A lawsuit filed against the city of Encinitas, the state and a local homeowners’ association following a deadly 2019 bluff collapse will move ahead after a recent motion to dismiss the case was denied.
The fatal bluff collapse killed three people: Encinitas residents Julie Davis, 65; her 35-year-old daughter, Anne Clave; and Davis’ 62-year-old sister, Elizabeth Charles of San Francisco. Family members announced the lawsuit last fall while also calling on legislators to support a bill aimed at preventing future coastal bluff collapses.
A judge recently sided with the family after a motion was filed to dismiss the case on the grounds of “natural condition immunity.”
“The natural condition immunity says that if a city or a state only opens up access to a public space they’re not going to be subject to suit,” said Bibi Fell, one of the attorneys for the Davis family. “The difference here is that the city and the state didn’t just open up a natural space.”
Fell argues the city changed, developed and built on the land, decisions she says made the area less safe.
Friday, January 29, 2021
Lawsuit against city in bluff collapse can proceed
Fox 5:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Good. About time Blakespear's "proceed at your own risk while we prioritize trophy projects over your safety" double standards are exposed.
ReplyDeleteShe kneejerked in reaction to her pal Roberta Walker's accident AND HELPED Walker's case by telling the papers that the area was a known issue. Won't find me seeking her legal "expertise."
Double standard here that this snake of a mayor cannot slither around. Can't have it both ways, Cathy.
Cue the bff attorney friend's entrance....
If I'm on the jury, they will get a take nothing. What fool sits at the base of a cliff? From Point Loma to the North, cliff after cliff. What numbskull thinks nothing can happen? One would think after thousands of years people somehow would get smarter. Nope
ReplyDeleteRead the suit. There's a laundry list of protective measures the city was handed by the state and CCC. It failed to check a single box. This goes back years but Blakespear could have fixed that. Instead she busies herself installing new dangers like the cycle trap and Leucadia Blvd. bollards. Dozens of accidents and a death thanks to her handiwork.
DeleteBlakespear hides behind not posting warning signs because she says that would signal liability. But that will get her only so far. Grandview is not the only spot in town where she refuses to put up warning signs. "Let the buyer beware" does not let her off the hook for systemic neglect that she adding to, not addressing.
Signs do nothing. No one pays attentions to signs. They are merely sign pollution. Look at the clusterfuck along the railroad, yet people still jump in front of the train to kill themselves.
DeleteIts so prevalent, the Five Man Electrical Band wrote a song about it,
And the sign said
"Long-haired freaky people
Need not apply"
So I tucked my hair up under my hat
And I went in to ask him why
He said, "You look like a fine upstandin' young man
I think you'll do"
So I took off my hat and said, "Imagine that
Huh, me workin' for you"
Whoa
Sign, sign
Everywhere a sign
Blockin' out the scenery
Breakin' my mind
Do this, don't do that
Can't you read the sign?
And the sign said
"Anybody caught trespassin'
Will be shot on sight"
So I jumped on the fence and I yelled at the house
"Hey! What gives you the right
To put up a fence to keep me out
But to keep Mother Nature in?
If God was here, he'd tell you to your face
'Man, you're some kind of sinner'"
Sign, sign
Everywhere a sign
Blockin' out the scenery
Breakin' my mind
Do this, don't do that
Can't you read the sign?
Now, hey you, mister, can't you read?
You got to have a shirt and tie to get a seat
You can't even watch, no, you can't eat
You ain't supposed to be here
The sign said, "You've got to have a membership card
To get inside"
Uh
And the sign said
"Everybody welcome
Come in, kneel down and pray"
But when they passed around the plate at the end of it all
I didn't have a penny to pay
So I got me a pen and a paper
And I made up my own little sign
I said, "Thank you, Lord, for thinkin' 'bout me
I'm alive and doin' fine"
Woo!
Sign, sign
Everywhere a sign
Blockin' out the scenery
Breakin' my mind
Do this, don't do that
Can't you read the sign?
Sign, sign
Everywhere a sign
Sign
If you want to improve Encinitas, remove signs.
Classic - What fool sits at the base of a cliff?
ReplyDeleteYou are apparently blind or have never gone to the beach. Eitherway, I feel sorry for you.
The Bluff's are significantly weakened by developements' irrigation runoff (underground) that then creates slip planes in the bluff. I know you are not intelligent enough to grasp this concept, but the plaintiffs attorney is on this one.
