Two men were stabbed in Encinitas late Saturday night, Feb. 19, a sheriff’s official said.
Deputies responded to a bar on South Coast Highway, south of E Street, to a reported stabbing just before midnight, Lt. Chris Galve said.
The deputies provided first aid, and paramedics took at least one of the victims to a hospital, Gavle said.
Bar patrons had detained the suspected assailant, and deputies took him into custody.
That’s the block of Biergarten and 1st Street Bar. Online commenters are saying it was 1st Street.
Midnight - the bewitching hour in downtown, where the knifes come out.
ReplyDeleteIn keeping with the downtown theme, the blade was vibrating as it entered.
ReplyDeletepencil dick strikes again...
ReplyDeleteThat is vibrancy for you.
ReplyDeleteThe blame rests on a sold out council with their always willing sold out planning dept. seniors leading the way.
Welcome to bar town north county.
I will always respect and sympathize with the group of downtown residents who organized and tried to prevent and protect our once special downtown from the PB bar owners 'style' of degradation.
1st Street Bar has been there for decades... yet the blame for the stabbing falls on the shoulders of the city council? explain...
DeleteOf course, Marco represents the bar owners with all their dark sided maneuvers to make profit off bar activities. We have to remember - Marco is an attorney and attorney's do and say anything to make a buck. Forget about that bar patrons have a higher change of public health diseases than non bar patrons and drunk bar patrons have a much higher propensity for throwing cigarette butts on the ground that wind up in our mother ocean.
ReplyDeleteDo BIAspear, Mali or Marco care? NOT today! It doesn't fit with their narrative to have a Vibrant (drunk, tweaked, and stoned date raped) Downtown.
How do you know when an attorney is lying?
Now that Encinitas Politics has shut down, I wonder where the Bobbsey twins will end up?
ReplyDeleteWow. The Facebook page run by Blakespear's biggest supporters and former campaign managers shuts down within 2 weeks of Mali's toxic, out-of-control behavior being called out at a Council meeting - twice. Coincidence?
ReplyDeleteThey knew she would lose control again and don't want to have to defend her when older ladies show up at the meetings with screenshots and quotes. Even they know she's a liability to Encinitas.
DeleteBlakespear's gross incompetence and cronyism is on full display as her tenure as Mayor limps and hobbles on to its finale. she hopes to hop the State Senate gravy train, where she can perfect her lopsided and inappropriate policy concepts. Is Speedy Gonzales in the jump seat too? They both smell more possibilities to sell out.
ReplyDeleteVerdu still has Encinitas Now Facebook page and any other(s) he cares to resurrect/create when the time comes. He's not going to sit by and "watch 2022 from the sidelines" as claimed. No way. Any threats to Catherine or Mali and he'll be back more vicious than ever. He has no right to anyone's trust.
ReplyDeleteVerdu is not behind Encinitas Now. And after the public lashing the Verdus have received during the mayoral election and beyond, can you blame them for wanting to step away?
DeleteI can blame them for causing the public lashing because they brought it on themselves. They never owned up, using the passive "sorry this happened" not "sorry we did this." I can blame them for leaving up Mali's toxic posts for days, then taking credit for taking them down. I can blame them for seeing the light not because they know they did wrong, but because their platform backfired, they made themselves neighborhood pariahs and that doesn't feel tood to them. That's the only reason he's stepping away.
DeleteAs far as Encinitas Now: it walks like a duck and quacks like one, too. He also had Encinitas Forward but that recently disappeared.
you act like they are evil villains in a comic book. I think EP really did try to be fair. They deleted Omed's comments about Cindy Cremona and they urged people not to be personal about Julie Thunder and stick to the issues... give them a break, it probably became very stressful. Let them walk away. I am not a fan of theirs and I hate PACs, but the good bye posts they all put on EP were pretty open and feel genuine.
ReplyDeleteDeleted Omed/Mali/Marco DAYS after they'd been posted. Doesn't count dude. There is nothing genuine about Verdu if you followed him two years ago he alternated between encouraging the most disgusting vitriol then acting disturbed by it. Why not take the site down today if he's so sincere? Why the extra month for the It couple to have access to his outlet?
Delete10:59 yeah being an asshole tends to bring stress. It's called karma.
DeleteYou know, even when people are involved in politics, there are other things in their lives besides politics. They are probably quitting their group for some personal reason and it must be super important because every admin in their group is leaving the group.
ReplyDeleteAmazing there is anyone left to defend them.
DeleteWe need a GOOD facebook group. The Verdus were slanted left and Encinitas Votes is run by a narcissitic crazy lady who claims she is a psychologist but her license was revoked. (Just google her. it's easy to find, plus really bad reviews her patients left)
DeleteUh huh. The Verdus were much more than "slanted left." They were the willing vehicle for every lie, innuendo, and toxic claim that Gonzalez, Omed, and Mali could make. Throw in Zenick and Fox for good measure.
