From the Inbox:
To: City Council Members, City Attorney, City Manager, Code Enforcement Department, Planning Department, Encinitas Sheriff, Fire Marshall, and local Newspapers
From: Encinitas Citizens Committee
Re: Continuing noise problem & safety concern in downtown Encinitas
Over the years, the Encinitas Citizens Committee has sent numerous emails to City Council, Code Enforcement, and Planning Department. We hoped that actions would be taken to significantly reduce the public disturbances that occur on our downtown streets, especially on weekend nights, at or around bar closing time.
We have high hopes that the new City Council, led by a new Mayor, a new City Manager, a new Fire Marshal, and new Sheriff will spearhead a campaign for a safer, quieter Encinitas! But we want you to know the reality of the situation.
Although we will no longer send a list of specific complaints, please be advised that problems of late night noise and concern for the safety of Encinitas citizens still exist. It is extremely frustrating for the ECC to send Code Enforcement example after example of the same kinds of infractions or to repeatedly report these problems to City Council. In the past only small steps have been taken and these efforts have not produced meaningful improvements. The hoped-for peaceful co-existence between late-night bars and residents trying to get a good night's rest has not happened.
We appreciate that a Code Enforcement officer has been hired to devote half his time to the late night drinking problems, but he has still not identified the real issues. Also, insufficient actions have been taken on the ones that have been identified. These issues are:
The over-serving of alcoholic beverages to inebriated bar patrons. The noise problem created by drunks that disturb citizens late at night. The safety issue when intoxicated individuals drive in and around Encinitas.
Examples of insufficient action:
1. The PACE program sends a team out to inspect the bars only once a quarter most of the year. Unfortunately problems of over-service, overcapacity, customers blocking sidewalks, and DUIs occur year round--they are not just occurring in the summer any longer. No officer did inspections in December despite the fact that the week of Christmas and New Years is undoubtedly one of the busiest times of the year.
2. Code Enforcement rechecked Union to see if their barstools and chairs were illegally removed again (after repeated violations and finally being issued a $100 fine). This inspection was ineffective because he checked during the day when the majority of Union's business is serving food, not alcohol. Obviously Union doesn't remove their chairs and barstools in the morning!!! Astonishingly, a resident told us that on Sunday, January 11th at 11:00 pm he saw barstools on Union's patio again! The $100 fine made no difference when this business can make significantly more by ignoring the violation. It's nothing more than a slap on the wrist.
3. Bars that have never received citations were inspected first. By the time the Code Enforcement Officer got to Shelter -- a bar with several violations -- the owner was prepared and met him at the door. News travels fast when an inspection is underway.
4. Code Enforcement inspections of bars that serve liquor until 2:00 am should be top priority because that's where and when most problems occur. Instead, the officer spends most of his time inspecting the many restaurants that close by 10:30 pm and problem bars have little to worry about.
5. Downtown Encinitas residents are still being awakened by loud, obnoxious, inebriated people yelling in the street throughout downtown but particularly on 2nd and 3rd Streets between D Street and K Street. These intoxicated people then get in their cars and present an additional danger to public safety. To our knowledge, there have been no new deterrents to this unruly behavior.
Here's an excerpt from an email that the ECC received on 12/29/2014:
"There were people yelling loudly outside from 2:30 to 3 am on Friday (actually Saturday morning), 2:45 am to 3:15 am on Saturday (Sunday morning), and at 1:45 am on Sunday (Monday morning!)."
Residents feel afraid knowing that drunken individuals are just outside their door. Because residents often hear screeching of tires and people driving recklessly through their streets, many think it is dangerous to walk or drive in their own neighborhood at night.
The ECC has made the following requests before but we would like to present them again:
1. Have a Code Enforcement Officer regularly patrol downtown Encinitas on weekend nights to control excessively loud noise -- especially near establishments with repeated violations. This would be an essential deterrent to those who are disturbing the peace.
2. Have a vigilant law enforcement presence and give citations to those drunk in public. Let these people know Encinitas has a zero tolerance for this kind of behavior!
3. Have plainclothes officers stationed in and around Highway 101 to see where people are being over served -- or where they are purchasing liquor -- and issue fines.
(It has been suggested that citizens tell the City which bars are over-serving but the Sheriff has said this would not be safe)
4. Conduct frequent, late night, weekend, surprise inspections of the most troublesome bars -- at least until they are in compliance with the law. Not doing so sends citizens the message that these bars are above the law.
5. When someone is caught driving under the influence, find out where this person had the last drink and then issue a citation so this kind of over-serving stops.
For an article on the connection between over-service and DUIs:
Please see link: http://www.10news.com/ news/researcher-has-plan-to- cut-duis-in-san-diego-county (Researcher has Plan to Cut DUIs in San Diego County)
Here's a "sobering" look at the Sheriff's sweep for public drunkeness along the 101. It shows rather unflattering scenes from Encinitas, mostly in front of Shelter.
