I am very disappointed in the Council if they gave a "heads up" to Sabine. I offered all 5 of them information that was negative about Glenn. I suggested they put it out to bid and see what other firms has to offer and at what price. Guess they didn't do this? I'm working so haven't see the meeting. Does anyone know how it went down?
Kranz is mezmerized by all the sparkly diamonds that go round and round on Sabine's Rolex. If Kranz is good, Glenn lets him watch them for a reward....opporant conditioning.
All I can say is Sabine must have shit on everyone if he is allowed to stay. Dr. Lori told me a long time ago that in 1 year we spent 1 million dollars on him and he still lost about half the cases. Sick.
No more votes for existing Council. Off with their _____s......
I know.... you might want to strategic plan for another 3 years since all our tax money goes towards the ever increasing staff costs and none to projects.
Did meagan compare drunk drivers running stop signs with self realization peoplengoing to temple? Did meagan compare transients and drug addicts with people going to walk the srf garden? Did megan compare tour busses visiting the srf with pub crawls vans? I got no opinion on this issue, but that comparison was ridiculous.
Is anyone else tired of hearing the egotistical holier than thou speech making of the high density lawyer marco gonzalez trying to sound superrior to everyone and drum up busines? Blah blah blah..............s...ssssssssssnake.
Lady speaking after Sheila completely out of balance. Talking to herself...wtf?? Sit down. Put herself through school working in a restaurant now opposes restaurants.
Downtown is out of balance, most new businesses are bars, it is what it is. Also, del mar is dying becuase the rents are too high for business to make it, that is why they want to upzone main street for high density apartments
Saloon owner says he was blind sided during holiday week on the issue, wonder what he thinks of the city raiding 15 accounts of $7 million during july 4th 2012 to start the hall park.
Saloon owner has hundreds of thousands tied up in his expansion, something Barth, Muir, Shaffer nor Sheila could never understand. Losing 14 hours per week of sales will destroy his business.
Said saloon owner also needed the cops to tell him he was 30% over capacity. Funny, he didn't look blind. He needs the cops to tell him what's going on his own bar and wants folks to think he's sincere about addressing the downtown issue??
Moratorium won't impact existing businesses, sorry your argument of the sallon is BS. Dennis Holz calling it like it is, land use, land use! Norby and Vina with the high density land use overlay! Holtz calling out Marco Gonzalez for saying his cell umber is the solution. I've never heard this Holz guy, he's making sense, Holtz for mayor?
Holz is nothing more than the same lawyer/opportunist as Marco: only he does so under the color of the SRF. Ask him about charging folks for spiritual cleansing in Idlewild.
Even he had to admit on the dais that Sheila was looney-tunes. Plus, his friendship with Stocks will come to light: plus his front yard filled will antique gas guzzlers says it all Greenies.
He is the personification of 'situational ethics', he gave many a friend an economic break when he and Sheila and Christy ran riot over the City from the council dais. Business is bad, watch for Holz to run for Mayor: donate a coupla bucks and get a coupon on your soul's dry cleaning. Ask Holz about the night he ran out of Sheila's house in fear for his reputation.
Lynn Marr, Sheila Cameron, Donna Westbrook and Bobby Virk for Council in 2014. Mad Women of Chaillot?
9:26 - now that's funny! If Lynn Marr, Sheila Cameron, Donna Westbrook and Bobby Virk all were elected to Council in 2014, they would get the biggest wake up call in their lives. They would realize how difficult it is to change the course of city governance. Within 6 months all their supporters would be crying foul and feeling abandoned - not because these 4 changed their principles, or moved to the dark side, but because they would be faced with the realities of governing. You can hate Stocks all you want, but he knew how to pull the levers of governance. You're better off finding someone as knowlegable as Stocks that is more aligned with your world view.
Now that's funny! Sculpin who trolls and demeans others for posting anonymously continuing to throw mud at others while hiding behind an online persona. What da ya say big Sculp- time to step out from the shadows?
