It'll fly after the November 2022 elections. Blakespear urged Goodson to have patience, as she tries to ascend the political ladder. Meanwhile, she'll have her hand out for the bribe; aka "campaign donation"...
Joe Mosca blocked me on Instagram about 20min ago because I pointed out that he showed us his true side when he made fun of one of the speakers a week or so ago during the Short Term Rental ordinance meeting. That guy can't handle criticism. It's why he'll never be a true leader.
So there are two items of significant exposure to lawsuits from last week and this week? How many active lawsuits do we have on top of these two new ones?
Stein spoke as if his toes had been stepped on. His whole presentation sounded defensive. At the same time, by repeatedly using the word "alarming," it sounded as if the fire danger and clogged evacuation are alarming. He meant that the consultant's conclusions were erroneous and alarming.
AnonymousOctober 15, 2021 at 11:58 AM Blakespear needs the developers' donations (pay-offs) for her run to the State Senate. In her ambitional wake, Encinitas will be over-developed, traffic-clogged and will have permanently lost the ambiance of a small town community. Some call this inevitable progress; I call it profiteering rationalization.
Reply
AnonymousOctober 18, 2021 at 12:43 PM It does NOT get better than this week's EG:
Blakespear Looks Forward to Goodson Groundbreaking
Hacked communication:
Randy, I know you’ve been into building your colossal apartment house for a long time and have put a lot of money into it, but I have to urge you to accept that now is just not the right time for us to approve it. The opposition group is very strong and really have their ducks in a row. There’s unusually high awareness in the larger community simply because of the enormous size of your project. Add to that its awkward location and the many problems it poses. I mean, gee whiz, you can’t ignore putting thousands of people’s lives in danger!
But the overriding problem is the timing. Two other council members and I have elections coming up. What do you think the chances are of any of us winning if we vote to approve a project — that’s your project, Randy — that’s a blatant, opportunistic manipulation of state laws and local ordinances and, consequently, is on very shaky legal grounds?
Plus, the optics aren’t good. The massive building doesn’t fit its location physically or conceptually as part of the community. On top of that, while claiming to benefit low income people, you’ve shoehorned those tiny units into the worst locations in the building. And, Randy, even I have to say that your claim of doing Olivenhain and Encinitas a favor by plopping your colossus on the corner of Rancho Santa Fe Road and Encinitas Boulevard is transparently silly and offensive. And by the way, you don’t own half the width of Rancho Santa Fe Road. That claim is absurd.
Randy, you know I supported SB9 and SB10, and I opposed and tried to kill Prop A — including suing my constituents. I pushed Measures T and U through when I knew they were unpopular and wouldn’t pass. I force-fed approval of the Housing Element. I support and continue to torture residents with things like the Cycle Trap, Leucadia Streetscape and that huge, oddly named imposition on the north Leucadia bluffs. I’ve betrayed residents in virtually every way possible — even worse than Barth, Shaffer, Kranz and Mosca. People compare Stocks favorably with me for cripe’s sake!
So all this is to say that for you to expect me to vote for your overwhelming apartment house now is a bridge way too far. I must ask you to back off. I must ask you to delay. The primary for my state Senate election is in June 2022. The general election is that November. If I win the Senate seat, I’ll still have local influence that, combined with my newfound state power, will let me get your project greenlighted. I’ll be able to say I regret its unprecedented height and mass and the evacuation dangers it poses, but that it does help fulfill our housing mandate, including those tiny affordable units. After you make some sleight-of-hand adjustments, I can say it complies with state laws and local ordinances. I can say my hands are tied, I must abide by the law. I can take advantage of the fact that voters have short memories.
Randy, the council never uses common sense to guide its decisions, so it’s ironic I’m asking you to use yours now. Be patient, you’ll get what you want. I’ll be at your groundbreaking with a gold shovel.
Jesus Tony at 9:16pm quit sucking ass to Blakespear!!!
You sell out Leucadia and you suck ass to Olivenhain. You suck Tony. Leave town! You are a sell out to Leucadia who you are supposed to represent us not sell us out!
How fucking sloppy... It shows the shitty work. Coastal development permit?!!! Did anyone besides dumb ass Tony review this development? If the town idiot catches such a glaring mistake just think of all the mistakes made.