The Deemed Approved Ordinance was put on hold because City Council felt Encinitas had sufficient codes on its books. Council also hoped that the newly formed PACE program could enforce the law and improve relations between late-night bars and residents. Unfortunately the codes are still not being enforced and relations have not improved between late night bar owners and residents seeking solace.
At the October 15, 2014 City Council meeting, several Council members were clearly frustrated that Shelter and Union repeatedly violated the law in spite of warnings. City Council members instructed Code Enforcement to issue citations and give fines. As far as we know only one establishment has received a fine and they continue to violate code. With no late night inspections since Thanksgiving, one can only wonder how many violations are occurring.
In conclusion: The excessive noise problem still exists downtown as does the threat to public safety due to late night drinking. These violations will likely continue until you take the above steps, such as conducting surprise late night inspections downtown on weekend nights, especially of problem establishments -- and issue meaningful fines that truly act as deterrents.
Please make 2015 the year you take action to keep Encinitas peaceful and safe and a good place in which to live and thrive!
Had dinner in Del Mar last night, reminded me of how Encinitas was not that long ago. The drunk scene is a nightmare. Vibrancy elsewhere.
ReplyDelete"Had dinner in Del Mar last night, reminded me of how Encinitas was not that long ago." I know what you me. Wish we could turn back the clock to when Encinitas was expensive, congested and pompous.
Delete7:58 is itching for a fight. Don't take the bait.
DeleteGuys a bully.
DeleteWalked downtown - a drunk guy was screaming at his girlfriend in front of the Saloon. Passed by quickly, didn't make eye contact. On the return walk, they were now around the corner, but the girl was howling at the guy. Again - kept on moving, as "domestic violence" has a tendency to 'spread'. Alcohol is a drug of the emotions and often they aren't very attractive....
ReplyDeleteI'm too old to be out late drinking, save for rare events, but I like living in a place with life after dark. I posted a first hand account of noise and over serving here a few months ago.
ReplyDeleteI have no problem with the suggestions in this letter, except for #5. It's difficult for a busy barkeep to spot a .08 BAC with any accuracy. Besides, some people who go above .08 are well behaved, and take a cab. Even someone who is sluring and stumbling may have done shots at one place, and had one last drink somewhere else before the shots fully took effect. In that case, they may have seemed fine to the bartender at the last stop.
In any case, we should endorse the laws more strictly. Neighbors downtown deserve some peace, and patrons can have a fine time without being a public nuisance or worse.
I have been out on weekend nights, generally calling it a night at 11 PM, and I have not seen anything too bad. However, I'm sure there are problems. What I don't get is why the Sheriff's department is not proactive, and not following item #1 in the posted list: "Have a Code Enforcement Officer regularly patrol downtown Encinitas on weekend nights to control excessively loud noise -- especially near establishments with repeated violations. This would be an essential deterrent to those who are disturbing the peace." Since the is the most problematic place in Encinitas, shouldn't they petrol there until called elsewhere?? Where are the officers patrolling??
ReplyDeleteSounds like there are some "agreements" here. Things are corrected just prior to a visit? - hummmm - free drinks ? Maybe more?
DeleteIf this City Council sits back and does nothing about this horrible situation, then they all should be recalled. I am certain none of the council would want this going on in their neighborhood. I do realize that these establishments produce big bucks for the city, but something must be done before a tragedy takes place.
ReplyDeleteThe people who live downtown should not be subjected to this kind of nightly abuse where they can not get a decent night's sleep. These people should band together and sue the city if nothing is done to stop this. Perhaps that is the only way the council will pay attention.
Enough is enough. This needs to go back before the council for serious discussion and decision making.
I don't like the label Encinitas is getting from all of these obnoxious drunks. They are being brought here by the bus loads. It has to stop NOW.
Wake up council.
Get busy next election and open your wallet. Your deteriorating quality of life and property values depend on it.
DeleteThis Council is part of the problem not the cure.
Where do the council members live? Far from downtown is my guess, so it's not their problem is it? If it was on their doorstep there would be action, and rest assured their streets are nicely paved.
ReplyDeleteYeah, if Hygeia is nicely paved.
DeleteWalking home drunk you notice how it is paved?
DeleteLet's rent one of those party buses and at 3 AM drive by each council's home and make the biggest noise possible. That should get their attention quickly.
Deletesounds good… by 3am they might be home from their free drinks at the union.
DeleteAgreed see below.
DeleteDrive up and down their streets all day with modified mufflers and revving engines and squeaky breaks. They could care less about the vehicle noise violations on my residential street. What is with the influx of debauchery, noise, and overdevelopment in Encinitas? Why are people allowed to drive all over this city with vehicles as loud as they want?
DeleteThis Council will do nothing for downtown residents…. they like the income from bars to pay Muir's big pension. If you want relief you will elect a downtown resident to Council. I will vote for that person.
ReplyDeleteLeucadia tried to but Kranz turned out to be a Dalakranz and is making problems worse not better. He will be dumped next election.
Save Encinitas - Dump Kranz.