Ohhh another shot at gonzalez and coast law. Speaker asks how can gonzalez and coast law support destroying community charcter....the answer is because they don't live there,. Same as Desert Rose
I am also disappointed with this council that many of us worked hard and long hours to get elected. What I realize now is Teresa had it easy before, She knew she could vote with the people and her vote would still be negated by the male majority. Now, she has the power and what is she doing with it? Between she and Vina I call it micromanaging our lives to fit their ideas of what is good for us, whether we like it or not. Shaffer is disliked by SANDAG and I am not sure what the other 3 are doing. I almost wish Jim Bond were back on the Council. he seemed to be somewhat reasonable,even I didn't agree with him. Even Jerome had clout with SANDAG. Something that Shaffer will never have. She seems to not have good playground skills. They are all of our Council members, and they seem to not be doing what we elected them to do.
Sandag? Sandag is spending $40 million to promote annexing encinitas back into san dieog and push high density. Stocks would love it. He and Bond might wellnhave banrupted the city, we will know more in a few weeks.
The Encinitas CC and staff should be looking out for Encinitas residents--#1. Nobody is disputing that business that offer goods services to residents are important, but they shouldn't be allowed to degrade an entire community.
By their actions, Gus Vina and his staff are #1, and they, with the help of Peder Norby, are extracting value from every corner of our city and selling it to the highest bidder. Those funds go to their pockets and pension funds!
If some drunk is at .18 and want to do 5 more shots before going home and raise his blood alcohol level to .25, I rather he drive and leave Encinitas at .18 than have more drinks at drive and possibly kill someone driving at .25.
Isn't there a law already on the books that says if a bar staff member or owner deems the person too drunk, they cannot serve him or her anymore alcohol? And it is their responsibility to call a cab if the person drove there? If it is a law, then why doesn't the sheriff enforce it? Isn't that what we pay them to do?
Why is it that all the council members need to glorify themselves? Gaspar references being a CFO and having a cramped hand from taking notes. Shaffer lectures everone with he self importance, Muir talks about sitting at the table or being on the menu..............won't touch one. Kranz talks about doing his research. Gaspar thinks 9 new licenses is not proliferation, hmm? I do agree if a license is in process they should be grandfathered in.
I also feel a license in process should be grandfathered in. And the "cut off" proposed by Lisa Shaffer for licenses "in process," should be 11 p.m., which I believe they requested, not the arbitrarily "set" by Shaffer, 10 p.m. These restaurants which continue to serve food are not the problem, in my opinion.
You know the argument with guns? Establishments serving alcohol don't cause problems, human nature does! Dennis Holz is correct about the lack of infrastructure, that is PARKING, causing many issues. When people are parking and being loud in residential neighborhoods, it becomes an issue.
We should establish a shuttle service that operates at the Kraken or somewhere similar, with parking? Monterey and Seattle both have free bus service, downtown, and that has helped, tremendously, for them.
Shaffer slaps Gaspar, Gaspar recommends a non existent non recognized committee report back, then they let Marco Gonzalex violate roberts rules of orders, then Barth makes the motion to direct a non city, non recognized, non existent tonreport back, and the council approves. The blind leading the blind.
Sabine runs inteference about 4/5th needed. Muir and Gasapr likrly to oppose. Again, Gasapr banking on a non recognized entity to be directed to respond. Boozers win, moratorium will be kicked down the road.
This council is paralyzed, unable to make important decisions always trying to compromise on anything, trying to please everybody and yet alienating everybody in the end. Why do they always have to kick the can down the road. Too wimpish for me.
This was on the ABC website and Encinitas is on the moratorium list. If ABC has stopped issuing alcohol licenses for off-sale for wine and licenses, why are they continuing to issue for on-site sales?
2011 Moratorium Figures – Section 23817.5 B & P Code
On January 1, 1998, Section 23817.5 was amended to permanently establish a moratorium on the issuance of off-sale and wine licenses (Type 20) in cities and counties where the ratio of Type 20 licenses exceeds one for each 2,500 inhabitants. In the city and county of San Francisco, the ratio has been established as one for each 1,250 inhabitants. The San Francisco computation combines off-sale beer and wine license with off-sale general licenses for the purpose of establishing the ratio. Enclosed are the following lists and a map showing the new Type 20 license limitation data: o List of Counties with their moratorium status. o List of Cities in Counties with partial moratorium status. o Summary of Changes to Moratorium Counties/Cities. Please note the changes in moratorium counties compared to the 2005 list. There have been changes in some of the cities within the current 11 non-moratorium counties. The new moratorium lists are effective as of May 9, 2011 and will be in effect until recalculated in approximately five years, in accordance with Section 23817.9. The enclosed lists and map may be distributed to all interested parties.