Haaaa- Olivenhain back an ass sucking loser with Mosca. I truly do not like people from Olivenhain. Lets make them join San Marcos. Its much more their style then Encinitas.
Let the lawsuites fly with tax payers paying for loser Olivenhain and ass wipes like kranz willing to sell out Leucadia again!!! Gawd- First Dalablabber, now Kranz.....
Blakespear's arrogant speech at the end about how she knew how much money and time Olivenhain residents had invested was disgusting. She thanked them and claimed she and the council were listening. Had they been listening they would never have been in that position in the first place.
Blakespear, Mosca, Kranz constantly trying to rewrite their history. Pathetic and trumplike.
God Hinze, scripted much? You could not have written even one of the sentences you read in your wildest dreams. You're being raised well by Blakespear.
How about a thank you to the Council for rejecting this piece of shit? You're all so wired to find fault you can't even praise them when they do the right thing.
Randy, I know you’ve been into building your colossal apartment house for a long time and have put a lot of money into it, but I have to urge you to accept that now is just not the right time for us to approve it. The opposition group is very strong and really have their ducks in a row. There’s unusually high awareness in the larger community simply because of the enormous size of your project. Add to that its awkward location and the many problems it poses. I mean, gee whiz, you can’t ignore putting thousands of people’s lives in danger!
But the overriding problem is the timing. Two other council members and I have elections coming up. What do you think the chances are of any of us winning if we vote to approve a project — that’s your project, Randy — that’s a blatant, opportunistic manipulation of state laws and local ordinances and, consequently, is on very shaky legal grounds?
Plus, the optics aren’t good. The massive building doesn’t fit its location physically or conceptually as part of the community. On top of that, while claiming to benefit low income people, you’ve shoehorned those tiny units into the worst locations in the building. And, Randy, even I have to say that your claim of doing Olivenhain and Encinitas a favor by plopping your colossus on the corner of Rancho Santa Fe Road and Encinitas Boulevard is transparently silly and offensive. And by the way, you don’t own half the width of Rancho Santa Fe Road. That claim is absurd.
Randy, you know I supported SB9 and SB10, and I opposed and tried to kill Prop A — including suing my constituents. I pushed Measures T and U through when I knew they were unpopular and wouldn’t pass. I force-fed approval of the Housing Element. I support and continue to torture residents with things like the Cycle Trap, Leucadia Streetscape and that huge, oddly named imposition on the north Leucadia bluffs. I’ve betrayed residents in virtually every way possible — even worse than Barth, Shaffer, Kranz and Mosca. People compare Stocks favorably with me for cripe’s sake!
So all this is to say that for you to expect me to vote for your overwhelming apartment house now is a bridge way too far. I must ask you to back off. I must ask you to delay. The primary for my state Senate election is in June 2022. The general election is that November. If I win the Senate seat, I’ll still have local influence that, combined with my newfound state power, will let me get your project greenlighted. I’ll be able to say I regret its unprecedented height and mass and the evacuation dangers it poses, but that it does help fulfill our housing mandate, including those tiny affordable units. After you make some sleight-of-hand adjustments, I can say it complies with state laws and local ordinances. I can say my hands are tied, I must abide by the law. I can take advantage of the fact that voters have short memories.
Randy, the council never uses common sense to guide its decisions, so it’s ironic I’m asking you to use yours now. Be patient, you’ll get what you want. I’ll be at your groundbreaking with a gold shovel.
A "thank you," 4:35? You can't even see straight you're so busy licking Blakespear's boots. From ERRD's recap:
"It was clear from the lack of substantive deliberation, that Council had reached its decision over multiple sessions closed to the public. It was equally clear that Staff was charged with providing political cover for Council by bickering over details of the community-funded Weber fire safety report rather than critically evaluating the project's impact on wildfire evacuation. We must demand better from our City leaders.
In denying our appeal, the City approved Goodson’s consolidation of multiple lots for a single site, paving the way for the next Goodson project."
