“Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
These are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020.
Friday, April 7, 2023
9th Circuit rips Lorena Gonzalez on anti-Uber law
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Surprise, surprise? Not.
ReplyDeleteQuite a pair she and Nathan made, while it lasted.
Will our own downtown dark night represent her?
Gawd, if only she could take her brother with her as she checks out of public life. Our community's future would be so much better off. Dream on. I will.
First comment is all we need. Nuff said!
DeleteLet’s see 1:30 blackout…. That should give us till about 10:00 AM before his eyelids crack open and he heads for the sink faucet.
DeleteDef of Stan - Repetitive boring Pycho 🐧 beater
Regarding Lorena Gonzalez, the panel of Judges had this to say:
Delete“Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
These are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020.
The Ninth Circuit issued its unanimous decision, stating:
“The plausibility of Plaintiffs’ allegations is strengthened by the piecemeal fashion in which the exemptions were granted, and lends credence to Plaintiffs’ allegations that the exemptions were the result of ‘lobbying’ and ‘backroom dealing’ as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation.”
Everything the "pube on the coke can" guy does, is paid for by soemone else. That's not right!
ReplyDeleteThis is awesome. We got probably three more hours of open logical comment opportunity before groundhogs day starts again. 😊
DeleteLet’s see 1:30 blackout…. That should give us till about 10:00 AM before his eyelids crack open and he heads for the sink faucet.
DeleteDef of Stan - Repetitive boring Pycho 🐧 beater
Regarding Lorena Gonzalez, the panel of Judges had this to say:
Delete“Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
These are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020.
The Ninth Circuit issued its unanimous decision, stating:
“The plausibility of Plaintiffs’ allegations is strengthened by the piecemeal fashion in which the exemptions were granted, and lends credence to Plaintiffs’ allegations that the exemptions were the result of ‘lobbying’ and ‘backroom dealing’ as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation.”
Gonzalez family helped ruin downtown San Diego and put the hurt on North County Beachs. Her brother is just as big of a no integrity loser.
ReplyDeleteThey’re like the joker family ruining Gollum.
*Gotham or Gollum
DeleteBoth work unfortunately. 🧟♂️
Even worse than her “integrity loser” brother, is is the mindless, repetitive little regurgitating varmint like creature at 7:52. Let’s hope that at some point they crawl back into whatever hole in the ground they came from.
ReplyDeleteThe 9th Circuit needs to migrate a little north to Encinitas. Take out this corrupt City Council!
ReplyDeleteJeff sure focuses on the porn angle a lot.
ReplyDeleteHow many times a day do you think he watches it?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteMarco removed his comment, figures!
DeleteJeff Morris is teaming up with Mali Woods-Drake. This gets curiouser and curiouser.
ReplyDeleteStan is going down.
ReplyDeleteKim + Jeff = Keff. Two losers for the price of one.
ReplyDeleteRegarding Lorena Gonzalez, the panel of Judges had this to say:
Delete“Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
These are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020.
The Ninth Circuit issued its unanimous decision, stating:
“The plausibility of Plaintiffs’ allegations is strengthened by the piecemeal fashion in which the exemptions were granted, and lends credence to Plaintiffs’ allegations that the exemptions were the result of ‘lobbying’ and ‘backroom dealing’ as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation.”
Jeff and Julie are in inseverable pair. They are one and the same. A unified ticket.
ReplyDeleteAccept them both, or reject them both.
They are one thing.
Jeff + Julie = Jelie
The angry nutcases out of step with Encinitas voters.
Jelie.
Stan is out there. Beware Encinitas.
ReplyDeleteKim isn’t yer shift over yet?
ReplyDeleteGod Stan you are a sick person. Get help.
ReplyDeleteSo the topic is Lorena Gonzalez, yet someone’s trying so desperately hard to change that conversation into Jeff. Why? Looks like the same people attacking Stan are deliberately trying to avoid the topic of Lorena, Nathan and Marco.
ReplyDeleteI guess that means that that Susan, Cindy, Vivian Vail, Mali Drake, Amanda, Natalie are all trying to make a Lorena Gonzalez conversation about Stan.
You’re trying to make it about Marco?
DeleteHe’s not mentioned in the editorial, and had nothing to do with the legislation.
10:07 sticking for Marco are you?
DeleteMarco bullied anyone who spoke out against his sisters corrupt bill.
He defended the bill vigorously! Don’t tell me he didn’t know it was full of corruption, lies and fraud. Why do you think Marco’s gone into hiding?
