sorry for me, feel sorry for these kids being trained to view this incident as something to look back and laugh at one day. That's how it works without consequences. You imagine a lot of regret for them that I'd bet the farm they do not feel.

      Delete
    7. I think a public apology to that student at a school assembly is a start. Sounds like the whole student body could use some immersive work anti-semitism....

      Delete
    8. 11:59 yea right! Really, you can't think of any bigger mistake than some stupid children forming a swaztika on the grass.

      Tell me how I know you're full of shit without telling me.

      Did the little shits physically harm anyone.

      Here's are some things that are worse that kids do....
      1. Drink and drive
      2. Get pregnant when they have no business having a child
      3. Deal drugs to other kids
      4. Bully other kids the entire time they're in school
      5. Physically harm other kids
      6. Shoot up students
      7. Make bomb threats
      8. Peer pressure on kids to do stupid things
      9. Social bullying
      10. Cyber bullying
      11. Exploitation into performing sexual acts

      The list goes on an on....

      So don't give me your bullshit that this is as bad as it can possibly get.

      Solution: Make the kids publicly apologize in the auditorium to the other kids for what they did. Make them earn their respect again, if they can get it back. But don't just throw these kids away to the public media and shame them.

      It says a lot about who you are as a person when you do that.

      Delete
    9. Bully other kids you say?

      Interesting.

      Say more.

      Like what would be an example of bullying a Jewish student?

      Delete
  17. We don’t know if the kids are remorseful. We can’t ask them, because they are being shielded from the logical consequences of their decisions and actions.

    We don’t know if their parents have given them guidance.

    We don’t know if the school has implemented proper response.

    The only thing we know for sure is that there are plenty of adults willing to make excuses and psychobabble, including lies like the Jewish student asked them to do it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 12:07 there’s plenty of psycho parents on both sides.

      There’s parents who want to expose the identities of children in an attempt to ruin their lives.

      There’s parents who feel criminal charges and juvenile hall should be given to the perpetrators.

      There’s parents who want all colleges and future employers to have record of this incident in hope these kid never get an opportunity in life.

      There’s all sorts of of psycho babble and parents on all sides.

      Bottom line: let the professionals handle it, it’s their job. Let the school admin, board, superintendent, principal do there job. Let the parents navigate this along with them.

      Don’t start making assumptions, let the news unfold and let’s we what course of action is.

      That’s all I got, I’m done.

      Delete
    2. Apparently the principal wasn’t doing their job, and is now on administrative leave.

      It’s you making assumptions. Assumptions like everything is being done correctly.

      Delete
    3. 12:59 Does that mean Marlon wasn't doing his job either? After all he's on the school board?

      Name one single assumption I've made, just one.

      You on the other hand have assumed...
      1. They children have a "white upper middle class mommy and daddy"
      2. There are Nazis.
      3. We should carve swaztika's in their foreheads
      4. That the kids are all 15 & 16 years old
      5. That kids never apologized because they're sheltered
      6. The kids have right wing parents

      The list goes on and on....

      The assumptions are all coming from you.

      Delete
    4. I get that you are upset.

      Focus that rage on the little Nazi you’re raising.

      Delete
    5. 1:55 Thank you for making my point. I have two adult children, one a Doctor, the other a well known architect.

      I hope you get help.... Maybe someday you'll learn that it's important to protect and help all children.

      Delete
    6. 1:49,

      Re assumptions.

      1. They children have a "white upper middle class mommy and daddy"

      Have you walked around SDA lately? Pretty good assumption.


      2. There are Nazis.

      Um. Yeah. There are.

      3. We should carve swaztika's in their foreheads

      How is this an assumption? It’s a reference to a movie. You failed to Google Aldo the Apache, huh?

      4. That the kids are all 15 & 16 years old

      I didn’t.

      5. That kids never apologized because they're sheltered

      No. What I said was “ We don’t know if the kids are remorseful. We can’t ask them, because they are being shielded from the logical consequences of their decisions and actions.”. And that is 100% true.

      6. The kids have right wing parents

      Not me. But do they?

      Your assumptions are that everything is being handled properly behind closed doors. Which we don’t know, because closed doors. And what we do know is that the principal is apparently on leave, which doesn’t suggest everything is great.

      You also assumed that the kids are remorseful, have made apologies, and that the parents are all doing the right thing. You don’t know any of that, unless you are actually the parent of one of the little Nazis, in which case I don’t believe you.