I live a stones throw from the proposed goodson apartment insanity. Note to goodson...if you think we are done with you, think again. Spend more money, go on, spend it and see the outcome. A smart person would simply build a few luxury homes on that land, make a few bucks and call it good. A stupid person who owns the land, goes up against people wo live in that area who take their kidlets to those local schools, day care etc who will fight you "for ever". Why??? Because they can. No matter how smart you "think you are", there will always be smarter than you...always. So keep it up, lose more money trying to ruin this area. And, as for the zoning, the City should reverse that bad decision and do the right thing, not the wrong thing.
BIAspear selected the property for the massive upzone. and the State/commi Newson upzoned it further by state law.
Goodson has the right and will develop the property to the max and if you do not like it thank BIAspear and Kranz. Goodson is just playing the game by the rules and we need more affordable housing for all your new freindly neighbors. Ba Haa ha ha.
You voted for BIA, now choke on the development dust, traffic gridlock and crowded LA style beach. Peace out loser.
Right on 4:43 am ! wakin' up clear minded and putting the reality out there... Goonson is a thug. Is he some kinda of narco guy? Consider his morphing$ project, he appears to be slithering for a payday at Encinitas' expense. And after the $11 M give-away to the night-rider, this city is pegged as wealthy and incompetent. a bad combination for us home-owner, tax-payers. ...
We'll see 11:07. The clown goodson has no rights to build whatever he wants. It's our job to stop him. The classless act of goodson "may have a watch, but we time" Tic Toc goodson and your girlfriend 11:07...
Oops, forgive me. They have a concept they are certain of. Certainly wrong on every aspect.
Those who have been given wealth/resources without working a lifetime for it tend to have really bad ideas and oftentimes attempt to ram those failed ideas up our cabooses.
Does anyone else find it comical that this blog will leave comments like "Let's Go Brandon", aka Fuck Joe Biden, but deletes the well drawn dicks? What a bunch of snowflakes. Get triggered much little guys?
11:09 - you want to 7:42 to start a dick blog, because you love dicks? You think about them all the time, don't you? When you are falling asleep, the last thing you think about are the veins pulsing on a thick cock.
The council has a vision for the future, all right. It's $$$$$ in campaign donations above the table, who knows where else?
Now Alila Marea big Blakespear donor and host of her Propaganda of the City event is going back to the council trough with a "sister project." Any Leucadian who voted for Kranz qualifies for a free straitjacket. Step right up.
Hey Lorena G is this you? Rich take coming from someone who claims she was a struggling single mom but lived in a $1M home a block off Mission Bay paid for by her MLB-playing baby daddy, rec'd $8k/mo in child support, then moved to the only bougie area in 2nd poorest district in CA just to run for office.
The only bigger fraud is he/him/garbage fraudster Nathan
Good god these people need to be run over by busses. Preferably shortbusses.
12:03 - can you please drop the code-speak or whatever less-than-English thing that you're posting? oh, and by the way - it is buses.. https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/plural-of-bus#:~:text=The%20plural%20of%20the%20noun,an%20error%20to%20many%20people. That written, have a good evening you publically defaming knob-gobbler.
Any predictions re Goodson?
ReplyDeleteIt'll fly after the November 2022 elections. Blakespear urged Goodson to have patience, as she tries to ascend the political ladder. Meanwhile, she'll have her hand out for the bribe; aka "campaign donation"...
DeleteJoe Mosca blocked me on Instagram about 20min ago because I pointed out that he showed us his true side when he made fun of one of the speakers a week or so ago during the Short Term Rental ordinance meeting. That guy can't handle criticism. It's why he'll never be a true leader.
ReplyDeleteMosca the carpetbagger from Sierra Madre...
DeleteThey have a special presentation thinking that the audience will be impressed. What a waste of time.
ReplyDeleteSo there are two items of significant exposure to lawsuits from last week and this week? How many active lawsuits do we have on top of these two new ones?
ReplyDeleteStein spoke as if his toes had been stepped on. His whole presentation sounded defensive. At the same time, by repeatedly using the word "alarming," it sounded as if the fire danger and clogged evacuation are alarming. He meant that the consultant's conclusions were erroneous and alarming.
ReplyDeleteGeorge H from Cardiff is back!! I love that guy!
ReplyDeleteI love the passion of the people!
ReplyDeletetotally predicted by many including EG
ReplyDeleteAnonymousOctober 15, 2021 at 11:58 AM
Blakespear needs the developers' donations (pay-offs) for her run to the State Senate. In her ambitional wake, Encinitas will be over-developed, traffic-clogged and will have permanently lost the ambiance of a small town community. Some call this inevitable progress; I call it profiteering rationalization.