BIAspear and crew will continue to loss billions of Encinitas taxpayer dollars to lawsuits from their bad decisions. Their neglect on the coast highway is the worst. The same conditions that lead to Walkers demise still exist today. I'm surprised its been this long since anyone has been run down on that stretch of N Coast 101. Not to even mention the calamity they created on S Coast 101.
Who's next to be run down and killed? I'm sure we will hear about it in the upcoming weeks. So sad.
ABC
If you are going to insult be prepared. I have forgotten more about soils erosion, soils compaction and the multitudes of different soils and their compaction rates than you are aware of. Also, has the leftist State of California required warning signs on the beaches at Sunset Cliffs, Torrey Pines, La Jolla, Pacific Beach?
DeleteHmmmm? Take NOTHING verdict.
Again, how stupid is it to think it's smart to sit at the base of a cliff?
I don't care where you are...it's stupid.
"Leftist?" Pull your head out, 9:01. This neglect goes back to Stocks the right winger. He could not be bothered to safeguard the public and we're no better off under Blakespear. At least Stocks didn't cloak himself in some kind of ideological superiority.
DeleteDon't know your history? Keep quiet and maybe you'll learn something.
Yes, the "leftist state of california". Everything the left does they destroy.
DeleteHow do you explain your friend Stocks?
DeleteI live in the now, not the past. I don't know how this stocks is nor do I care. The only reason I know who the leftist clown blakespear is that fool believes in man made global warming. The lie that keeps on giving.
DeleteSO, who filed the motion to dismiss? Mayor?
ReplyDeleteInquiring minds want to know!?
The mayor's name will be on the motion.
DeleteShe's the face of all the legal crap that goes down: suing residents, asking the court to kill Prop A, firing the fire chief who dared speak up about Streetscape safety issues, "improving" our streets with dangerous road traps.
You name it, that shining little face so happy to tell you what book she's reading instead of keeping us safe has her name on the wrong side of all our legal papers.
This is what happens when a real estate attorney is your trusted advisor.
I hate the lemon causing teachers unions like we have at san dieguito school district. It made teachers as useless as border patrol. Both a now no value welfare jobs, nothing more.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.foxnews.com/us/chicago-teachers-union-vaccine-demand-where-other-districts-stand
*are
ReplyDeleteStepping over the 8:13 Blakespear supporter's sad attempt at deflection and back to the topic.
DeleteOne of the things the city was required to do was have lifeguards interacting with and warning the public. This never happened. A year after the accident one of the Davis family returned to the spot. There sat a lifeguard, ignoring the people sitting sitting against the cliff behind him. This directive not to take action is coming down from the mayor.
Does Gonzalez offer to give the mayor "free" legal advice on this issue, or only when development profits are at stake?
Not falling for that one you sick BIAspear supporters. BIAers have such sick and twisted reverted minds. You like me at This is why....
ReplyDelete*you lost
ReplyDeleteNo, you did. You're just too dumb to know it. But you will eventually. You're just one of those who have to learn the hard way.
DeleteBIASpear guzzler 10:55 - Your not only gross. You are dumber than shit. You remind me of Mosca. Your comment makes no sense, but I think that is the way your mind works. How you figured out how to post on this blog is beyond me. I just you're not completely stupid. Just close.
DeleteABC idiot at 7:28 — No bicyclist has ever been "run down" on 101. Either you are broadly stupid, or you don't understand that in language different words mean different things. "Run down" means there was intent. IOW, the driver purposely hit the bicyclist. The car/truck vs. bicyclist collisions were accidents. No driver intended to hit the bicyclist.
ReplyDeleteBroken record moron at 9:53 — You persist in posting your only ignorant point over and over again. How did Arnold and Wilson do as governors of California? How did Bush II and Trump do as presidents of the US? How is McConnell doing as a Senator? How did Barr do as attorney general? The right is not on the common people's side. They've shown that over and over again, but guys like you are too dumb to see it.
They usually use "mowed down" - Blakespear's painting of the Walker accident.
DeleteThe spotlight should stay where it belongs: on this mayor and council. Blakespear supporters try hard to move the conversation off the topic. That's what they do when they have no game and a real estate attorney running the show.
Nope. They were run down and thats how both Stephanie and Roberta received their serious injuries. They were riding their bike on the road as allowed by law and a vehicles ran them down. Nearly killed them with much pain and suffering. Who is liable will be determined in court, but they were definitely run down.
