Shootout at the Lone Jack Corral: Vilkin says Upton drew first

They really take that Old West stuff seriously in Olivenhain. Remind us not to rustle any horses out there.

10 News:

Within the past week, Vilkin said that Upton had threatened him and that he called the San Diego Sheriff's Department to report it. That incident was the reason he had a gun with him when he went back to his property Thursday, said Vilkin.

Vilkin said Upton was obsessive about privacy and had demanded he not cut the greenery, even though Vilkin said the greenery is on Vilkin's property.

10News called the sheriff's Homicide Unit to confirm Vilkin's story, but they said they were not commenting on the matter.

On the day of the shooting, Vilkin said he was trying to cut some shrubbery on his own property, but Upton came out of his house and confronted him.

According to Vilkin, Upton pulled out a gun and told him to stop cutting.

Vilkin, who was also armed, said he pulled out his own weapon and shot Upton once in the stomach. To his surprise, Vilkin said Upton kept coming at him and that's when he said he shot Upton gain, this time in the head.

"I shot him; you know, I predicted him to fall immediately because this is a .44-caliber Magnum. He did not, he did two or three steps toward me and then I shot him in the head," Vilkin said.

"It was self-defense; I did not go to him. He came to me threatening and pulled a gun at me. I did not go to him. I stayed away on my property," Vilkin added.

Business as Usual at City Hall

Dietmar Rothe in the Coast News:

It has only been a few months since our new City Council took office.

We, the tax paying citizens, had great hopes that the new council members would bring fresh air and light into city chambers darkened by shameless backroom dealings.

Recent council meetings have shattered that expectation. It is now only too painfully obvious that pro-development and special interest groups still hold their 20-year-old stranglehold on our public resources, expecting to reap huge profits on taxpayers’ expense and feeding on the public trough, while destroying the unique character of our five communities forever.

Pick up a copy of Coast News this weekend and read the whole thing. Dietmar lays out plenty of evidence of backroom dealings as usual.

In related news, the council has written the opposition to Right to Vote, and still has not committed to showing us their alternative before the vote. Bait and switch, anyone?

Murder on Lone Jack UPDATE: Michael Vilkin arrested, John Upton victim

Patch:

A person of interest was detained after a man was found dead with a gunshot wound to the head Thursday morning, according to Lt. Clayton Lisk, of the San Diego Sheriff's Department.

The death in the 2900 block of Lone Jack Road was reported at 9:06 a.m., he said.

This is believed to be Encinitas' first murder of 2013 and the first since September's vehicular fratricide.

UPDATE: A dispute between neighbors?

It happened around 9 a.m. in the 2900 block of Lone Jack Rd., Reportedly it may have been a confrontation between two neighbors.

The victim, who reportedly suffered a gunshot to the head, died at the scene. His name was not immediately available.

As of late morning, deputies had several people in custody for questioning, Lt. Mike Munsey said. It was unclear if the detainees were considered suspects or witnesses, according to Munsey.

The Channel 6 web site photo focuses on homes at 2926 and 2916 Lone Jack.

UPDATE: According to Fox 5, the man's body was found here on the dirt path between 2926 and 2916, and the man was wearing a jogging suit.



UPDATE: Domestic dispute?

UPDATE: The U-T reports that a "family spiritual adviser" said that the victim had saved thousands of Romanian children. That sounds like filmmaker John Upton, who lives about a quarter mile a way and could have been using the path on a morning run.

UPDATE: Michael Vilkin arrested:

Deputies questioned then arrested Michael Vilkin, 61, of Encinitas, on suspicion of murder, officials said.

A weapon was also recovered.

“We believe he’s involved, but we are not exactly sure what the dispute was and the nature of the dispute that led to this,” Bolwerk said. He added that there were no outstanding suspects.

Vilkin owns a vacant lot near where the shooting occurred, according to property records. Authorities said it was unknown if the victim and Vilkin knew each other prior to the encounter.