Reply
AnonymousOctober 18, 2021 at 12:43 PM
It does NOT get better than this week's EG:
Blakespear Looks Forward to Goodson Groundbreaking
Hacked communication:
Randy, I know you’ve been into building your colossal apartment house for a long time and have put a lot of money into it, but I have to urge you to accept that now is just not the right time for us to approve it. The opposition group is very strong and really have their ducks in a row. There’s unusually high awareness in the larger community simply because of the enormous size of your project. Add to that its awkward location and the many problems it poses. I mean, gee whiz, you can’t ignore putting thousands of people’s lives in danger!
But the overriding problem is the timing. Two other council members and I have elections coming up. What do you think the chances are of any of us winning if we vote to approve a project — that’s your project, Randy — that’s a blatant, opportunistic manipulation of state laws and local ordinances and, consequently, is on very shaky legal grounds?
Plus, the optics aren’t good. The massive building doesn’t fit its location physically or conceptually as part of the community. On top of that, while claiming to benefit low income people, you’ve shoehorned those tiny units into the worst locations in the building. And, Randy, even I have to say that your claim of doing Olivenhain and Encinitas a favor by plopping your colossus on the corner of Rancho Santa Fe Road and Encinitas Boulevard is transparently silly and offensive. And by the way, you don’t own half the width of Rancho Santa Fe Road. That claim is absurd.
Randy, you know I supported SB9 and SB10, and I opposed and tried to kill Prop A — including suing my constituents. I pushed Measures T and U through when I knew they were unpopular and wouldn’t pass. I force-fed approval of the Housing Element. I support and continue to torture residents with things like the Cycle Trap, Leucadia Streetscape and that huge, oddly named imposition on the north Leucadia bluffs. I’ve betrayed residents in virtually every way possible — even worse than Barth, Shaffer, Kranz and Mosca. People compare Stocks favorably with me for cripe’s sake!
So all this is to say that for you to expect me to vote for your overwhelming apartment house now is a bridge way too far. I must ask you to back off. I must ask you to delay. The primary for my state Senate election is in June 2022. The general election is that November. If I win the Senate seat, I’ll still have local influence that, combined with my newfound state power, will let me get your project greenlighted. I’ll be able to say I regret its unprecedented height and mass and the evacuation dangers it poses, but that it does help fulfill our housing mandate, including those tiny affordable units. After you make some sleight-of-hand adjustments, I can say it complies with state laws and local ordinances. I can say my hands are tied, I must abide by the law. I can take advantage of the fact that voters have short memories.
Randy, the council never uses common sense to guide its decisions, so it’s ironic I’m asking you to use yours now. Be patient, you’ll get what you want. I’ll be at your groundbreaking with a gold shovel.
Let's go Brandon
DeleteJesus Tony at 9:16pm quit sucking ass to Blakespear!!!
ReplyDeleteYou sell out Leucadia and you suck ass to Olivenhain. You suck Tony. Leave town! You are a sell out to Leucadia who you are supposed to represent us not sell us out!
How fucking sloppy... It shows the shitty work. Coastal development permit?!!! Did anyone besides dumb ass Tony review this development? If the town idiot catches such a glaring mistake just think of all the mistakes made.
ReplyDeleteHaaaa- Olivenhain back an ass sucking loser with Mosca. I truly do not like people from Olivenhain. Lets make them join San Marcos. Its much more their style then Encinitas.
ReplyDeleteLet the lawsuites fly with tax payers paying for loser Olivenhain and ass wipes like kranz willing to sell out Leucadia again!!! Gawd- First Dalablabber, now Kranz.....
ReplyDeleteBlah, blah, blah. Just vote!
ReplyDelete64 comments in survey for mobity the biggest city topic. What a joke,
ReplyDeletePeople know BIAspear doesn't listen to residents so why waste your life time.
We are not like these tools on City Council who waste there life sucking ass to BIAspear.
OMG- Lyndes doesn't know. BIAspear supports gridlocking traffic and making everyone ride busses and trains to slowwhere.