ReplyDeleteI guess you could say mowed down. That would also be appropriate. There are so many distracted, drunk and stupid drivers on the road today its surprising more people are not mowed down.
Riding in front of cars makes you dumber than dirt, no matter how many times you cry "but it's legal". Using legality to ignore stupidity is a textbook reason encinitans are so incompetent when it comes to common sense survival skills. Better not move to any major cities unless you want to be roadkill within a week.
DeleteBoth incidents were accidents. Nobody was "run down" or "mowed down." 2:27 can't be convinced of that because he's too dumb to listen to facts.
ReplyDeleteMy lord, you are a persistent stupid one aren't you. Call it what you like, but when a bicyclist is riding on the street legally and a driver of a vehicle comes from behind and runs into the bicyclist I call that being run down. Both ladies in the collision were sent flying off their bicycles with multiple fractures and both nearly died. Super bloody and painful and both with head and back injuries. Was is painful and did it severely alter their future life? Why don't you as Stephanie and Roberta those questions? I bet it was and it did.
DeleteWas the incident an accident? I do not know. I was not the driver in either incidents. As I said before, the liability issue will be determined in the courts and what is unbelievable to me is the same hazardous condition that lead to this accident (no bike lanes). Whats a given, is someone else will be run down or mowed down in the future until the bicycle lanes are created. I just hope it's not some young kid with their whole life stripped away by lack of action to address this known hazard. I can not believe this condition still exists today. (Sigh).
Have a good day and please be sure to stay off the hazardous 101 today for live's sakes.
9:03, where is the sheriff's report? Did the mayor have it quashed? I don't mean now when Blakespear can hide behind "can't discuss impending litigation," but after the accident.
DeleteDriver was not cited for anything: not distracted driving, drugs, or alcohol. Funny, that.
Thats a good question. Where is the Sherrifs report?
DeleteEither the sheriff screwed up, or the City or DA are burying it. Which is it?
We know BIAspear loves to operate in the dark shadows.
Both incidents were accidents. The drivers didn't intentionally hit the bicyclists.
DeleteThat's right, 12:46. But that's not the way the mayor and Walker play it.
DeleteMaybe a 20 foot buffer distance from the bluff edge must be imposed. How do you shore up miles of bluff? Basically, it's impossible,so "common sense" must be enforced by authorities. the bluffs will continue to erode and collapse - that's their nature. The lawsuit is all about the money.
ReplyDeleteToo funny (in a sad way) 9:17-
ReplyDeleteIt is the dumbest of times.
9:06 - I sure wish you BIAspear supporters would quit posting your grotesque posts. Please Mosca stay off this blog. Don't tread on us.
7:51 what a disgusting comment. If you know this family (I don't, but have heard of this thing called Google) you'll know they are not hard up for money. What choice did they have when in response to the bluff collapse Blakespear dove under her covers and stayed there?
ReplyDeleteContrast that nonresponse with her crazed and immediate restriping and bollarding in reaction to her buddy Walker's accidents. One death and many injuries later, she's done worse than clammed up. She claims she made improvements.
She couldn't handle the questions early on about the cycle trap. Remember, Blakespearites? Her answer was "Want to hear about this book I'm reading?" Same transparent and juvenile attempt to change the subject as we see here from her followers. Like leader, like follower.
7:51 isn't wrong about the bluffs and I'll add all the beach cliffs. This of course applies to the base of stated bluffs and cliffs. The bottom line is, "don't get near them" !!
DeleteTo place a fine point on things. To pick an average weight of a cubic yard of dirt would be about 2700 pounds plus/minus just to give you all an idea.
Would anyone here take a chance and walk out in front of a moving 2700 pound vehicle? Now, multiply that by how many yards of soil and the rate of speed. Not pretty.
Most people in todays world have the need to place blame. The ONLY blame that can be placed is on the dirt.
Side note, I don't like blakespear, moscow or the others. But you can't blame them for what dirt does.
Moral of the issue, DON'T SIT NEXT TO OR ON THE EDGE OF A CLIFF. Use what little sense the gawds gave you.
BIAspear supporters like 12:54 are so pathetic. Lets get 2,000 more votes in 2022 and send them packin (you know they would love that) to Moscas house of shame.
ReplyDeleteLook to 2022 to stop the destruction of Encinitas Character. It seems like BIAspear supporters have weak character in all parts of their life. Sad but true.