ReplyDeleteKranz probably sits on a complimentary Shelter bar stool during the Council meetings - feels like home.
DeleteBeing drunk in public is an arrest, not a ticket. Every time someone is arrested it takes a deputy off the beat because now that person has to be taken to the jail. Now that's one less Deputy. They have to pick and choose who is really intoxicated to the point that they can't care for their own safety or are acting in a manor which is dangerous to others. Most people who are drunk don't rise to that level of intoxication. Yelling and screaming because they are drunk doesn't make them unable to care for their themselves.
ReplyDeleteIt is a complex situation but they do cause a public nuisance. There should be some way to curb these kinds of disturbances to the peace! What is the PACE program doing about this?
DeleteAt one city council meeting I attended in I think October, 2014, the code enforcement people and the fire marshall were there. Council asked the fire marshall about violations. She said that she had gone to two bars that were in violation, but they quickly got into compliance so she saw no need to ticket them. I cannot help but wonder if as soon as she left, they went back to putting more chairs and stools back to keep up with the crowd. This is a complex problem and I wonder if the reason that we are having such difficulty with it is 1) The Union is almost next door to Coast law Group, where Marco and company hang out and 2) the Shelter is where the planning dept, held a public meeting. Does that raise any conflict of interest issues? I really don't know. I do know that these two restaurant/bars are the ones creating a lot of the problems, but I don't know what the connections are. It does seem rather stupid to hold a public workshop at a bar who continually violates codes-that would be the Shelter.
DeleteI know younger people want to have a good time, as I did when I was younger. How can we, as a community, convince these places that they are not helping people by getting them so drunk that they do stupid things? And yes, as a former bartender, I can tell you that most of us are trained to recognize if someone is drunk. We were not supposed to serve them at that point. Whether they met the .08 threshold was irrelevant at the bar I worked at. If they acted drunk, they were bounced. El Cabezon was closed for a time by the ABC for selling to underage people. That is a huge fine. Seems like they could also get invalid. Maybe this letter should also go to them, if it hasn't already.
Park a paddy wagon in the lumber yard, and have intensive foot patrols around closing. Quick to nab drunks, stick them in the van, then go back out on patrol. An hour after closing, take the whole night's harvest to the drunk tank until 10am the next day.
DeleteRepeat this a couple times a month for six months, and word will get around. Be good or be gone.
A paddy wagon? Get real you watch to much television. Unfortunately the democratic legislature has enacted to many laws on how you must treat prisoners. Paddy wagons isn't among them.
DeleteAfter they were cited, Union had barstools out again repeatedly. They received a $100 fine but it was too insignificant to make a difference. Someone saw their barstools out this past Sunday night so chance are they've been out multiple times. Who wouldn't pay a $100 fine when they can earn ten times that amount serving more patrons?
ReplyDeleteWhat's the fixation with bar stools? Who cares if the patrons would rather sit or stand?
DeleteI understand that moving the barstools out can make room for more people than the fire code allows, but that's the violation--the fire code capacity, not the bar stools per se.
If late night patrons want to stand, fine. Move the stools, but don't use that to pack in more people than the building can safely hold.
If there really is a regulation dictating the number and location of stools, then I think we have one too many regulations.
11:22 AM has the right idea - other communities have used this approach successfully. During the street faire, the Sheriff's Department had some major battle wagon parked in the 7-11 parking lot - looked like the wholesale mobile booking center. Time to deploy it in the downtown and use it as incentive to modify drunken behavior. Odds are you won't ever see this, as it'd be "bad" for business. If anyone is injured or killed by a drunk, watch the city get sued for lack of timely action to curb an obvious nuisance.
ReplyDeleteOnly when a tragedy and/or lawsuit occurs will the Council decide there is a problem. Right now, they ARE the problem by not enforcing a law which is on the books -- every resident is entitled to the peace and quiet enjoyment of their home. This has not been happening and the noise abatement law needs to be strictly enforced. Otherwise, this law is nothing but a sham.
ReplyDeleteBarth still in danger of getting some well-deserved vibrancy on her own front step? Hope so...by the busload.
ReplyDeleteBarth has always voted in favor of curbing late night bar disturbances. It's always Barth and Shaffer vs the other 3. Mayor Gaspar had a fund raiser at Shelter so who knows how bad things will get now?
ReplyDeleteCan't wait to see Barth begging for mercy before the Planning Commission and Council. She's been on the wrong side of far too many appeals to be cut any slack.
DeleteAnd if Barth's protege Blakespear has her way, resident appellants will indeed be forced to beg for mercy with the Council in her closed-session, forced mediation scheme. Read next Wednesday's agenda, folks.
On a positive note, both liquor stores on south 101 have closed in the last few months. One space has a sign up that the new tenant is a yoga clothes store.
ReplyDeleteI love seeing yoga pants as much as the next pervert, but, seriously?
Better than a liquor store.
DeleteAgreed. Bring yoga pants to Leucadia please.
ReplyDelete