ReplyDeleteShould be titled:
ReplyDeleteEncinitas City Council Gaslighting Meeting
Blakespear's arrogant speech at the end about how she knew how much money and time Olivenhain residents had invested was disgusting. She thanked them and claimed she and the council were listening. Had they been listening they would never have been in that position in the first place.
ReplyDeleteBlakespear, Mosca, Kranz constantly trying to rewrite their history. Pathetic and trumplike.
God Hinze, scripted much? You could not have written even one of the sentences you read in your wildest dreams. You're being raised well by Blakespear.
ReplyDeleteHow about a thank you to the Council for rejecting this piece of shit? You're all so wired to find fault you can't even praise them when they do the right thing.
ReplyDeleteFind fault?
DeleteAre you part of the gaslight brigade?
Are you ignoring everything the woketopian city council stands for?
The fight against these garbage humans must never stop. Ever. They've cheapened every single word in the english dictionary.
They hire woketopian fools that have never lived or worked in the city to do their dirtywork.
The tide is changing.
Hang em high and release the deck NOW
The tide is changing? Wasn't that the theme of the last election?
Delete4:35pm- This is all part of the plan.
ReplyDeleteHacked communication:
Randy, I know you’ve been into building your colossal apartment house for a long time and have put a lot of money into it, but I have to urge you to accept that now is just not the right time for us to approve it. The opposition group is very strong and really have their ducks in a row. There’s unusually high awareness in the larger community simply because of the enormous size of your project. Add to that its awkward location and the many problems it poses. I mean, gee whiz, you can’t ignore putting thousands of people’s lives in danger!
But the overriding problem is the timing. Two other council members and I have elections coming up. What do you think the chances are of any of us winning if we vote to approve a project — that’s your project, Randy — that’s a blatant, opportunistic manipulation of state laws and local ordinances and, consequently, is on very shaky legal grounds?
Plus, the optics aren’t good. The massive building doesn’t fit its location physically or conceptually as part of the community. On top of that, while claiming to benefit low income people, you’ve shoehorned those tiny units into the worst locations in the building. And, Randy, even I have to say that your claim of doing Olivenhain and Encinitas a favor by plopping your colossus on the corner of Rancho Santa Fe Road and Encinitas Boulevard is transparently silly and offensive. And by the way, you don’t own half the width of Rancho Santa Fe Road. That claim is absurd.
Randy, you know I supported SB9 and SB10, and I opposed and tried to kill Prop A — including suing my constituents. I pushed Measures T and U through when I knew they were unpopular and wouldn’t pass. I force-fed approval of the Housing Element. I support and continue to torture residents with things like the Cycle Trap, Leucadia Streetscape and that huge, oddly named imposition on the north Leucadia bluffs. I’ve betrayed residents in virtually every way possible — even worse than Barth, Shaffer, Kranz and Mosca. People compare Stocks favorably with me for cripe’s sake!
So all this is to say that for you to expect me to vote for your overwhelming apartment house now is a bridge way too far. I must ask you to back off. I must ask you to delay. The primary for my state Senate election is in June 2022. The general election is that November. If I win the Senate seat, I’ll still have local influence that, combined with my newfound state power, will let me get your project greenlighted. I’ll be able to say I regret its unprecedented height and mass and the evacuation dangers it poses, but that it does help fulfill our housing mandate, including those tiny affordable units. After you make some sleight-of-hand adjustments, I can say it complies with state laws and local ordinances. I can say my hands are tied, I must abide by the law. I can take advantage of the fact that voters have short memories.
Randy, the council never uses common sense to guide its decisions, so it’s ironic I’m asking you to use yours now. Be patient, you’ll get what you want. I’ll be at your groundbreaking with a gold shovel.
A "thank you," 4:35? You can't even see straight you're so busy licking Blakespear's boots. From ERRD's recap:
ReplyDelete"It was clear from the lack of substantive deliberation, that Council had reached its decision over multiple sessions closed to the public. It was equally clear that Staff was charged with providing political cover for Council by bickering over details of the community-funded Weber fire safety report rather than critically evaluating the project's impact on wildfire evacuation. We must demand better from our City leaders.
In denying our appeal, the City approved Goodson’s consolidation of multiple lots for a single site, paving the way for the next Goodson project."
This was no victory for residents.