      Delete
    7. Marlon's on EUSD, not SDUHSD. Idiots.

      Delete
  18. Several of the kids have well known right wing parents. They left that part out but explains the attempts to make excuses. Just like they're doing for Luke.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Luke's parents are Dems who do not make his excuses. Try again. Do better. Right, Marlon?

      Delete
    2. 12:56 So now you're gonna just spread rumors and sow divide between us by crafting such blatantly obvious lies - "Several of the kids have well known right wing parents."

      Two things you've shown us here:
      1. You're a liar because you don't know who the parents are
      2. You're a liar because you're associating all people who make excuses as "right wingers."
      3. You're insinuating that I'm making excuses for the children when in fact I'm only telling you that it's important to protect their identity, which is the law.
      4. You're trying to tie people who are trying to protect children from public exposure as Nazis and that those are Luke supporters.

      All you've done here is show us how emotionally unhinged you are.

      My guess and tell me if I'm wrong, you're a Blakespear, Sabellico, Gonzalez, Nathan Fletcher supporter. I'd bet money on it.

      How do I know? You makes wild assumptions with lots of emotions and very little in the facts department. You're an extremely person who loves trauma and drama. You'd love nothing more than to turn this into a riot, just like George Floyd. You take advantage of other people's hardships and turn them into yours. You're selfish....

      This is how I know you are a Blakespear supporter.

      Delete
    3. Have to say it all fits.

      Delete
    4. Except for the riot part. They're the ones trying to diminish the situation, call the perpetrators "children," lie about the school age, zero outrage about SDA hiding the incident. This should turn very public and nasty if the right things are not done to TRY to mitigate, immediately.

      Who is the schoolteacher who failed to notice the perpetrators were not making a circle? Should have been fairly obvious. Who stood by what looking at their phone instead of watching over the proceedings? They are not protected by age, give us the name.

      Delete
    5. I don’t care the politics of the parents. It’s not relevant. And it shouldn’t affect how these little Nazis are dealt with.

      Delete
    6. 2:21 They are "children", are you telling me they're adults?

      They're Freshman, the student pilot was 15, the only age that's been reported.

      Why is it when I ask for evidence of age you refuse to show me any.

      Then you try to tie this to Republicans, when in fact the Democrats are the Pro Palestine and Pro Hamas party. Republicans have been defending Israel.

      Thanks for telling us you're liar without telling.

      Delete
    7. If you can't accept links provided to Freshman school ages (15-16) then no one can help you, you're stuck in your narrative of excuses.

      Hamas/Palestine has zilch to do with knowing that the swastika is associated with Nazis. If these kids haven't learned that then SDA has failed them again. I'm not tying this to any political party, you and others are.

      Delete
    8. 3:10 so by your logic, if they’re 16 when they’re a freshman, they’re 17 when they’re a sophomore they’re 18 when they’re a junior and they’re 19 when they’re seniors. 19 would be a pretty old senior.

      You haven’t shown me any sources related to these freshmen. If so, please post a link showing me the ages of the freshmen involved.

      My guess….

      You won’t share a link with me because there are no links showing that these freshmen were 15 to 16 years old.

      This is why you have no credibility, because you’re lying about their ages.

      Delete
    9. 3:10 quit lying, you have no idea how old these freshmen were. The newspapers have not reported it. The average freshman is anywhere from between 13 and 14 years old.

      Delete
    10. “ it's important to protect their identity, which is the law.”

      Maybe.

      What law?

      Cite it.

      Delete
    11. 3:56 YES...IT'S THE LAW.... Minors identities are protected, idiot....

      "1. Juvenile Confidentiality Laws (Welfare & Institutions Code § 827)

      In California, juvenile court records are confidential. This means the identity of minors involved in crimes is generally not public information.

      Only certain individuals (e.g., parents, legal guardians, attorneys, law enforcement) have access to a minor’s juvenile records.

      Members of the public or media must petition the court to gain access, and even then, the court may deny access to protect the minor’s privacy."

      MORE SPECIFICALLY.....

      2. "Schools and FERPA (Federal Law)

      Under FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act), schools cannot release personally identifiable information about a student without parental consent, even if the student is disciplined for a serious offense.

      This applies to student records, including anything that would identify them as being involved in misconduct or crimes on campus."