Vilkin went through city planning in 2009 and 2012 for demolition and redevelopment of a house at 2920 Lone Jack that had been damaged by a hillslide.

Officials and the dead tree media are still not naming the victim. If it is John Upton, here is more about his significant charitable accomplishments.

UPDATE 3/29: U-T confirms, it's John Upton.

Upton’s brother, Michael, said there appeared to have been an ongoing dispute between the men — possibly involving trees.

“I can’t imagine why somebody would want to shoot my brother in the head,” Michael Upton, of Clairemont, said Thursday evening as he drove to the site of the slaying.

“He was a good man. He saved a lot of kids,” the brother said of John’s enormous rescue effort of Romanian orphans. “Here’s a guy who went into a communist country and basically didn’t allow himself to get bullied by the government and corrupt people over there. And he took these kids who were crippled from birth defects from trying to be aborted, and brought them back to the United States to get medical care and get adopted.

“My brother was a fearless crusader.”

The slaying was a double-blow for the family. Upton’s mother died just hours earlier Thursday of natural causes.

In this undated biography from the social media site Helium, Vilkin describes himself as a founder and college administrator at the unwieldily named and apparently defunct "www.business-school-online.us."

In-N-Out Urge

The long-rumored arrival of In-N-Out Burger to replace the old Del Taco at I-5 and Encinitas Boulevard is here.  Patch notes it will also take over 305 and 325 Encinitas Boulevard, which are Oggi's and Valero.

While the iconic SoCal burger joint is eagerly awaited by its fans, some local residents are concerned about traffic at the already congested intersection.  No doubt many Carlsbad commuters and visitors from Orange County and LA  will pull off the freeway for a Double Double.

It's a valid concern, but it doesn't seem reasonable to deny the replacement of an unpopular restaurant with a popular one just because more people will want to go there.



And this site, unlike the Leucadia I-5 Starbucks/Subway complex approved by the last city council, has adequate parking.

Council coming around on Right to Vote?

The first public commentary from the council since the vote to oppose the Right to Vote Initiative came in this morning's weekly newsletter from Mayor Teresa Barth. She writes:

Our council discussion brought agreement to eliminate the 4/5th super majority exemption, a change we felt should be implemented regardless of the June ballot results. Also, support for my suggestion to add General Plan Updates to our existing voter approval requirements, changed my initial reluctance to take a council position on the Right-to-Vote initiative. I agreed to be on the subcommittee with Councilwoman Gaspar to write the statement against. It is my intention to include the council's commitment to these changes, including placing those changes on the Nov. 2014 ballot for voter approval (which would prohibit future councils from changing the codes) in the council's statement.

Councilman Tony Kranz has also indicated support of a cleaned-up, substitute right-to-vote ballot measure on the November 2014 ballot. It's a welcome signal from the council. If the supposed flaws in the current initiative are real, let's have the option to vote on an improved version.

Any replacement right-to-vote initiative would obviously have to be finalized and approved by the council before the June special election. Otherwise, they'd be selling us a pig in a poke.

UPDATE: Councilwoman Lisa Shaffer is up with similar supportive thoughts.

Council votes to pave Desert Rose

3-0 with Shaffer abstaining and Muir absent. After Shaffer's abstention, city attorney Glenn Sabine clarified that her abstention would count as a Yes vote.

At 3:53:40 of the video, Kranz asks about whether they can have further discussion about the type of firewall to be used in the project. Sabine immediately shows him who's in charge:

The communication has to take place within the context of this proceeding, and we want the proceeding to end tonight, and you're going to have to make a decision on that.

Things that make you go hmmm...

If the City Council actually supported the spirit of Right to Vote and only opposed the initiative due to supposed "flaws," why wouldn't they put a second initiative on the same special election ballot that was clean, stripped out the flaws, and addressed solely the central problem of the 4/5 council supermajority loophole?

Silence speaks volumes.