I live a stones throw from the proposed goodson apartment insanity. Note to goodson...if you think we are done with you, think again. Spend more money, go on, spend it and see the outcome.
ReplyDeleteA smart person would simply build a few luxury homes on that land, make a few bucks and call it good. A stupid person who owns the land, goes up against people wo live in that area who take their kidlets to those local schools, day care etc who will fight you "for ever". Why??? Because they can.
No matter how smart you "think you are", there will always be smarter than you...always. So keep it up, lose more money trying to ruin this area. And, as for the zoning, the City should reverse that bad decision and do the right thing, not the wrong thing.
BIAspear selected the property for the massive upzone. and the State/commi Newson upzoned it further by state law.
DeleteGoodson has the right and will develop the property to the max and if you do not like it thank BIAspear and Kranz. Goodson is just playing the game by the rules and we need more affordable housing for all your new freindly neighbors. Ba Haa ha ha.
You voted for BIA, now choke on the development dust, traffic gridlock and crowded LA style beach. Peace out loser.
Right on 4:43 am ! wakin' up clear minded and putting the reality out there... Goonson is a thug. Is he some kinda of narco guy? Consider his morphing$ project, he appears to be slithering for a payday at Encinitas' expense. And after the $11 M give-away to the night-rider, this city is pegged as wealthy and incompetent. a bad combination for us home-owner, tax-payers. ...
DeleteI appears 11:07 doesn't live in Encinitas. What a shock
DeleteWe'll see 11:07. The clown goodson has no rights to build whatever he wants. It's our job to stop him.
DeleteThe classless act of goodson "may have a watch, but we time"
Tic Toc goodson and your girlfriend 11:07...
Reasonable thinker up early^^
ReplyDeleteThey have no concept of the future.
Oops, forgive me. They have a concept they are certain of.
Certainly wrong on every aspect.
Those who have been given wealth/resources without working a lifetime for it tend to have really bad ideas and oftentimes attempt to ram those failed ideas up our cabooses.
Be a fighter not a follower.
:blowskisses:
Does anyone else find it comical that this blog will leave comments like "Let's Go Brandon", aka Fuck Joe Biden, but deletes the well drawn dicks? What a bunch of snowflakes. Get triggered much little guys?
ReplyDeleteYeah. Get your own blog for your dick fetish.
Delete11:09 - you want to 7:42 to start a dick blog, because you love dicks? You think about them all the time, don't you? When you are falling asleep, the last thing you think about are the veins pulsing on a thick cock.
DeleteThe council has a vision for the future, all right. It's $$$$$ in campaign donations above the table, who knows where else?
ReplyDeleteNow Alila Marea big Blakespear donor and host of her Propaganda of the City event is going back to the council trough with a "sister project." Any Leucadian who voted for Kranz qualifies for a free straitjacket. Step right up.
Agreed. Kranz the worst for Leucadia and the worst for Encinitas. Complete sell out.
ReplyDelete12 years sitting up there and what does he have to show for it? Aside from his flip against our housing voting rights and a spiffier wardrobe?
DeleteThere all FRAUDS.
ReplyDeleteEvery single one of them.
Hey Lorena G is this you?
Rich take coming from someone who claims she was a struggling single mom but lived in a $1M home a block off Mission Bay paid for by her MLB-playing baby daddy, rec'd $8k/mo in child support, then moved to the only bougie area in 2nd poorest district in CA just to run for office.
The only bigger fraud is he/him/garbage fraudster Nathan
Good god these people need to be run over by busses.
Preferably shortbusses.
I see you are calling for violence against your political rivals. How very Trumpian of you.
Delete12:03 - can you please drop the code-speak or whatever less-than-English thing that you're posting?
Deleteoh, and by the way - it is buses..
https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/plural-of-bus#:~:text=The%20plural%20of%20the%20noun,an%20error%20to%20many%20people.
That written, have a good evening you publically defaming knob-gobbler.
Uh, it's publicly.
DeleteSo funny when snarky loser grandma grammar gets called out for her failures. Who's the loser grandma?
DeleteKarma's a bitch (literally)
ReplyDeleteHey 9:37 this you?
ReplyDeleteAnd you....and you...and you...
https://mobile.twitter.com/defiantls