The council vote 5 to 0 to "request" the Hospitality Committee to come back in 45 days with recommendations. The council then voted separately 3 (Barth, Shaffer, Muir) to 2 (Kranz, Gaspar) to bring back a modified 45-day moratorium next week, city wide and closing hours at 10 pm. Neither required a 4/5 majority. There will be a 4/5 majority needed to impose the moratorium. Will the 4 votes be there next week? Kranz said he wasn't in favor of the moratorium.
The suggestion for a modified 45-day moratorium to be brought back next Wednesday excluded any alcohol-serving place that closed at or before 10 p.m. The purpose was to grandfather in the lobster place and any other similar place that has its permits in process.
If the Hospitality Committee comes back in 45 days with a plan, and the council approves the modified 45-day moratorium next Wednesday, the two gears are out of sync by seven days.
Yes. He did.... at least 1/2 revenue from food. How is that enforced.
I don't believe it. The booze and wine portion of the meal is always higher than the food. What is the definition of "Food" sales?
City Council better get their shit together and reverse the years of damage done by Stocks and clan.
I think everyone agrees downtown Encinitas IS heading in the BAR direction, and almost ALL residents do NOT want Encinitas to turn into Pacific Beach Norte.
The raving praise for Sad Sack was pathetic. I hope this Council can pull their head out and turn this City around. It is clear they support a pour choice for City Manager. I just think Teresa will not admit it because she was on the selection committee.
Only hope now is to vote them out and/wait another 1.5 to 2 years until Sad Sac retires and hope the damage is not too great.
Now I really appreciate all the active Citizens of Encinitas. We need to stay on Council and Staff because its obvious they are willing to pour Encinitas down the drain and give the quality of life to the few bar owners who enjoy huge profits at others expense. I can't believe I am saying this but that even includes the frequent comments from Lynn Braun. At least there are citizens check going on and the citizens have finally finally awaken.
Since there is no money for any more projects beyond the budget sucking Regional Sports Park, the next major move will be to remove Gaspar from office in the next election. Lets rid Encinitas of all Stocks bad habits. Citizens should also voice their displeasure with Sad Sack. He continually recommends poor choices to City Council. Why didn't the City remain more neutral on Prop. A?
THANK YOU BIG TIME to all the citizens that spoke to preserve our laid back beach town atmosphere and try and prevent it from becoming PB Norte.
Keep up the good work folks. There are definitely coyotes in our hen house, and Council is feeding the coyotes.
After opposing any moratorium, Gaspar turned around at the end an said she would support a 10pm moratorium for new licenses but in the end voted against taff to come back with new text. Seems to me she is confused!
I am disappointed that they have such low standards. It makes sense that Vina and Sabine are fighting to keep the standards low, because where else will they find such a sweet deal?
I am talking about council. It is as though there is a race to the bottom to find out how bad Vina and Sabine have to be before they are asked to improve.
Most companies try to have a process of continuous improvement. In Encinitas, they look for continually lower standards and the protection and increase in the number of unqualified people. Looking at some on staff can remind one of when the mad Emperor Caligula made his horse a senator.
Vina is doing a great job at leading the council. I would give him an A on running the fiscal affair if the city to the ground.
ReplyDeleteDerisive audience laughter in the overflow room...guess Teresa's infatuqtion with all things Vina endures...at the expense of the community.
ReplyDeleteRecall time.
ReplyDeleteWhen will the tax paying citizens run these 5 morons out of town?? Shameful.
ReplyDeleteI am very disappointed in the Council if they gave a "heads up" to Sabine. I offered all 5 of them information that was negative about Glenn. I suggested they put it out to bid and see what other firms has to offer and at what price. Guess they didn't do this? I'm working so haven't see the meeting. Does anyone know how it went down?
ReplyDeleteYour 5 council members LOVE the city atty.
Deletethey are idiots but they are YOUR council members.
Kranz is mezmerized by all the sparkly diamonds that go round and round on Sabine's Rolex. If Kranz is good, Glenn lets him watch them for a reward....opporant conditioning.
