Wednesday, December 11, 2019

12/11/19 City Council meeting open thread

Please use the comments to record your observations.

33 comments:

  1. Good job to all the speakers in opposition of Saxony parking lot. Now we are proposing over $50,000 for a traffic study on RSF Rd. because there is too many people are cutting through?? Study will include license plate readers that will reveal the driver's location 30 min. before they drove through??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This has everything to do with the ghetto apartments they want to build as they never seem to care about this before so why now? And so what, now these whackos think they can stop someone from driving down a road? or do they want to make a case for a wider road in order to lessen the congestion on that the ghetto apartments will cause.
      They are up to no good again.

      Delete
    2. Agenda item for next week - Mayor/council voting on a 30 million dollars loan/debt for 101 streetscape. The price to build has increased 10 million dollars since the beginning of this year.
      Recall this crappy Mayor and council now.

      Delete
  2. its simple to know that only 10% of the users of that road live in Encinitas. All the other drivers are just using it to get from Vista, Carlsbad, and San Marcos to San Diego. They don't want to go down la costa to I5 because it take longer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And once they prove this the plan is to "make it difficult" for people to travel on this road.

      Delete
    2. 10%. Your made-up number sounds reasonable.

      Delete
  3. No not to "make it difficult". Currently the street is difficult. They need to make it flow better without all the stops, and work better for pedestrians and all users. I know, lets replace all the stop signs with roundabouts. Roundabouts work great as proven on Santa Fe Drive and Leucadia Blvd.

    That sounds like a $50k idea. Safer, more efficient, better for the environment, quieter, more inviting for all users, quieter and good for property values. Who could ask for more!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm glad to see the residents speak against the Mayor and other lambs trying to sell out Encinitas to those who make a healthy sum of money in the homeless industry.

    Let show our City Council, whose shown they are welcoming all homeless and all the world's poor, criminally insane, and Meth heads to Encinitas, we the people do not agree with this mission.

    Lets show them its not what "we the people" want and lets replace every one of them next election!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. What happened to the big plan Moscow had that was supposed to start last August for the walking area along the east side of Santa Fe Rd? Well Moscow, what happened? It's on the Cities website as a project. And so far, no project.
    This is what happens when people that are elected are clueless in the world of construction, building and development.
    You can have all the degrees on earth but without any sense, common or otherwise, you ain't that smart.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Olivenhain doesn’t want a traffic study because it can only show either that the road is fine and they need to stop being so selfish and take their puny undersized share of the housing burden, or it will show that the road needs to be improved so that they can accept their puny undersized share of the housing burden.

    Both bad outcomes if you want to hide behind road infrastructure as a fog leaf for your selfish view that ALL of the burden should be in someone else’s neighborhood, because horses.

    I call horse shit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sure, go try driving RSF road some morning or evening. after an hour you will learn that all is not fine. The road is what it is and widening it would take a lot of eminent domain dollars and undergrounding power lines putting in storm drains, etc. All it would take is about a hundred million bucks.

      Delete
    2. Shocker. You think the road is unfixable?

      So your solution must be either (a.) propose an alternate location in Olivenhain with better road infrastructure or (b.) moving those units of high density housing into someone else’s neighborhood.

      Which is it?

      We’ll wait.

      Delete
    3. Hi Marco. Bullied anyone out in the line up lately?

      Delete
    4. Not Marco. Weak ass distraction.

      Why don’t you want to answer the simple question at 11:33?

      Delete
    5. 8:13 and 11:33... same shill for the developer that wants to poison Olivenhain

      Delete
    6. 11:54 thinks Olivenhain should have zero density housing, and your neighborhood should have all of it.

      Ask him or her what percentage of the density housing would be a fair share for Olivenhain.

      You won’t get an answer, because it’s too obviously selfish to say “zero” out loud.

      Delete
    7. FTR, I never most anonymously. - Marco

      Delete
    8. 8:37 is the same shill for the developer.

      Delete
  7. I wonder if the city is every going to start addressing the Oak Crest gang, Blano Nightmare.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

      Delete
    2. My friend’s cousin said their cat went missing. A few days later they found some fur in the canyon. They suspect it was a ritualistic sacrifice performed by Blanco Nightmare.

      Delete
  8. Another traffic study? They have every round about, traffic and planning consultant in the state on speed dial at the City. We spend millions of dollars of taxpayers' money on consultants while paying for completely staffed City departments and funding employee retirement funds. It is no wonder that Encinitas is in worse financial shape than neighboring cities.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The pension deficit was once estimated to be around $50 million - that figure is going to grow.

      Delete
    2. The problem is the city council is always looking to change things instead of maintaining what is existance. Pie in the sky nonsense. They just fiddle away money on dumb ideas.

      Delete
    3. Everything should have stopped changing right after my house was built.

      Delete
    4. thanks tony. and it's not your house.

      Delete
  9. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    ReplyDelete
  10. they can not even get rid of goat heads along the RR tracks which completely shuts down kids and patrons from riding bikes or anything with tubes along that road.

    Several City Council members said they would correct the problem, yet no change or it might even be worse.

    And you really think they have the ability to address larger issues?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So the city should spend thousands because you won’t spend an extra five bucks for a thorn-proof tube?

      Delete
    2. Kids are riding bikes next to the rail road tracks??
      That seems safe.
      I think bike people are as crazy as the man made global warming people, or, are they one in the same. Hmmmm...

      Delete
  11. Dave at Leucadia Bicycles made a lot of money off me selling those "thorn proof" liners that go inside the wheels.

    ReplyDelete