Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Late-night drunkfest solution: hire another full-time, pensioned government worker!

What part of completely broke don't these people understand?

 On tonight's agenda:
10A.Public Hearing to review and consider: 1) the introduction of Draft Ordinance No. 2014-01 entitled "An Ordinance of the City of Encinitas, California, adopting an amendment to Title 30 of the Encinitas Municipal Code to add Chapter 30.27 - Deemed Approved Alcoholic Beverage Sale Regulations and Provisions for Expanding and Intensifying Alcohol Serving Establishments, and amendments to certain Specific Plans to make reference to Chapter 30.27 of the Encinitas Municipal Code"; and 2) other related actions and activities. CASE NUMBER: 13-271 ZCA/SPA/LCPA; APPLICANT: City of Encinitas; LOCATION: Citywide.  Contact Person:  Planning and Building Director Murphy 

Recommended Action: A) Implement a proactive enforcement program as described by staff; as part of that program, include a single point of contact for the public and identify more efficient ways to report complaints such as adding signage/branding; B) Develop metrics to help track/measure the success of proactive enforcement efforts; C) Delay adoption of the Deemed Approved Ordinance (DAO) to December 31, 2014. Once information from the proactive efforts are collected and evaluated, have the DAO returned to the Planning Commission for review in February 2015; D) Should the Council adopt draft Ordinance No. 2014-01, remove the reference "incompatible uses" under Section 30.27.010(A) attached herein as Exhibit A to Attachment 1 of the Agenda Report; E) Receive an overview of other actions taken by the City to address the concerns raised relative to impacts associated with alcohol serving businesses; F) Consider the proactive enforcement and outreach program described in the Agenda Report. Should the Council wish to implement the program, the required staffing will be presented as part of the FY2014-15 budget process in May 2014 as per previous Council direction.

2014-03-19 Item #10A Public Hearing to Consider Draft Ordinance 2014-01 - Alcoholic Beverage Sale Regulations


How about another idea? A part-time, contract Code Enforcement Officer working Thursday through Sunday, 8pm to closing, paid for by the Encinitas Hospitality Association. If the EHA doesn't want to pay for it, give them the Deemed Approved Ordinance.

54 comments:

  1. So now all citizens can have a code enforcement officer hound them for any reason? Is this what proactive means? Sounds like a Gestapo state in the making!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The deemed approved ordinance makes sense. To turn this into another pensioned employee defies logic.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Go to city hall tonight and BANG YOUR POTS. Bang them so long and hard this damn city comes to a halt. Stop them from spending. STOP THEM!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Have the Sheriff's Office do their job. Then we shouldn't need another employee. The Sheriff has all the authority it needs to take care of the problem. No more money or ordinances needed.

    - Bill

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They're too lazy to do foot beats.

      Delete
  5. The city solution or is it the hospitality association's idea is to have the code enforcement officer inspection the bars once a month in the three summer months and then once every three months for the other seasons. Also the community residents would be required/voluntarily attend meetings with the bar owners/representatives to discuss the problems.
    Council - approve the deemed approved ordinance now! Stop with the placating these bar owners.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pick a bar, bang pots outside that bar until 10 pm.( which is the legal time to make noise, after that it's prohibited), the pot banging will stop people from entering that bar and put the hurt on the bar owners pocket book. Do that night after night after night. Bang pots outside Coast Law Group. Make Marco pay attention to the problem. If he complains tell him you will go to one of the bars on the 101. Bang Pots. When their wallet hurts they'll start addressing the problem of TOO much noise.
      Fight fire with fire.
      Fight noise with more noise.

      Delete
    2. Bang a pot in front of the Saloon and you're likely to lose half your teeth...

      Delete
    3. How about just picketing, and get it on the news? Probably a little more effective...

      Delete
    4. Picketing?? That's for pussies!! You'll be laughed at . Bang pots and the bar owners will sit up straight and find solutions.
      Don't be a pussy!!

      Delete
    5. i tnink half the people in the saloon have lost their teeth

      Delete
  6. We need DEEMED APPROVED ORDINANCE! Try moving downtown and see what we are dealing with, it is growing like tentacles of an octopus and it is not fair to just stall on this matter any longer.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 99% of the city's residents actually like the city the way it is and enjoy its amenities. The other 1% hang out on this blog and just complain.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 9:48 doesn't live near downtown obviously.