DeleteShaffer is constantly confused and behind the 8 ball. Make you wonder if she reads the reports prior to the council meetings.
ReplyDeleteWhat happened to Barth and Shaffer's comments to supporters that they intended to get rid of Sabine--before Shaffer and Kranz got elected!
DeleteWhat has changed to make staff suddenly competent, when they had promised to shake things up and get rid of people once elected?
All I can say is Sabine must have shit on everyone if he is allowed to stay. Dr. Lori told me a long time ago that in 1 year we spent 1 million dollars on him and he still lost about half the cases. Sick.
DeleteMaybe she needs to wear her mortarboard hat to the meetings - she got her degree in Oz.
DeleteNo more votes for existing Council. Off with their _____s......
ReplyDeleteI know.... you might want to strategic plan for another 3 years since all our tax money goes towards the ever increasing staff costs and none to projects.
Sad Sack and Sad Council. Boooooo
I smell lawsuits coming over this bar moratorium. Sabine loves defending the city, chaa ching
ReplyDeleteI'm bored watching this council meeting. I'm off to Union for some beers and Betty's.
ReplyDeleteNew owner of old Baracuda grill giving a commercial for his place to the council.
ReplyDeleteRestaurant and bar owners out in force tonight....
ReplyDeleteAnd I thought all these people were there for Prop A. It is about the booze and need to keep it flowing
DeleteThe damn train makes more noise than any of these bars. Council needs to stop pandering to whiny people.
ReplyDeleteDid meagan compare drunk drivers running stop signs with self realization peoplengoing to temple? Did meagan compare transients and drug addicts with people going to walk the srf garden? Did megan compare tour busses visiting the srf with pub crawls vans? I got no opinion on this issue, but that comparison was ridiculous.
ReplyDeleteWhere is the copy or video of this analogy rant? Sounds very odd indeed....
DeleteBunch of quality drunks addressing council. Just a suggestion, cut your alcohol intake in half, it's already taking a toll.
ReplyDeleteIs anyone else tired of hearing the egotistical holier than thou speech making of the high density lawyer marco gonzalez trying to sound superrior to everyone and drum up busines? Blah blah blah..............s...ssssssssssnake.
ReplyDeleteIt's more like $$$$$$$nake.
DeleteHe gets paid by the word, be thankful he's not your neighbor.
DeleteFunny: 8:26
DeleteWhere are the supporters of this moratorium???
ReplyDeleteMarco Gonzales representing developers and drunks.
ReplyDeleteNot to mention, Filner's victims:
Deletehttp://www.utsandiego.com/news/2013/jul/10/attorney-calls-on-filner-resign/
Sheila says downtown out of balance.... She would know about out of balance......
ReplyDeleteLady speaking after Sheila completely out of balance. Talking to herself...wtf?? Sit down. Put herself through school working in a restaurant now opposes restaurants.
ReplyDeleteDowntown is out of balance, most new businesses are bars, it is what it is. Also, del mar is dying becuase the rents are too high for business to make it, that is why they want to upzone main street for high density apartments
ReplyDeleteI can't take this anymore. This council has already made up its mind what will happen, all this talk is for not.
ReplyDeleteHalftime coming up at 9 pm. Time to make booze run.
ReplyDeleteSaloon owner says he was blind sided during holiday week on the issue, wonder what he thinks of the city raiding 15 accounts of $7 million during july 4th 2012 to start the hall park.
ReplyDeleteSaloon owner has hundreds of thousands tied up in his expansion, something Barth, Muir, Shaffer nor Sheila could never understand. Losing 14 hours per week of sales will destroy his business.
DeleteSaid saloon owner also needed the cops to tell him he was 30% over capacity. Funny, he didn't look blind. He needs the cops to tell him what's going on his own bar and wants folks to think he's sincere about addressing the downtown issue??
DeleteBet he has a bridge to sell, too.
Dude, the saloon owner doesn't lose anything with a moratorium, he loses no rights he now has.
DeleteIt is about the money. Drink and prosper!
ReplyDeleteMoratorium won't impact existing businesses, sorry your argument of the sallon is BS. Dennis Holz calling it like it is, land use, land use! Norby and Vina with the high density land use overlay! Holtz calling out Marco Gonzalez for saying his cell umber is the solution. I've never heard this Holz guy, he's making sense, Holtz for mayor?