      Delete
    12. 3:56
      "Penalties for Violating Confidentiality
      Educators or officials who release confidential information about a student’s disciplinary record or criminal involvement could face:

      1. Loss of professional credentials.
      2. Civil lawsuits from the student or their family.
      3. School district or state disciplinary action."

      Delete
    13. 4:11,

      I searched and that quote doesn’t seem to come from California law.

      Delete
    14. 4:20 Once again you've proven you're an idiot:

      Here's the link to the California Welfare and Institutions Code Section 827.

      https://california.public.law/codes/welfare_and_institutions_code_section_827?utm_source=chatgpt.com

      Delete
    15. That has to do with disclosure of legal or disciplinary case files by the school.

      Nothing about if my kid knows who these kids are and I post it here, right?

      Delete
    16. There are also social media laws that protect children under 16, you can be held liable. Keep reading.

      Delete
    17. 4:42 keep reading, there are laws that protect minors under 16 from you doing this.

      Delete
    18. No there are not.

      The laws prohibit the school from disclosing.

      I don’t work for the school.

      Delete
  19. My guess, the parents were Democrats.

    Why?

    The Democrats have not the Republicans have been extremely pro-Hamas and Palestine. The Republicans have been pro Israel.

    The Democrats have been holding pro Palestine and Hamas demonstrations across the country.

    So, my guess, these kids were hearing a lot of anti-Israel and Jew rhetoric from their Democrat parent, because Republicans have demonstrated and continue to demonstrate their support for Israel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Irrelevant. Your can't boil down the situation in Israel that easily. Way too much going on. You want to understand the Middle East, you'll have to work a lot harder than that.

      Delete
    2. 1.) who cares what the politics of the parents are. The kids are Nazis. That’s all that matters.

      2.) Believe it or not, it’s possible to be anti- state-sponsored-genocide without bringing religion into it. In fact, there are a huge amount of Jews in America who are opposed to the horrific acts of Israel in Gaza.

      Delete
    3. Sounds like Golden Pedo stupidity. Jews who foolishly believe evangelical Christians and their MAGA party are on their side are no different than the German Jews that supported Hitler in the early days .... you know, before they were murdered.

      Delete
    4. 2:30 Bingo! The kids have been exposed to so much extreme hatred of the Jewish people since on October 7, 2023, when Hamas and other Palestinian militants attacked Israel killing nearly 1,200 Israelis. They are acting out what they have had to watch, hear, due to the Democrat progressives hatred and violence because the Jewish people have had to defend themselves from the terrorists. What college campus has not had violent protests against the Jewish people- screaming genocide and burning the USA flag while at it.? Many of the CEO have been removed from their positions for not defending the Jewish kids from the agitators. These kids are a product of the hatred and violence that they have had to experience against their Jewish classmates for the past 2 years. The school and the board are responsible for not correcting what is being taught to them, and the abuse that they have allowed to go on campus. This is not a 1st at SDUHSD. The kids should be reprimanded, but the teachers and the board should be fired that have supported, and probably even taught this hatred and violence.

      Delete
    5. Nobody asked you Ratchel. Go take your meds.

      Delete
  20. "I don’t care the politics of the parents. It’s not relevant. And it shouldn’t affect how these little Nazis are dealt with."

    BINGO. Name the teacher's name. Find out why SDA sat on this, name the names responsible. Save misplaced compassion for those who deserve it, not these nazis in training. They should be suspended. End of story. Let them and their parents have a good think on it. Decide who they want to be going forward. Zero tolerance.

    ReplyDelete
  21. The most appropriate consequence should be to require these kids to meet with a holocaust survivor or someone who teaches about the trauma felt by family members of survivors. Suspend them and make it a condition of return that they go to the Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles and learn about why this is a very big deal. Guaranteed they'll come out of it better people, and not have their lives destroyed for doing something stupid as kids.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I disagree.

      I think the most appropriate consequence is that three years from now they have to sit in front of an admissions officer for the college they want to attend, where they have a dialog about what they did, why, what they learned, and what they have done in the three years since that was their own idea—not anything that adults made them do.

      Self-discipline starts with self.

      Delete
    2. 3:42 should high school students have to sit in front of an admissions officer and admit to underage drinking and smoking pot. Driving friends while under the influence, cyber bullying, etc.... Because if so, a lot of admissions officer's will be more inclined to not accept these students for admission. Breaking the law is Breaking law. Putting people's lives in danger - drinking and driving is much worse.