      Delete
    2. interesting you do- apparentl you are concerned word is leaking out- the city is broke, Vina and Barth Gaspar Muir are to blame

      We need a forensic accounting of our books!

      Delete
    3. If that's the case, 99% of the citizens are in the dark.. Spread the word - read ENCINITAS UNDERCOVER!

      Delete
    4. I don't live near downtown and I am disgusted with this city. I appreciate Mayor Barth stating the downtown residents are not the only ones in affected by increased noise, traffic, trash, density/crowding, and general debauchery. The complaints are coming in from all over the city.

      Delete
  8. I cannot help but wonder if this is the work of Marco Gonzales. He is chair of this so called Encinitas Hospitality Group, who were supposed to enforce the laws already on the books. They don't want to, so we citizens get to pick up yet another employee with benefits. Nice going Marco.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I don't favor hiring another full time employee. A part time code enforcement officer retired. That wasn't made clear in the staff report last time this issue came before Council.

    More and more employees will be retiring as our city ages. We are going to end up paying for new employees, for retired employees, and for numerous contractors and consultants, all to do the same job. So paying three for the job of one!

    Tony Kranz was correct, before. If the City Manager cannot guarantee a late night/weekend shift, then a new employee for code enforcement is unnecessary. A full time position is unnecessary in any case. The Sheriff, bar owners and Hospitality Association patrol should do their jobs.

    When Council voted AGAINST hiring another FTE, before, Council and the public were told this would come back in May, with more strategic planning, and budget priority setting. Hey, it's not May, yet!

    Vina wants another full time Code Enforcement Officer. He wants to beef up his "administration" and his executive powers, at taxpayers' expense. Some employees are retiring EARLY because of issues with Vina and his cabinet. To many citizens, and employees, they seem like interlopers, coming down from Sacramento, or from other non-local areas, including out-of-state, to Encinitas, to tell us what to do and how to do it, and how much to spend on doing it.

    Operating expenses have been skyrocketing. The City Manager has not been doing an excellent job, but our Council is too close to him and the City Attorney to be able to have an objective perspective in their unanimous evaluations, uninformed by public opinion of these overpaid, self-interested "public servants."

    ReplyDelete
  10. Lynn is absolutely right in her assessment that some employees are retiring early because of Vina. That means they will get full pensions, as they can retire, they might just not have been ready to. With Vina at the helm, and the Council not reigning him in, many City employees are saying Fuck it, I'll retire, get my benefits and find another job.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, they're saying they're going to retire. Unless you're in select areas like medical and pharma, there is no one hiring. Unemployment in the real world is running 15%-20%. Trust me, they're probably just planning on retiring.

      As for the bar problem, how about the people of downtown getting together and picketing some of the worst offenders. That will get their attention. Unless you hit them in the wallet, they won't do anything...

      Delete
  11. Vina must go! Another pension leech... enough!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Vina is clueless ....

    Fire this nightmare .

    We need to cut employee costs not grow them...

    ReplyDelete
  13. Maybe some of the council needs to be recalled to wake them up.

    ReplyDelete
  14. How does one go about recalling a council member and who do you want to recall?

    ReplyDelete
  15. If the 5 council members can't step up to the plate and do the job we elected them to do, then they all need to be recalled. They are in charge of making the decisions. NOT the city manager. Get it straight council. You oversee the city manager. Do your damn job or get out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How come we didn't recall Stocks, Bonds, Dallagher, Guerin? A recall is a pretty serious action, I don't anybody on the council is worthy of that, and I'm pretty disappointed in the current efforts of the 5. You will have a chance to make a move in November, when the mayors new seat and the other council seat come up.

      -Mr Green Jeans

      Delete
    2. It's a shame those other idiots Stocks, Bonds, Dallagher and Guerin were not recalled. They ruined this city, but gained a nice pension from us. That's all they wanted.

      Delete
    3. Er, the city council guys don't make much of a pension, but Guerin used her time here to get a gig with Brian Bilbray. I'm sure she has a pension with the Sherriff's Dept...

      -Mr. Green Jeans.