ReplyDeleteHolz was mayor, Dalager won his spot and it's been downhill ever since.
ReplyDeleteHolz is nothing more than the same lawyer/opportunist as Marco: only he does so under the color of the SRF. Ask him about charging folks for spiritual cleansing in Idlewild.
DeleteEven he had to admit on the dais that Sheila was looney-tunes. Plus, his friendship with Stocks will come to light: plus his front yard filled will antique gas guzzlers says it all Greenies.
He is the personification of 'situational ethics', he gave many a friend an economic break when he and Sheila and Christy ran riot over the City from the council dais. Business is bad, watch for Holz to run for Mayor: donate a coupla bucks and get a coupon on your soul's dry cleaning. Ask Holz about the night he ran out of Sheila's house in fear for his reputation.
Lynn Marr, Sheila Cameron, Donna Westbrook and Bobby Virk for Council in 2014. Mad Women of Chaillot?
9:26 - now that's funny! If Lynn Marr, Sheila Cameron, Donna Westbrook and Bobby Virk all were elected to Council in 2014, they would get the biggest wake up call in their lives. They would realize how difficult it is to change the course of city governance. Within 6 months all their supporters would be crying foul and feeling abandoned - not because these 4 changed their principles, or moved to the dark side, but because they would be faced with the realities of governing. You can hate Stocks all you want, but he knew how to pull the levers of governance. You're better off finding someone as knowlegable as Stocks that is more aligned with your world view.
Delete- The Sculpin
Now that's funny! Sculpin who trolls and demeans others for posting anonymously continuing to throw mud at others while hiding behind an online persona. What da ya say big Sculp- time to step out from the shadows?
DeleteSculpin like to hide between rocks in the murky depths, and only come out to get a tasty shrimp, octopus or small fish.
Delete- The Sculpin
correct- in the mud
DeleteOhhh another shot at gonzalez and coast law. Speaker asks how can gonzalez and coast law support destroying community charcter....the answer is because they don't live there,. Same as Desert Rose
ReplyDeleteYou can decompress and eat after work between 10 pm and midnight. How many establishments serve food after 10pm?
ReplyDeleteStop the PBisation of Encinitas.........
I am also disappointed with this council that many of us worked hard and long hours to get elected. What I realize now is Teresa had it easy before, She knew she could vote with the people and her vote would still be negated by the male majority. Now, she has the power and what is she doing with it? Between she and Vina I call it micromanaging our lives to fit their ideas of what is good for us, whether we like it or not. Shaffer is disliked by SANDAG and I am not sure what the other 3 are doing. I almost wish Jim Bond were back on the Council. he seemed to be somewhat reasonable,even I didn't agree with him. Even Jerome had clout with SANDAG. Something that Shaffer will never have. She seems to not have good playground skills. They are all of our Council members, and they seem to not be doing what we elected them to do.
ReplyDeleteAnd what is that this little group is trying to accomplish? Seems like you are trying shape the community solely based on what's good for you.
DeleteSandag? Sandag is spending $40 million to promote annexing encinitas back into san dieog and push high density. Stocks would love it. He and Bond might wellnhave banrupted the city, we will know more in a few weeks.
DeleteWhich group? The bar owners want profit, the residents want community character. Depends which group you are for, boozers or property owners.
DeleteIf SANDAG doesn't like Shaffer, I love her even more.
DeleteSANDAG is the enemy to local control.
The Encinitas CC and staff should be looking out for Encinitas residents--#1. Nobody is disputing that business that offer goods services to residents are important, but they shouldn't be allowed to degrade an entire community.
DeleteBy their actions, Gus Vina and his staff are #1, and they, with the help of Peder Norby, are extracting value from every corner of our city and selling it to the highest bidder. Those funds go to their pockets and pension funds!
The comment about increasing DUIs was classic.
ReplyDeleteIf some drunk is at .18 and want to do 5 more shots before going home and raise his blood alcohol level to .25, I rather he drive and leave Encinitas at .18 than have more drinks at drive and possibly kill someone driving at .25.
What a stupid argument.