      Delete
    3. Admissions officers do know that stuff, because these days kids post it online.

      If you don’t think admissions is crawling court records, social media, blogs, and credit scores, you’re wrong.

      They know more than you think, and yes, they should.

      Delete
    4. 4:09 Bullshit.....Just like you tried to tell me minors identities aren't protected - to which I cited the law.

      Each University received hundreds of thousands of admission applications each year. Yet, you're trying to tell me they look at all the kids social media accounts, crawl through court records, blogs, credit scores, etc.

      YOUR FULL OF SHIT!

      That would take years to dive through on the hundreds of thousands of applicants that each school receives. They might in extreme cases, for example big scholarships, athletics, etc. But to your average student, they are looking at GPA, course activity, SAT scores, extra curricular activity.

      Delete
    5. 4:09 "If you don’t think admissions is crawling court records, social media, blogs, and credit scores, you’re wrong."

      BULL SHIT!

      What Admissions Officers Say
      According to surveys like the Kaplan Test Prep annual survey:

      "Around 20–30% of admissions officers say they have looked at applicants' social media.

      Only a small percentage say they do it regularly.

      Some schools have official policies stating they do not consider social media at all."

      Once again we've established that you are a liar. Democrats lie, it's a cult of lies.

      Delete
    6. 4:16,

      You don’t even need AI to do this.

      Very simple crawlers and subscription data feeds.

      I could build you one in a day that creates a numerical score representing the risk that the student will drop out, cause trouble on campus, or get into legal trouble.

      It’s called a Baysian inference engine. I once worked on one that ranked the probability of IED or car bomb attacks in Kabul by date, time, and location.

      P.S. pretty sure the quote you posted wasn’t from CA law. Prove me wrong. Cite the Title and section.

      Delete
    7. 4:22,

      You seem awfully emotional about the prospect that your kid will be exposed as a Nazi.

      Delete
    8. 4:31 you use Google, I use ChatGPT. What’s the difference!

      Just because you say the code doesn’t exist doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

      Here’s the CA code and the link, via ChatGPT.

      Here's the link to the California Welfare and Institutions Code Section 827.

      https://california.public.law/codes/welfare_and_institutions_code_section_827?utm_source=chatgpt.com

      Delete
    9. 4:31 The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)

      https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/ed/dataprivacyferpa.asp

      Delete
    10. 4:31 For students in K‑12 in California, the relevant code is the California Education Code, Title 2, Part 27, Chapter 65: Pupil Records (e.g. Ed. Code §§ 49060 et seq.) which governs pupil/ student records, disclosure, parental access, and confidentiality.

      Delete
    11. 4:34 There you go again, making assumptions that are completely off base and inaccurate. All you've demonstrated to us is your hate and need to persecute others constantly, in this case children.

      No, I'm not a parent, I'm not the Golden Pedo, I'm no one you know. I just believe that children make mistakes and destroying a couple of stupid kid's lives over a big mistake does none of us any good.

      You obviously don't have kids. So, I wouldn't expect you to understand.

      Delete
    12. “Nazis are persecuted victims” is a hell of an argument.

      Delete
  22. And if you are the lame asshole making Facebook comments about ‘well actually the swastika was a positive religious symbol in ancient India and Mesopotamia.’

    Bullshit. Stop making excuses for overt acts of Nazis.

    We don’t live in ancient Mesopotamia, and these kids understood that the kid in the plane was Jewish.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well then you better hammer on the Democrats because they are having tons of anti-Israel protests.

      Delete
    2. No religion is a shield from the war crimes of a nation-state.

      Delete
    3. A lot of us protest the actions and policies of Israel, not its right to exist. The genocide going on in Gaza is not acceptable. And so I don't have to hear it, neither are the actions of hamas. Innocent people are dying and have died. None of it is worth it

      Delete
  23. What a complete shitshow of the severe liberalism mental disorder retardation in this thread.

    BURN

    IT

    DOWN

    ReplyDelete
  24. The Principal for SDA is Cara Dolnik, she's a Democrat. Check out her Facebook page and interactions with Tony Kranz, Blakespear, etc. So, between the Anti-Israel Nazi symbol and the Principal of SDA, I'd Democrats have another problem on their hands.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stop. Nobody is for this kind of display of anti-semitism, Dem, Rep, Ind, Libertarian. No one....