Years ago, the Army Corps of Engineers had proposed a major project to reduce the rate of erosion of the bluffs. Budgetary concerns then side-lined the project and now it is unlikely they'd ever get involved again. A State Legislator has a bill referring to some vague manner of bluff stabilization - it involves the property owners, cities and State. But then the biggest hurtle is the California Coastal Commission, whose policy is to let things erode, claiming that is the natural pattern. Property owners can do nothing to shore up or protect their bluff properties - remembering their adamant opposition over retaining walls of any sort. And then there is the Surf Riders Association, whose anti-bluff protection stance is well known. Maybe this family that lost the 3 members should add Surf Riders and Coastal Commission to the lawsuit too. Short of a massive retaining wall down the coastline, the peril of bluff collapse will remain an inevitability.
ReplyDeleteCatch up, 2:21. CCC is good with language in Bates' amended bill.
DeleteSurfrider used to count Gonzalez as a member until from what I've heard they had a falling out? Anyone who would have him as a member.... Do wonder about the supposed disagreement. Inquiring minds....
https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/local/1-year-after-bluff-collapse-tragedy-in-leucadia-few-improvements-made-encinitas/509-dd9bfb20-0db2-4a79-be6d-f3f055e3c6ab
ReplyDeleteNote Levin's comments on not enough being done fast enough. Hinze was at a meeting between Levin, Davis family. Word from others in attendance was that Hinze completely embarrassed herself by going wildly off topic describing some bird that she had seen at Grandview and musing on whether it was the same one she'd seen earlier from her grandmother's bluffside deck. Awkward all around.
There is no sustainable / guaranteed beach north of Beacon and including the area north of the Grandview. A 6' tide puts the waves up against the bluff in many places and leaves no beach. This has been a fact for years and and is not getting any better. Fuck you assholes saying that the city should guarantee safe beach towel space north of Grandview. There is no safe space north of Grandview, to South Ponto. The warnings have been there for 10+ years. The risk, blame and sad ending belongs to those who set up their beach party in the will-collapse-zone.
ReplyDeleteThe City owes nothing here. Tragic yes, avoidable also... at higher tides, go to South Ponto, Moonlight or anywhere other than a clearly identified - collapsing bluff zone.
It's not much different south of Beacon. The sand dump from Ponto south a few years back took two or three years to wash away. The same thing will happen with the upcoming dump from Europa south.
Delete10:46 You can write without using bad language, it's just fine with us if you try. When you use improper language in a debate, you lose your argument. Try it.
DeleteYes that would be the mayor's real estate attorney advisor posting, 4:22. He can't do what you ask.
Delete10:46 here - as a house-painter, I'm flattered by 9:43.
DeleteAlthough, maybe the Mayor needs a "freshen up". Pressure wash and quick brush coat - no spraying from 10:46!
Fuck no!
The solution is to create a public beach area all along the coast like at Sano Trails. Use eminent domain to create the park space for all the homes west of Neptune and the western side of all the parallel streets to the coast in San Diego County. Assess all the coast to every parcel owner in the County.
ReplyDeleteThe objective beautiful natural coastlines and no developments blocking public access. Go big or go home.
With the unarmored coast line, we would have more natural sand. Next we can open up all the river-mouths from the road and railroad dikes. Let the sand flow again. Sand matters.
All scientists agree that sand does not come primarily or even much at all from cliffs. "Next we can open up from dikes?" You have some kind of in with Newsom? Ain't gonna happen.
DeleteThey are desperate to dismiss this lawsuit because they need the money to build taller sea walls made of used tesla batteries and chicken feathers.
ReplyDeleteSome clownworld character from san diego told them it was imperative to save the word from see level rice
The real problem is that if this lawsuit is successful, the likely government response will be to close beaches, because there's no way they have enough money to do what's being asked of them at every stretch of beach up and down the coast.
ReplyDeleteThe Neptune folks I know are more than willing to take care of their own property within CCC guidelines. Saves the city a bunch and they'd rather spend a small fortune to keep their property than lose their #1 investment.
DeleteForget Surfrider and their agenda. They have long since become a fringe group with way too much sway. Maybe it's the cool name that seems to convey credibility that no longer applies.
Maybe the city should knock it off with the trophy projects costing hundreds of millions. Then they'd have some money left over to keep us safe. But you know that doesn't make for an exciting newsletter or reelection campaign.
you're on your own, quit pushing your sicko site. without clicking on it everyone knows about it anyway. snore.