Morris hasn’t worked in 15 years. He’s as unemployable as he is unelectable, which means Mrs. mayor would be calling the shots. We’d get 2 Morris mouths for one; otherwise known as a Keff.
ReplyDeleteHi Mali!
DeleteAsk the surfers back when Morris’ kid was small. Almost called child protective services on him for throwing the boy into big waves and screaming at him to “teach” him to surf. Ask anyone who’s been around Morris is a known issue.
ReplyDeleteThe 9th Circuit Court basically called Lorena Gonzalez corrupt! They told her she lied about the bill and set it up to further her career with the CA Labor Union! What a piece of shit! By the way Blakespear and Lorena are best buddies. Figures!
ReplyDeleteUnbelievable super freak. I feel so sorry for your kids.
ReplyDeleteStan – go get some help before it’s too late
In trying to defend Gonzalez’s poorly drafted law during oral arguments on July 13, 2022, the state’s deputy attorney general withered under questioning from the three-judge panel. It was notable, the court wrote, that counsel for the state was “unable to articulate a conceivable rationale for AB 5 that explains the exemptions made by AB 5, as amended.”
ReplyDeleteMorris for Misogyny
ReplyDeleteFrom the article- Because of Gonzalez’s blatant “animus not based in reason” directed at the plaintiffs, the Ninth Circuit also concluded that AB 5 plausibly violates the equal protection clause under the 14th Amendment.
ReplyDeleteFrom the article: “The court’s brutal indictment of AB 5 hinged on Gonzalez’s “shocking statements,” tweets, and disparaging remarks against Uber, et al. One such statement (cited in the plaintiff’s complaint) was when Gonzalez called Uber’s chief legal officer Tony West (aka Kamala Harris’s brother-in-law) “full of shit” on September 18, 2019 — the same day Gov. Gavin Newsom signed AB 5 into law.”
ReplyDeleteFrom the article: “Meanwhile, those of us who have witnessed the ongoing dumpster fire of AB 5 since its inception know that Gonzalez’s animus extended to specific local businesses as well during her crafting of the disastrous AB 5 law, which has put hundreds of thousands of career professionals out of business — from tutors and transcriptionists to performing arts groups, indie filmmakers, and wedding planners.”
ReplyDeleteHere’s what the Judges said about Lorena Gonzalez:
ReplyDelete“The plausibility of Plaintiffs’ allegations is strengthened by the piecemeal fashion in which the exemptions were granted, and lends credence to Plaintiffs’ allegations that the exemptions were the result of ‘lobbying’ and ‘backroom dealing’ as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation.”
From the article: ““Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
DeleteThese are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020
It not an “Opinion piece” it’s a “Commentary piece” big difference!
DeleteA commentary is a more in-depth analysis written to draw attention to a work already published. Commentaries are somewhat like “reviews” in that the author presents his or her analysis of a work and why it would be of interest to a specific audience. Usually 2,000-3,000 words.
An opinion piece is a short article that conveys the author’s viewpoint on a research study. It presents a personal review of, for example, the methods and analyses done in the study. Usually 500-1000 words.
Why on earth you’d try to defend the Gonzalez family speaks volumes of your character!
It’s not an article.
ReplyDeleteIt’s clearly marked as an opinion piece.
But the Judges had this to say about Lorena Gonzalez: “The plausibility of Plaintiffs’ allegations is strengthened by the piecemeal fashion in which the exemptions were granted, and lends credence to Plaintiffs’ allegations that the exemptions were the result of ‘lobbying’ and ‘backroom dealing’ as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation.”
DeleteThere can be no doubt, in fact, that Gonzalez displayed specific, targeted animus toward The Coast News when she publicly and falsely accused the family-owned newspaper in 2020 of firing all its employees with the goal of converting them to independent contractors in violation of AB 5.
DeleteThey let the law stand.
DeleteFrom the article:
Delete“In trying to defend Gonzalez’s poorly drafted law during oral arguments on July 13, 2022, the state’s deputy attorney general withered under questioning from the three-judge panel. It was notable, the court wrote, that counsel for the state was “unable to articulate a conceivable rationale for AB 5 that explains the exemptions made by AB 5, as amended.”
It not an “Opinion piece” it’s a “Commentary piece” big difference!
DeleteA commentary is a more in-depth analysis written to draw attention to a work already published. Commentaries are somewhat like “reviews” in that the author presents his or her analysis of a work and why it would be of interest to a specific audience. Usually 2,000-3,000 words.
An opinion piece is a short article that conveys the author’s viewpoint on a research study. It presents a personal review of, for example, the methods and analyses done in the study. Usually 500-1000 words.