DeleteThe Verdus were gleeful in their perceived role as kingmakers. They created their site for the sole purpose of keeping Queen Catherine and her council attendants in place.
Now no one decent will have anything to do with them and they feel sad? Karma, baby, karma.
12:17, who are Zenick and Fox? What have I missed?
DeleteOut of curiosity, why is that page sooooo bad, when you have pages like Encinitas Votes and Watchdog are much more insulting, whiney, rude, etc? Is it because you guys all hate the same people, or is there something Im missing? Sour grapes from the last election maybe?
ReplyDeleteHypocrisy bothers some people more than others is my guess.
DeleteEncinitas Politics was a small group (less than 400 people) made mostly of Blakespear and developer fans who got kicked of Encinitas Votes for being assholes. They had a beyond self-important attitude and were the definition of an echo chamber. Encinitas Votes and Watchdogs are not in the same category. Watchdogs is mostly Trumper anti-vaxers who all agree with each other. Votes is a discussion forum where people actually disagree and debate.
DeleteSo you are obviously an EV member 1:20. It is absolutely not simply a place where people actually disagree and debate.
DeleteI joined EV during the mayoral election because I wanted to learn about both candidates. I came to the group as a blank slate with an open mind. As I read through the threads, I was shocked by the ugliness in tone from both sides. Maybe you don't notice it when you're always in it.
So I posted my first comment and said I came here to learn, but am surprised by the tone. That's all I said. I'm surprised by the tone. No inclination about who I may be for or against (because I wasn't for or against anyone yet!)
My comment was answered by Pam Slater Price, who immediately said "Go back to your mothership, Blakespearbot" and Steve Houbeck who accused me of being a fake acct because my friends list is private.
Really? No one welcomed me to the group, nor defended me. I, who did not even vote for Blakespear, was called a Blakespearbot because I was overwhelmed by the negative tone.
The way Pam answered me PROVES the negative tone. The way longtime members say really vicious things all the time and Lorri Greene ignores it because they've gotten to know each other through the group is a huge problem.. There is little to no moderation in that group. No one ever says "you're making a good point, but can you do it without the ad hominem?" The moderators themselves have made inappropriate remarks about council members, the mayors family, and private citizens. Lorri truly believes this is a "space for everyone", but Lorri, you've let so much slide that I have to tell you "everyone" does not feel welcome, and everyone does not feel safe sharing their point of view.
You know what I noticed about Encinitas Politics? Read through their threads very carefully. When they had to step in and moderate, their language was very neutral. Lorri can not say the same.
"Go back to your mothership, Blakespearbot"
DeleteShe most definitely has a good sense of humor.
Good grief you just may be a bot and not know it based on the words you have written.
Best advice would be to work on improving your mindset, regroup your brain, focus on the solutions and not the problems, and become open and transparent (not necessarily here like Marco does) but definitely on fakebook and screwtube.
Cheers alfi
Pam Slater's toxicity is matched only by her irrelevancy. It's comical that the Encinitas Votes crowd thinks the greater voting public cares what they say on their hate blog.
DeletePam Slater Price's behavior on social media opened my eyes. I voted for her and supported her and now she insults people and belittles them, she uses childish names instead of addressing issues. She has no idea how that behavior has actually hurt the people and causes she wants to support.
DeleteThe way she,Bob Nichols (AKA Jason Michelski), Rachel Graves and crew behaved over and over again on social media did way more to hurt Thunder and Turney's campaign than the Verdus ever could. Instead of being reactive and defensive to that idea, just take a step back and CONSIDER that it might be true. Then adjust how you campaign for those trying to unseat incumbents and you might actually succeed. What could it hurt?
Why ANYONE would listen to someone who wears that much lipstick is beyond me.
DeleteI don't get it either. People have different points of view, but we're all just people! I've had enough of conspiracy theories and assuming the worst of people just because they support a different candidate.
ReplyDeleteDifferent points of view does not explain the Verdus' complicity in vile attacks and trail of slime. Not even Stocks acted as they did and that's going some.
DeleteThere's slime all around. Jeff Morris created slime that benefitted Julie Thunder and she pretended she didn't know about it. They all attacked Blakespear because PACs supported her, while ignoring the PACs that tried to get them in and the incumbents out. Protesting outside the mayor's house isn't slimy? Stalking and taking photos of homeless isn't slimy? Jeff Morris harassing and posting photos of private citizens only because they support a safe lot isn't slimy? Making money off of concrete while pretending you're against development isn't slimy?
Delete1:42 what aboutism doesn't get around the trail left by Verdus. Try to stay on topic. You sound like Gonzalez losing it on a good day.