DeleteBlakespear supporters are a crude and weird bunch. Just look at the husbands. Ignore them.
DeleteIt's quite obvious that the city needs to drain approximately 1' of water from the pacific ocean. To help motivate the mayor, a law suit is suggested. If Roberta's suit has life, surely a suit claiming damages resulting from the mayor's failure to drain the ocean, has a chance.
ReplyDeleteWe all know Roberta is getting millions. We all know the existing hazard. The question is how many millions. 10, 15 or 20 million. You can thank your City Council for not acting on a known hazard. More of BIAspear's failures.
ReplyDeleteWe all know Roberta's making up a good $tory by claiming she was suddenly "confused" by the road signage she passed every day. No "known hazard," just someone not paying attention.
DeletePul-lease.
Oh so what you are saying is Roberta mowed down the car?
DeleteOh, I didn't not understand that to be the case. My bad.
I had thought the driver of the vehicle ran over Roberta and caused all the broken bones in her body including her back in 3 places and major head injury.
Wow. I really hope there was a good investigation and sheriffs report on this one. I can not wait to see it.
My bet is the City will be paying north of $10 million for the failure to address a known hazard. No bicycle lanes on a busy bicycling corridor. The same condition still existing and another run down incident and future payout will happen again in the near future.
Our Mayor is clueless and rather spend her time promoting high density and homelessness.
I'm saying that Roberta wasn't paying attention. Had she come down Puebla and made a complete stop at the bottom of the hill and looked left before entering the 101, she would have avoided being hit. Her accident indicates she instead cut through the post office to avoid having to come to a complete stop and didn't look left and popped out onto the 101 - as she's likely done 100s of times before, with no problem.
DeleteIt was pitch black and she had dark clothing on. You know who I pity? The driver, who has to live with Roberta's permanently-changed life, through no fault of his own. He was not cited for anything: not speeding, not being distracted, not drinking, not doing drugs. The sheriff ignored requests for the accident report for months before the suit was ever filed. Why?
Your "mowed down" scenario plays well in the mayor's newsletter but that's about it.
It's February 2nd 1984 and that foul mouth lady from San Diego is cussing out people with much higher intelligence all over the internets because nobody will listen to her sea level rice conspiracy theories.
ReplyDeleteTrue story
It's frustrating for "warmers" not to be believed. They are convinced it exists and cannot imagine otherwise.
DeleteAfter all, algore said it twenty five years ago, "it has to be true". The rising seas, the oooozoooone hole getting bigger, acid rain. Ohhhh' noooo'.
Sadly, it's been a lie from the get go.
The fraud and lies about "man made global warming", in typical leftist reaction, they get angry. They are convinced. We are doomed. Yet, the tides are the same,
the air pretty darn clean, and Polar Bears thrive.
Darn that truth always ruining everything.
4:47 To begin with, you're an idiot. Then your idiocy is magnified by your ignorance and your denial. The only thing that saves you from universal condemnation is your anonymity. If you have children, they are embarrassed and ashamed of you.
DeleteAnd there it is...proving my point. Notice the "warmer" doesn't debate the issue, they simply go to name calling.
DeleteLeftists...children in adult bodies.
By the way "warmer". Man made global warming is a man made LIE.
We should start calling him "Cramo." Much more descriptive and accurate.
ReplyDelete705 is the type whom believes the new vice president is the most intelligent vice president i history.
ReplyDeleteReality is she is the most inexperienced, stupid ignorant clueless clown in the history of clueless clowns.
Ill circle back in a few years to confirm my anonymous sources
Thank you 9:29 for once again sharing your keen insights. I am trying to learn and was taking notes but got tangled up in the clown stuff. Maybe a good place to start would be a review of the clueless clown history that you build upon. Personally, I get confused when you talk about a "clueless clown". Isn't cluelessness an essential characteristic of all clowns? And then you assign "stupid" and "ignorant" to the "clueless clown"?
ReplyDeleteThis is a clumsy, clownlike effort that results in something akin to a double-negative. Are you saying the Kamala Harris is brilliant? That is the take-away... Frankly, I would not support or disagree with your assertion - it is too early to say anything other than you are not a scary clown but rather a piss-pant clown.
10:23 - Pretty good. You definitely can write coherent thoughts better than 9:29. Meanwhile Encinitas is sliding down the pityfall to PB North. BIAspear is actively promoting all the things in Encinitas that we hate about Pacific Beach. The outcome for Encinitas will be higher density, more crowded conditions, less openspace, less nature, more humans, more homeless, more crime, less peace.