Isn't there a law already on the books that says if a bar staff member or owner deems the person too drunk, they cannot serve him or her anymore alcohol? And it is their responsibility to call a cab if the person drove there? If it is a law, then why doesn't the sheriff enforce it? Isn't that what we pay them to do?
ReplyDeleteI think Gaspar had her nose chopped as predicted.
ReplyDeleteHere is my next prediction. She gets booted next election, just like her mentor Jerry Stocks- the insurance salesman.
Why is it that all the council members need to glorify themselves? Gaspar references being a CFO and having a cramped hand from taking notes. Shaffer lectures everone with he self importance, Muir talks about sitting at the table or being on the menu..............won't touch one. Kranz talks about doing his research. Gaspar thinks 9 new licenses is not proliferation, hmm? I do agree if a license is in process they should be grandfathered in.
ReplyDeleteI also feel a license in process should be grandfathered in. And the "cut off" proposed by Lisa Shaffer for licenses "in process," should be 11 p.m., which I believe they requested, not the arbitrarily "set" by Shaffer, 10 p.m. These restaurants which continue to serve food are not the problem, in my opinion.
DeleteYou know the argument with guns? Establishments serving alcohol don't cause problems, human nature does! Dennis Holz is correct about the lack of infrastructure, that is PARKING, causing many issues. When people are parking and being loud in residential neighborhoods, it becomes an issue.
We should establish a shuttle service that operates at the Kraken or somewhere similar, with parking? Monterey and Seattle both have free bus service, downtown, and that has helped, tremendously, for them.
Looks like the council learned a new word from Prop A. Gaspar and Barth like the sound of Bifurcate
ReplyDeleteThey started that word with rutan and tucker making wild "bifurcation" claims over Prop A and now it's used for everything.
DeleteShaffer slaps Gaspar, Gaspar recommends a non existent non recognized committee report back, then they let Marco Gonzalex violate roberts rules of orders, then Barth makes the motion to direct a non city, non recognized, non existent tonreport back, and the council approves. The blind leading the blind.
ReplyDeleteWhat was gonzalez doing up at the podium, who asked him up there? Our council are puppets for Vina, Sabine and high density bar attorny gonzalez.
DeleteInteresting, The beer garden is seeking to expand, looked to me like planning director murphy was trying to run cover.
ReplyDeleteWho's on first? This is painful!
ReplyDeleteSabine runs inteference about 4/5th needed. Muir and Gasapr likrly to oppose. Again, Gasapr banking on a non recognized entity to be directed to respond. Boozers win, moratorium will be kicked down the road.
ReplyDeleteWhat happened to the 4/5th needed for a vote? The boozers are loud and obnoxious headed out, Marco leading the pack! Celebration down at the Union!
ReplyDeleteThey are headed out to meet Norby, Vina's buying rounds after his glorious job performance.
DeleteThis council is paralyzed, unable to make important decisions always trying to compromise on anything, trying to please everybody and yet alienating everybody in the end. Why do they always have to kick the can down the road. Too wimpish for me.
ReplyDeleteSpineless.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteThis was on the ABC website and Encinitas is on the moratorium list. If ABC has stopped issuing alcohol licenses for off-sale for wine and licenses, why are they continuing to issue for on-site sales?
2011 Moratorium Figures – Section 23817.5 B & P Code
On January 1, 1998, Section 23817.5 was amended to permanently establish a moratorium on the issuance of off-sale and wine licenses (Type 20) in cities and counties where the ratio of Type 20 licenses exceeds one for each 2,500 inhabitants.
In the city and county of San Francisco, the ratio has been established as one for each 1,250 inhabitants. The San Francisco computation combines off-sale beer and wine license with off-sale general licenses for the purpose of establishing the ratio.
Enclosed are the following lists and a map showing the new Type 20 license limitation data:
o List of Counties with their moratorium status.
o List of Cities in Counties with partial moratorium status.
o Summary of Changes to Moratorium Counties/Cities.
Please note the changes in moratorium counties compared to the 2005 list. There have been changes in some of the cities within the current 11 non-moratorium counties.
The new moratorium lists are effective as of May 9, 2011 and will be in effect until recalculated in approximately five years, in accordance with Section 23817.9.
The enclosed lists and map may be distributed to all interested parties.