DeleteEncinitas Now is definitely another Verdu site. Posting all over: Zenick, Barths, Chatfields, Omed...the usual suspects. Verdu protests too much over his closing of Politics. He's simply moving operations over to Now.
ReplyDeleteLorri Greene said multiple times on EV that Verdu is not a part of Encinitas Now.
DeleteEncinitas Now seems a pretty benign group. "What's the best Encinitas pizza?" and that kind of stuff. Not even very many political posts there and it's not very active. Also, you know you can use the search function in groups, right? CHatfield shared mayor posts a year ago? Gonzalez is kind of active there, though. No Verdus. Not a lot of activity. Look, I'm not a supporter of PACs or the ads the Verdus sent out, but reading through Encinitas Now and Encinitas Politics, there's not much to see to get outraged about. Encinitas Now pushing restaurants and local feel-good stories is not a Verdu/Trojan Horse threat.You are all too quick to jump to a conspiracy mindset.
DeleteLook again on Encinitas Now. And who cares what Greene says? Look at the site, it's identical to EP. Virulence the same and just wait till the It couple show up.
DeleteLook, I don't have a dog in this fight, but when you say the virulence is the same, I guess I just don't see it. And the names you listed that are "all over that page", I'm not seeing them either.
DeleteThen you're not looking at the right page.
DeleteI'm Zenick. I have nothing to do with the other people you're mentioning, and they'd tell you the same. This is Encinitas Watchdogs being the crappy people they seem to be. If they can find someone to pick on, maybe someone won't realize they're a group of idiots.
ReplyDeleteNope, just watching your snide comments on Encinitas Politics and Votes for months now. No need to invoke Watchdogs, your nasty comments are all yours to own. Even as Verdu is making his fake apology and everyone having a lovefest you just can't help yourself "It's too bad we'll all have to listen to the same 10-15 voices that supposedly represent Encinitas online now." You are a toxic woman, own it.
DeleteYou shouldn't focus so much on me; that's the toxic element. I'm just a person commenting like everyone else. I meant what I wrote there, so sick of reading the same people posting the same shit over and over, wherever they can. You're welcome to disagree, but at least EP made an effort to include people that don't feel the same as what EV and Watchdogs have to offer. And I will call out Watchdogs specifically, because they have issues with stalking and intimidating people that disagree with them.
Delete2:19 Does it occur to you that saying "You are a toxic woman, own it." Is itself toxic?
DeleteShe expresses her opinion online. So do you. Who cares? You're not exactly holding back and being super polite here.
So why is she toxic and you aren't? What's the difference?
2:30 This is how it works in Encinitas, apparently. If you're an asshole all day everyday online but hate our mayor and council, you're justified. If you have any other opinion, you're toxic. Especially for women, apparently (based on the attacks I've seen).
DeleteNo, it doesn't occur to me. Verdu having a lovefest and Zenick just has to stick her knife in. She can act above it all but that remark is typical and shows just how thin her veneer of civility really is. There is literally nothing that Mali could do wrong in her eyes that speaks volumes.
Delete2:42, you're incorrect. I started paying attention to Encinitas politics during the last election. I didn't seek out people to defend, I saw people online that I agreed with on issues. With Mali, I felt an orchestrated attack on someone that hasn't done worse than offend a few people was creepy and totally out of line. If it happened to someone with different political views, I'd do the same. A group ganging up on a single person is bad, no matter how they align politically.
Delete"a few people"? Mali has offended thousands if not tens of thousands of people on Encinitas Votes, Encinitas Politics, Encinitas Now, and NextDoor. In addition to calling all 1500+ members of Encinitas Votes racist, she's told people who support Prop A (which won by a vote of the people, by the way - so, tens of thousands) that they are wrong and outdated. And she's accused all white people in Encinitas of blindly suffering from white privilege. So yeah, she's offended more than "a few" people. Her loud and aggressive words come across as ageist, racist, and mean-spirited. (The stuff on Watchdogs is out of line, but that's a fringe group that doesn't represent most of Encinitas residents.) Recent attacks weren't orchestrated - she just managed to piss off a critical mass of people who are tired of her antics.
Delete2:42 you're making a lot of assumptions. And, I get it, this is how you feel and you think you're right.
ReplyDeleteYou see her comment as "sticking a knife in", but others may not read it that way. She's just sharing how she sees it just like you are. So, somehow, you're justified in attacking her, but she's not justified in anything she says?
And how do you know that Mali could do no wrong in her eyes? That's a pretty big assumption. You can't know that. You can only assume that.
This kind of rhetoric is TOXIC. Assuming people's feelings and motivations is dangerous. You are creating a narrative that might not be true and you won't budge from it.
I see people hating the mayor and that spills into anyone who agrees with any position the mayor holds.
