Wednesday, April 25, 2012

New USC study refutes SANDAG growth forecast

In March, Denise Martin pointed out that the SANDAG population growth forecast being used to justify high density development in Encinitas was using outdated, faulty estimates.
The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) is responsible for forecasting regional population growth, which Encinitas and other local governments use to decide how much new construction should be allowed in their towns. The Encinitas city planners, based on the SANDAG forecast, predicted that Encinitas’ population would increase 15.2 percent between 2010 and 2020. This number — 15.2 percent — was used as the justification in the General Plan Update to allow up-zoning that could result in the construction of 1,255 new apartments on El Camino Real, 847 on the Encinitas Blvd/Interstate 5, and another 280 apartments at the Santa Fe/I-5 Interchange.
A new report from USC shows growth slowing dramatically across California.
The study projects that the state's population, now 37.3 million, will continue to increase at a healthy clip — about 1% annually — for years to come. But at least through 2050, we are unlikely to see the boom rates of recent decades, especially the 1980s.

[...]

"Those of us who've been here for a while think of California as a place that's grow, grow, grow — and go, go, go — but this shows that we're not that anymore," Hans Johnson, a demographer with the Public Policy Institute of California, said of the USC study released Tuesday. "We're now more typical of the rest of the nation."

Presumably, built-out, expensive coastal cities like Encinitas should grow even more slowly than the statewide average as there is plenty of cheap, open space to build on inland.

It's time for the people of Encinitas to tell SANDAG and the city planners where to stuff it.

7 comments:

  1. Do not re-elect any incumbents!! Not city, state or federal. Send them home to collect their giant pensions (ask Mr. Muir if he doesn't like sleeping late and getting paid to do nothing..well it's doubtful he'd know any different from the past 20 years anyway.)

    Throw da bums out, and bring in new bums!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Obviously, the builders have a solution looking for a problem. They want to crowd as many new homes into our area--regardless of whether there is a need or not since they are able to access governement funds and make deals with the Encinitas Planning Department to help them steal other peoples' land and pay for their projects using other peoples' money. In exchange, Stocks gets campaign contributions. It is sick.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So, how do we tell SANDAG to redo it's numbers? Shouldn't the GP redo be put on hold until this is done?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know. We could ask the chairman of SANDAG, some guy named Jerome Stocks...

      Delete
  4. Jerome Stocks gets over 70% of his campaign contributions from out of town developers. Go to city hall and look at his 460 forms. It's all there.

    ReplyDelete
  5. When SANDAG gave its report at the recent Council Meeting, it seemed as though they were saying that the numbers come from the cities? So the cities give SANDAG the numbers? I thought it was confusing, but the SANDAG rep said that they had to be consistent. So BE CONSISTENT and use the Census growth numbers, NOT the "reflective" statistics that are just numbers "massaged" in order to mandate the highest level of development!

    ReplyDelete
  6. What happened to the wild Parrots of Leucadia?? Haven't seen them in years.

    ReplyDelete