ReplyDelete= less desirable place to live and visit.
ABC
My property has increased more than 100% since Catherine was elected to city council, and more than 50% in value since she was elected mayor. Thank you Mayor Blakespear.
ReplyDeleteIt won't when the stack n'pack moves next to your property, but that's self evident. Real estate agents are freaking out and not in a good way.
DeleteCramo is making out like a bandit as the "entitlements legal advisor" to the monstrosities.
Typical Blakespear-loving Kool Aid guzzler post. Try again.
Doom and gloom. Real estate agents are freaking out because values are insanely high. 946 Eolus in Leucadia is a new 4,000 square foot house, on a .43 acre lot, with no ocean view. It just sold for $5.25M. And you're trying to tell me the sky is falling?
Delete9:06 What good does that do you? Planning to sell and move to a less desirable place where property values are lower? By the way, Blakespear had next to nothing to do with your property value rising.
DeleteMy point is that you're a fear peddler.
DeleteNo doom and gloom. Fact. Pack high density 4' from your property line and lose your sun in your yard/house and see how much your house depreciates - because it will.
DeleteIt's called reality, something Blakespear struggles with.
↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
DeleteFear peddler.
1:10, you're ignoring reality. Must be a delusional right-winger.
DeleteWrong, 1:26. This is a full-on Blakespear flava Kool-Aid drinker who trusts what comes out of her mouth.
Deletetoo bad, the dollar has tanked and all properties that get upzoned are worth more on paper, but none of the existing residents want to live there anymore. BIAspear is doing exactly what LA did 40 years ago.
DeleteFolks are already having to disclose the megaBlake$spear monstrosities when selling. Appreciation, my rear. Only ones making out like bandits are Cramo and company.
Delete9:06 - congrats on your increased book value! The added value is for sure a result of your extra options. Having a mobile home is sometimes a blessing.
Delete↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
ReplyDeleteFear peddler.
Blakespear slave.
DeleteBIAspear is responsible for the destruction of Encinitas. It already way to crowded and sucks compared to five years ago. Everything is packed all the time. With Blakespear's recent upzoning its going to get twice as bad. Twice the crowds, twice the traffic, twice as many people at the beach and in the water, and twice the pollution.
ReplyDeleteYeah - Cost per acres in upzoned areas of Hunghtinton Beach are more then Encinitas. it doesn't mean I want to live there. That place sucks. Plus the dollar is worth 1/2 of what it was five years ago.
So BIAspear sold out Encinitas for a few developer $$$... now we all have to sell our Encinitas property and try and find somewhere to live that used to be like Encinitas before BIAspear sold us all out.
Thanks Blakespear for ruining it for all the future generations. What we didn't need is more crowded Pacific Beach party zones along our beautiful coast. You suck.
Educate 2,000 more voters and the BIA destruction of Encinitas stops. Spread the word.
ReplyDeleteABC
↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
ReplyDeleteFear peddler.
Kool Aid drinker. Sad attempt to protect your queen blakespear. Try again.
Delete↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
DeleteKool Aid drinker. Sad attempt to protect your cult. Try again.
Up-arrow guy is super lame. Nothing to say - just his Gomer Pyle approach to this blog. Shazam!
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSpBwt4hFN8
Every up arrow reply = a Pyle shazam!
Thanks Gomer!
BIAspear is so lame she uses the LA planning model and expects different results. All the current residents that moved from LA and OC know this is not good.
ReplyDeleteBIAspear is responsible for the destruction of Encinitas. It already way to crowded and sucks compared to five years ago. Everything is packed all the time. With Blakespear's recent upzoning its going to get twice as bad. Twice the crowds, twice the traffic, twice as many people at the beach and in the water, and twice the pollution.
Yeah - Cost per acres in upzoned areas of Hunghtinton Beach are more then Encinitas. it doesn't mean I want to live there. That place sucks. Plus the dollar is worth 1/2 of what it was five years ago.
So BIAspear sold out Encinitas for a few developer $$$... now we all have to sell our Encinitas property and try and find somewhere to live that used to be like Encinitas before BIAspear sold us all out.
Thanks Blakespear for ruining it for all the future generations. What we didn't need is more crowded Pacific Beach party zones along our beautiful coast. You suck.
Spread the word - educate 5% of the voters regarding ABC and the destruction of Encinitas stops in 2022.