The council vote 5 to 0 to "request" the Hospitality Committee to come back in 45 days with recommendations. The council then voted separately 3 (Barth, Shaffer, Muir) to 2 (Kranz, Gaspar) to bring back a modified 45-day moratorium next week, city wide and closing hours at 10 pm. Neither required a 4/5 majority. There will be a 4/5 majority needed to impose the moratorium. Will the 4 votes be there next week? Kranz said he wasn't in favor of the moratorium.
ReplyDeleteMaybe Kranz has some celebration planneed in the the next 45 days and does not want to miss on the action.
DeleteThe suggestion for a modified 45-day moratorium to be brought back next Wednesday excluded any alcohol-serving place that closed at or before 10 p.m. The purpose was to grandfather in the lobster place and any other similar place that has its permits in process.
DeleteIf the Hospitality Committee comes back in 45 days with a plan, and the council approves the modified 45-day moratorium next Wednesday, the two gears are out of sync by seven days.
No, the votes won't be there. This council is pouring Encinitas down the sewer.
ReplyDeleteThe 3rd Corner wine bar/restaurant has restrictions on its license. The owner didn't mention them when he spoke to the Council.
ReplyDeleteYes. He did.... at least 1/2 revenue from food. How is that enforced.
DeleteI don't believe it. The booze and wine portion of the meal is always higher than the food. What is the definition of "Food" sales?
City Council better get their shit together and reverse the years of damage done by Stocks and clan.
I think everyone agrees downtown Encinitas IS heading in the BAR direction, and almost ALL residents do NOT want Encinitas to turn into Pacific Beach Norte.
The raving praise for Sad Sack was pathetic. I hope this Council can pull their head out and turn this City around. It is clear they support a pour choice for City Manager. I just think Teresa will not admit it because she was on the selection committee.
Only hope now is to vote them out and/wait another 1.5 to 2 years until Sad Sac retires and hope the damage is not too great.
Now I really appreciate all the active Citizens of Encinitas. We need to stay on Council and Staff because its obvious they are willing to pour Encinitas down the drain and give the quality of life to the few bar owners who enjoy huge profits at others expense. I can't believe I am saying this but that even includes the frequent comments from Lynn Braun. At least there are citizens check going on and the citizens have finally finally awaken.
Since there is no money for any more projects beyond the budget sucking Regional Sports Park, the next major move will be to remove Gaspar from office in the next election. Lets rid Encinitas of all Stocks bad habits. Citizens should also voice their displeasure with Sad Sack. He continually recommends poor choices to City Council. Why didn't the City remain more neutral on Prop. A?
THANK YOU BIG TIME to all the citizens that spoke to preserve our laid back beach town atmosphere and try and prevent it from becoming PB Norte.
Keep up the good work folks. There are definitely coyotes in our hen house, and Council is feeding the coyotes.
Barth has let the position go to her head - time for her to go.
DeleteAfter opposing any moratorium, Gaspar turned around at the end an said she would support a 10pm moratorium for new licenses but in the end voted against taff to come back with new text. Seems to me she is confused!
ReplyDeleteDefinitely Confused. Time to vote her out in the next election.
ReplyDeleteDennis holtz Nailed it. You should run for council again next time!
ReplyDeleteHe certainly did. Holz is a lawyer and understands things better than anyone on the council.
DeleteGot traffic??
ReplyDeleteBlame Holz.
What's that comment about?
ReplyDeleteJust more distractions. I think Dennis would be a great councilmember
ReplyDeleteEven the title of this blog post gets me sick..... Council is soooo far off base.
ReplyDeleteTerm limits for sure. Next election by Gaspar and Barth.
Terms limits for next election.
ReplyDeleteGaspar and Barth are both gone!!!
Darth Vader on council would be an upgrade.
ReplyDeleteEncinitas leadership .... may the farce be with you!
ReplyDeleteI am disappointed that they have such low standards. It makes sense that Vina and Sabine are fighting to keep the standards low, because where else will they find such a sweet deal?
ReplyDeleteI am talking about council. It is as though there is a race to the bottom to find out how bad Vina and Sabine have to be before they are asked to improve.
Most companies try to have a process of continuous improvement. In Encinitas, they look for continually lower standards and the protection and increase in the number of unqualified people. Looking at some on staff can remind one of when the mad Emperor Caligula made his horse a senator.
When will this ever end?