During the coronavirus lockdown, the City Council has reportedly been meeting while allowing the public only prior submission of written comments, not the ability to speak and be questioned by the council on agenda items.
This, according to First Amendment Coalition executive director
David Snyder, is illegal.
From the Inbox:
Thanks for your email. In responding to inquiries like yours, we can give general information regarding open government and speech issues but cannot provide specific legal advice or representation.
None of the governor's executive orders has waived the requirement that legislative bodies subject to the Brown Act must provide a means by which the public can "directly address the legislative body on any item of interest to the public." Gov. Code section 54954.3. This means addressing the body live and in person. Although "in person" is not possible now, legislative bodies still must provide a way, to the extent possible, for members of the public to address the body during the meeting. Allowing the submission of written comments only beforehand is not sufficient to meet the Brown Act's requirements.
David Snyder
It's technologically trivial to allow public speakers to Zoom or phone in. Why is the City Council locking the public out of participation in the public process?