It's completely wrong to treat people as evil just because they disagree.
Calling her toxic while you yourself feel justified in behaving in toxic ways is such a double standard.
The most important part is that I'm not running for anything, will never run for anything, and have no power over anything that could possibly concern you. I'm another Encinitas resident commenting, and that's it.
Delete2:50 she just replied above she sees nothing wrong with Mali's behavior. What else should we assume other than she in fact believes Mali can do no wrong?
Delete3:30...Do you have reading comprehension issues? Where did I say any person can do no wrong? My issue is a group of idiots ganging up on a person (whatever person) for political gain. And that's what you were attempting to do. Address me directly if you have any real claims, please.
Delete"Me?" Grandiosity issues much?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Delete"me"is default, wasn't intentional as a title. I think it's fixed now.
Delete3:56, if you're whining about me on this thread, shouldn't you address me directly? I'm here, so no need to type to others about me on a pubic thread.
ReplyDeleteNo whining, just observation. Enjoy the spotlight.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThere would be no "spotlight" if you were able to STFU. If anyone gives a shit about me, it's you. And I have no idea why.
ReplyDeleteYou are a racist for saying that. Shame, Shame, Shame. Go back to your racist hole Zenick.
ReplyDeleteZenick - Did you vote for the black man who made his on living last election or did you vote for the privileged white man trust-funder raised in the "elite SF society" that preaches the same old rhetoric that keep the black man down?
ReplyDeleteRead this closely- All humans are created equally.
*own, keeps
ReplyDeleteHere is the proper use of STFU- Thank you EG
ReplyDeletePetition Circulates to Tell Encinitas Deputy Mayor to STFU
“Honestly,” said Olivenhainian Horace Chestnut, “I’ve never heard anybody talk so much and say so little.”
Chestnut directed his comment to Encinitas Deputy Mayor Joe Mosca. Chestnut felt so strongly about the issue that he started a petition demanding that Mosca STFU.
https://yourencinitasguerrilla.blogspot.com/ or link to the left.
Yes, proper use by a non-Blakespearbot!
DeleteBlakespearbot is the creepy one.
DeleteThere's something wrong when you have to constantly delete posts. Think Zenick and Woods-Drake, Gonzalez when he remembers his management doesn't approve.
ReplyDeleteDon't believe the propaganda put out by Gonzalez, Blakespear, Zenick about how great Mali Woods-Drake is. Get a gander for yourself from a speaker at last week's council meeting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?fbclid=IwAR0Mi1tWJL3arfceLibZMtXKMpIsGtHgUNX_CU_v1K7YdBdgrDbzhOM
ReplyDeletebQwU&v=raofX_keYqA&feature=youtu.be
Anyone supporting this poison needs to rethink priorities. Or own they're equally poisonous.
Coming from a youtube channel made by Jeff Morris, judging from the tiktok video shared prior to this one. He needs medication or an intervention or some kind of medical help asap. I'm serious. Lots of red flags in his posts and actions.
DeleteThe Youtube was clipped from the city website. If you need that official source to believe your eyes and ears, here you go;starts about 6:57: https://encinitas.granicus.com/player/clip/2667?view_id=7&redirect=true
DeleteI have to say I'm flattered you guys. I didn't realize so many people were paying attention to my opinions, especially so closely. Creepy and strange, but still a bit flattering.
ReplyDeleteIt's the spotlight she craves, attention good or bad just attention.
Delete5:25 & 5:26, people that are so weak that they resort to anonymous name calling don't have a lot of room to criticize. Your words mean nothing if you're too much of a coward to attach your name to them.
DeleteAwww you learned that line from Marco didn't you. Next thing we know you'll be calling everyone "keyboard warriors." Creepy creepy.
DeleteYes hysterical anonymous random person, you called it.
DeleteSo what if it's anonymous? What matters is the content, not who posted it. Argue the point, not the person.
Delete7:19 really specific to those defending Blakespear/Mali is a shoot the messenger attempt at defense. The message comes through, they don't like it, they get all spun out on who wrote the message rather than whether the message has any validity to it. That and name calling ("elitist, racist, privileged) is where you go when you have no fact based response.
DeleteIf someone posted interesting content with some sort of point, it would be good. 5:45 is taunting and insulting, and there is no response to that.
DeleteThat is not Jeff's channel or Watchdogs and the same video can be found on the City's site starting around the 9:50 minute mark.
ReplyDeleteIt's the content that matters, if it makes you feel better here is the link:
https://encinitas.granicus.com/player/clip/2667?view_id=7&redirect=true
I thought it started earlier, but at any rate it is from the city's video and part of the record. Inconvenient truth for Mali lovers out there.
DeleteI hope all of you know these are the MEDS talkin'.
ReplyDelete