      Delete
    4. Guerin is a ladder climber as someone else posted. The only way that woman made it on the sheriff's department is because her present husband was her instructor. Otherwise, the weak thing would have never made it. He taught her how to use the system -- claim an injury and get paid disability for the rest of your life. Nice gig in the department and nice gig with Bilbray (she was totally unqualified for that position). Living off the public sector.

      Delete
    5. 2 council people will vote against the new FTE tonight: you don't like them, so you won't give them any credit.

      Delete
    6. Council all voted for a part time position for a new Code Enforcement officer. But the money, as WCV states, is to come from savings "in other departments."

      The issue was bifurcated. The DAO will be considered at a later time after the City can determine if more proactive enforcement is effective.

      Delete
    7. Green Jeans council members get healthcare for their families for life - worth probably 1,200 a month .........pretty good

      Delete
  16. I will give anyone credit who votes against another full time employee. I wrote to all 5 council members, as well as Kathy Hollywood, expressing my opinion about voting against a new hire. Since I can't be at the meeting, I thought it was the best I could do. Whether they take my suggestion is another matter. I thought the Encinitas Hospitality Group was supposed to take this on? What happened, if anything? And, if they do vote for another Full time person, I hope that person will be assigned to work at night when the occurrences occur. Another daytime employee is a waste of money in this case. Just my 2 cents, and it isn't worth much these days I can assure you.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Is the council hiring a new code enforcement officer in their motion?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, but Muir proposed it had to come from the existing budget, and council agreed.

      Not sure if that's an irrelevant accounting distinction, or would actually cause real cuts elsewhere.

      WCV

      Delete
  18. Taking money for a new position and pension is just more money that could have fixed roads and decaying infrastructure. The wasteful spending never ceases.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Gaspar doesn't mind taking home calls from her bar friends, so I suggest every one get her number, keep it close to your bedside, and call her at 2:00 am when you are awakened by all the drunks. If she doesn't answer, call Kranz and Muir. Seriously, this is the only way they will understand what we are going through.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Call her at 2 am?? Why?? Go bang pots outside her home at 2 am. Let neighbors hear the noise. When the sheriff arrives tell them you found those pots in the street and were moving them off to the side. Lie to the sheriffs.
      Then leave in your car. Go to another council persons home and bang pots until they call the sheriffs. Tell the sheriff, " oh officer I was driving down this road and saw these pots in the street, I am moving them to my car so no one gets hurt, sorry about the noise". Then leave and return to Gaspars house, dump the pots in the road and drive away. Pots and pans are cheap. Buy them at any garage sale.
      When the council is awake all night, along with their neighbors, they will do something....

      Delete
    2. 9:41 I think your idea is a great one and I hope everyone reads your suggestion and follows through with banging those pots and pans right outside the council members' homes at 2 a.m. Why should they get a good night's sleep?

      Delete
    3. 9:41 What is your facination with banging pots? Have you actually ever gone to City Hall and done it or anywhere else?

      Delete
    4. 6:41 I think 9:41 is indicating that you fight fire with fire. In the case of downtown, you fight noise with noise. At least that is the way I interpret it. It's a clever idea actually. I'm all for pots and pans banging.

      Delete
  20. Marco is NOT the chair of the EHA. in fact, his involvement with EHA ceased long ago.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is good to see that even EHA has some standards!

      Delete
    2. I question the veracity of Marco being "gone." He's bound to be slithering around somewhere and we'll no doubt see him again and associated with bars, before long.

      Delete
  21. Is the Beach house restaurant closed?? Or closed for remodeling??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Last report was that the Beach house restaurant was closed and gone.

      Delete
    2. The Beach House is relocating to the former Tomiko restaurant site on Encinitas Blvd.

      Delete
  22. The Encinitas Hospitality Association is a shadowy organization. No information on their board. Nothing. Nada. Zip.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe they are part of the Leucadia Club now

      Delete
  23. Last night one of the speakers mentioned that St. Germain was sold to the owner of the Union.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Encinitas will turn into nothing but a "bar" town. A lot of good restaurants are leaving and no wonder. It's hard to compete with the bar people.

    ReplyDelete
  25. "Will turn into"? Already is. Be proud, council, be very proud. You did that.

    ReplyDelete
  26. And they parade things are better when complaints get hijacked instead of acknowledged. See who gets the pensions, the same ones that deal in smoke & mirrors and stonewall citizens.

    ReplyDelete