Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Encinitas Right to Vote leader endorses Kranz and Shaffer

Olivier Canler is one of the organizers behind the Encinitas Right to Vote (on increasing neighborhood density zoning). Without the initiative, a 4/5 majority on the City Council can decide to put an apartment building right next to your single-family home.

Here is Canler on the Council candidates:
-Lisa Shaffer and Tony Kranz are the preferred candidates. They will listen to the residents, are concerned how the General Plan Update can change our communities, and are supporting the idea of having the community being engaged in a meaningful way in future land-use changes. They both want to maintain our beach-town character, and want to preserve open spaces and our precious natural resources. Beyond the General Plan they are very familiar with issues facing our city. They will bring fiscal responsibility to our council.

In contrast, Jerome Stocks and Kevin Forrester are pro-growth and are backed by special interests made of developers (most are out-of-town). They have very little regards for what residents want when it comes to growth. Mr. Stocks has been quoted saying things like, "This is just a planning exercise, none of these units have to be built", or "I'll try to respect community character". Mr. Forrester, a realtor and attorney, specialized in mitigating land-use disputes, is more blunt: He does not believe the public should be involved in zoning exercises adding that these exercises are best left to the "professional planners". He wants to expedite the planning process. Here is what Mr. Forrester said to the Union-Tribune: "The biggest challenge facing the city of Encinitas is re-establishing the policy-setting role of the City Council in land-use planning, and avoiding the takeover of planning by a vocal minority of Encinitas citizens". Characterizing the people behind the Right-To-Vote Initiative as a vocal minority is offensive and a gross distorsion of the facts. In reality, most Encinitans are deeply concerned about further developments in our town.

Both Mr. Stocks and Mr. Forrester strongly oppose the Right-To-vote initiative.

Mark Muir is all over the map when it comes to zoning changes. He takes credit for the reboot of the GPU (when the vote was unanimous and it did not take a genius to understand that this plan was vastly unpopular). He is not in favor of density bonus but does not support the Right-To-Vote Initiative. He is also aligned politically with Jerome Stocks and Kevin Forrester. We can't trust Mark Muir.

The other candidates, Barb Yost, Brian Ziegler, Thomas Brophy, are all concerned about zoning changes. Their hearts are in the right places. All three support the Right-To-Vote initiative but are newcomers on the Encinitas public scene. I would encourage everybody to visit each of these 3 candidates website and decide for yourself.

8 comments:

  1. Thanks, Olivier. I'm voting for Barb Yost as the third candidate. I don't feel it's necessary to "bullet vote," which, from my perspective, makes it more likely that Stocks could get the third seat, as he has in the past. Most people reading here know NOT to vote for Stocks or Forrester, I hope!

    I hope lots of people will come for oral communications at the next Council Meeting. There is a possibility that Jerome will be absent, again.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What is a "bullet" vote? I voted for Barb Yost - a throw away vote. Ziegler was too police state and Brophy can't articulate his positions very well. Yost provided the best comic relief, so she got the extra vote. Dump $tock$ and fire Muir; no to Forrester too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You ask a good question!!! However, it's never a bad idea to vote for whomever you really think can do the job on Encinitas City Council. So far, Lisa Shaffer and Tony Kranz are my choices.

      Delete
  3. You want comic relief.. Re-elect Stocks then write-in elect Lynn. There's comic relief forya. I'll pay to watch those council meetings!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am voting for Shaffer, Kranz, and Yost too. I have to tell you though that the whole Jim Kydd encinitaselection.com thing has caused a credibility problem. Talk about opening a door for Andreen and Company to come right on in and take the stage and claim a moral high ground!! Very poorly conceived.

    If you don't know what has happened, this story covers it (and look at Andreen's rantings in the comments!)

    http://www.northcoastcurrent.com/encinitas/2012/10/20/newspaper-publisher-quietly-steps-into-the-political-fray/

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm voting for Shaffer, Kranz, and Yost too. I considered Brophy because he brought up the ERGA problem at both forums that I attended. He's well informed on this golf course near bankrupcy that has screwed the Encinitas Ranch HOAs, but he needs more experience on other city issues.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I placed my vote for Kranz, Shaffer and Yost. As a society, we need to look beyond presentation and packaging and consider what the candidates stand for. I think that Yost has the most resident-centric platform, so I am voting for her position as much as I am voting for her.

    This campaign is almost as bad as the notorious clown suit attack. Just watch. Tony will get in because this attack on him will gain him even more sympathy. Go Kranz!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Here in 2022, this was so naive. What made Kranz change his viewpoint so drastically?

    "-Lisa Shaffer and Tony Kranz are the preferred candidates. They will listen to the residents, are concerned how the General Plan Update can change our communities, and are supporting the idea of having the community being engaged in a meaningful way in future land-use changes. They both want to maintain our beach-town character, and want to preserve open spaces and our precious natural resources. Beyond the General Plan they are very familiar with issues facing our city. They will bring fiscal responsibility to our council."

    ReplyDelete