      Delete
    2. 4:03 OK, so now you don't want to drag the SDA Principal into this, yet just a little while ago you were calling for the Principal's head. At least until you found out that Cara Dolnik is a Democrat.

      Delete
    3. Anyone who fails to act on Nazi bullshit is a problem.

      I don’t care what their politics are.

      I also don’t care what the parents politics are.

      I care that the little Nazis face the music, which will make them better people.

      Delete
  25. 3:53pm 'I'd Democrats have another problem' ?????? Guess who? Any guesses who this could be? He is consistent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gonzo 🤡 or his predator brother-in-law Letcher?

      You said he, so it’s not The fat Madcow is it! ?

      Delete
    2. Actually, playing by MAGA Luke rules, Fletcher is 100% innocent. He had his due process. No criminal charges were ever brought. The civil case was thrown out.

      By Luke rules, Fletcher needs to get his Sup seat returned to him.

      He is pure as the driven snow.

      Delete
    3. 7:06 you’re a piece of shit if you think a man who cheated on both his wives is innocent. Not only did Nathan cheat on his first wife with Lorena, but then he cheated on his second wife, Lorena. He also fondled a UCSD student.

      How many times did he cheat and wasn’t caught. This is the exact person you don’t want representing your community.

      Only a piece of shit Blakespear supporter who hates Luke would support Nathan Fletcher.

      Delete
  26. A few years ago a bathroom was vandalized at SDA with swastikas and anti-Semitic garbage.

    Perhaps is some lives had been ruined then, these kids would’ve thought twice before doing this.

    When I was a kid we didn’t have this problem because accountability was doled out without regard for their “feelings.”

    The real problem is the adults. The kids just do what we let them get away with.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://fox5sandiego.com/news/swastika-graffiti-found-at-north-county-high-school/

      Delete
  27. Worth putting in a loop:

    “Anyone who fails to act on Nazi bullshit is a problem.

    I don’t care what their politics are.

    I also don’t care what the parents politics are.

    I care that the little Nazis face the music, which will make them better people.“

    ReplyDelete
  28. Its not surprising folks when you have Nazis like Blakespear running the city?

    What did you expect? Mother Teresa?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At 6:02am we already have a dumbest post of the day.

      Congratulations.

      Delete
  29. SDA is the Berkeley of Encinitas.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Let’s compromise.

    Just give us the name of the one whose idea it was.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, can I borrow some tar once you're done with your witchhunt?

      Delete
    2. 7:38, Reevaluate the decision to defend Nazis.

      Delete
  31. 7:06 you’re a piece of shit if you think a man who cheated on both his wives is innocent. Not only did Nathan cheat on his first wife with Lorena, but then he cheated on his second wife, Lorena. He also fondled a UCSD student.

    How many times did he cheat and wasn’t caught. This is the exact person you don’t want representing your community.

    Only a piece of shit Blakespear supporter who hates Luke would support Nathan Fletcher.

    How many times do you think Gonzo has cheated on his wife?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah! Great.

      So we’re shifting the goal posts for Luke too, right?

      So whether Luke is qualified to represent us as a leader now—by your new rules—does NOT have anything to do with whether he’s convicted in court or not.

      You’re now saying that we should have higher standards.

      That irrespective of what is proved in court, if a leader has a demonstrated track record of poor judgement and bad behavior, that alone is grounds for removing them from a position of public trust.

      And your new standard applies to Luke as well.

      I accept your proposal.

      Delete
    2. Probably 0. Do you have the brain power to separate people and situations? Are you able to discontinue the obsession with the extended Gonzalez family? I don't give a rats ass about Nathan Fletcher or his extended family. That's their biz.

      Happy to discuss Gonzo and his politics and anything related to Encinitas. The personal S#$%, no thanks. Everything in this town, is way to personal and has become a cheap shot contest.....

      Delete
    3. 8:33 Nathan Fletcher cheated on his wives, fondled a UCSD student and who knows whatever else he and Lorena Gonzalez have done.

      The family can’t be trusted. They’re human garbage.

      Delete
    4. Okay. So, what I’m hearing you say is that cheating on wives is disqualifying for public office.

      Do porno skanks count?

      Delete
    5. I wonder what the Luke supporters are gonna do when his affairs become public. Make excuses of course!

      Delete
    6. How many baby mommas does Luke have? Is it two or three?

      Delete
  32. The only group further to the political left of Nazis were the Communists.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your school failed you.

      I’m sorry.

      Delete
    2. Can we stop the Nazi discussion?

      Delete
    3. The title at the top of the page:

      “Nazis of San Dieguito Academy”

      So, no.

      Delete
    4. Can we stop talking about the National Socialist party of Germany?

      Delete
  33. 8:05 educate yourself: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

    “Nazism…is the far-right totalitarian ideology and practices associated with Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party (NSDAP) in Germany.”

    ReplyDelete
  34. Nazi’s in an overwhelmingly Democrat community at an overwhelmingly Democrat school. And this is the second time. Why is it Democrat cities always have these problems with their community members?

    Dems hate Israel and are Pro- Hamas. I think that speaks for itself.

    Democrats are Nazis.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Facts is facts 8:56. Who do nazis successfully cozy up to in current times? The orange one. Facts is facts. Can’t spin your way out.

      Delete
    2. So you’re saying the guys with Tiki torches in Charlottesville—the “Jews will not replace us—“ the “fine people on both sides”. . .

      You think those were Dems?

      Your personal reality distortion field is working perfectly.

      Delete
    3. Delusional 8:56. You think MAGA white supremacists are Jewish people's best friends?

      Delete
    4. 9:30 you mean the “Democrat white supremacist” who openly put Nazi symbols on a school field, then have a SDA school Democrat Principal and teachers do nothing about it for months, in hope it’ll just disappear.

      And let’s not forget all the anti - Israel/ anti - Jew protest held by the Democrats across the country. The Democrats are repulsive white supremacist NAZI’s.

      This is how I know you’re delusional.

      Delete
    5. Which party is supported by the KKK and ACTUAL fucking Nazi's? Yeah. Stop with the bullshit.

      Delete
    6. 10:04 the party that’s anti-Israel is the party supported by the Nazi’s. The Democrats have a long history of hating Jews. Case in point SDA and staff covering up a NAZI symbol, numerous Anti - Israel protest by Democrats.

      Get your story straight NAZI!

      Delete
    7. Jewish space lasers

      The Rothchilds

      George Soros

      We all know who owns the conspiracies.

      Delete
    8. Yeah, when your an idiot like that Simone and golden clowns and start with this bullshit that you are a Nazi for hating Israel we know those two are the real racist idiots. Personally, I hate all religions, not equally though. At the moment I hate the genocide Jews and pedo Catholics more than the others. MAGA fools that worship a the most failed biz nepo baby are also high on the list of religions I hate.

      Delete
  35. I want to know why the progressives and Lyndes are silent on this (hate crime) and were triggered by the ICE incident (poorly planned, mishandled). Could it be that they care more about Mexicans/Blacks than Jews? Why is one an emergency and the other ignored. Joy Lyndes, Mali? Marlon? All those people who made a big deal about ICE? Mostly silent, not the same level of concern though Mali did comment on a social media post. I don't think MAGA cares about Jews, but sadly, not do the "progressives".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stop the hate dude, just stop. Not the way to go about this.....

      Delete
    2. Typical Facebook idiocy. Always the same bit.

      Delete
    3. Sure, because we can only focus on one group, and we should rank them.

      Bullshit.

      Delete
    4. Are you really that stupid 9:49?

      Delete
  36. What’s the difference between a Democrat and a Republican.

    A Democrat, Nathan Fletcher cheats on both his wives, fondles a young UCSD students and even cheat on his former wife with his current wife Lorena. You guys all love him.

    A Republican named Luke, backs over a trash can and you wanna put him in jail, when we haven’t seen a shred of evidence regarding any hostility.

    Democrats riot, killing and injuring people, burning down businesses and love to shoot people they don’t agree with.

    Republicans hold vigils.

    Democrats hold anti- Israel (Jew) demonstrations and burn down Jewish building. Republicans hold vigils and you mock and destroy them.

    Democrats are NAZi’s. Keep drinking the cool aide.

    ReplyDelete
  37. That same fools that support ice running around rounding up brown people support Israel bombing schools and hospitals. We see you, we know you are all Maga, we are not as dumb as you and don’t fall for your bullshit. By all means though keep it up, it’s good to know who you are and what you are about. Maga love them some racist shit with a little Nazi and genocide thrown in. Sorry if that is what you thought you were getting with this council, dumbasses.

    ReplyDelete