Why on earth you’d try to defend the Gonzalez family speaks volumes of your character!
10:28 not true: AB 5 has been repealed.
Delete“So, while many employers and workers know AB 5, the statute it created no longer exists. In other words, many incorrectly claim AB 5 as the basis for the adverse impact on workers and businesses. Again, however, AB 5 was repealed by the enactment of AB 2257.”
10:28
DeleteThe U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari on AB5. As a result, the injunction on AB5 that has been in place for over two years will be lifted, and AB5 will be law in California retroactive to January 1, 2020. AB5 has been repealed.
It’s not marked “opinion” piece jackass, it’s marked “commentary” which is about as in depth as you can get. If you’re gonna be arrogant and correct someone make sure you at least get the facts straight.
DeleteThe judges had this to say about Lorena Gonzalez and her AB 5 Bill.
ReplyDelete“Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
These are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020.
Jeff comes across as a deranged version of the guy with the dog and possibly less informed, if that's possible. He simply will not get the votes but in his mind and that of his followers, he's the messiah. Scary.
ReplyDeleteNothing like the Riverside guy with the dog. That guy was clueless but harmless.
DeleteStan is Stan, and very damaging, especially to his family. Very sad.
Pathetic human
“In trying to defend Gonzalez’s poorly drafted law during oral arguments on July 13, 2022, the state’s deputy attorney general withered under questioning from the three-judge panel. It was notable, the court wrote, that counsel for the state was “unable to articulate a conceivable rationale for AB 5 that explains the exemptions made by AB 5, as amended.”
DeleteRegarding Lorena Gonzalez, the panel of Judges had this to say:
Delete“Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
These are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020.
The Ninth Circuit issued its unanimous decision, stating:
“The plausibility of Plaintiffs’ allegations is strengthened by the piecemeal fashion in which the exemptions were granted, and lends credence to Plaintiffs’ allegations that the exemptions were the result of ‘lobbying’ and ‘backroom dealing’ as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation.”
Stalking and taking photos of homeless isn't slimy? Jeff Morris harassing and posting photos of private citizens only because they support a safe lot isn't slimy?
ReplyDeleteJeff is an asshole for doing that. He is a scary, probably dangerous individual.
DeleteThe Judges had this to say about Lorena Gonzalez:
ReplyDelete“The plausibility of Plaintiffs’ allegations is strengthened by the piecemeal fashion in which the exemptions were granted, and lends credence to Plaintiffs’ allegations that the exemptions were the result of ‘lobbying’ and ‘backroom dealing’ as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation.”
From the article:
ReplyDelete“In trying to defend Gonzalez’s poorly drafted law during oral arguments on July 13, 2022, the state’s deputy attorney general withered under questioning from the three-judge panel. It was notable, the court wrote, that counsel for the state was “unable to articulate a conceivable rationale for AB 5 that explains the exemptions made by AB 5, as amended.”
Lorena Gonzalez is finished:
ReplyDelete“he case has now been sent back to the lower court for reconsideration. In its decision, the 9th Circuit cited Gonzalez no less than 14 times by name. The judges expressed dismay at the arbitrary exemptions bestowed to favored sectors by Gonzalez herself with the help of the bill’s sponsor, the California Labor Federation, which represents 1,200 unions in the state.”
From the article: ““Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
ReplyDeleteThese are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020
His corporation was suspended years ago. Have to wonder what his gainful employment has been since then?
ReplyDeleteC2987019 J MORRIS CAPITAL INC.
Registration Date:
04/24/2007
Jurisdiction:
CALIFORNIA
Entity Type:
DOMESTIC STOCK
Status:
FTB SUSPENDED
Agent for Service of Process:
JEFFREY MORRIS
ENCINITAS CA 92024
Entity Address:
ENCINITAS CA 92024
Entity Mailing Address:
ENCINITAS CA 92024
Regarding Lorena Gonzalez, the panel of Judges had this to say:
Delete“Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
These are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020.
The Ninth Circuit issued its unanimous decision, stating:
“The plausibility of Plaintiffs’ allegations is strengthened by the piecemeal fashion in which the exemptions were granted, and lends credence to Plaintiffs’ allegations that the exemptions were the result of ‘lobbying’ and ‘backroom dealing’ as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation.”
Jeff: "Who's outworked me for the past 3 years? Nobody." HOW DARE YOU. You have no clue as to what others are working on and what's going on behind the scenes. I had seen you as a troubled guy with a good heart but now realize that you're Marco's bully twin.
ReplyDeleteThere's a difference between confidence and ego. Ego as you're displaying is corrosive and you show zero respect shown the work of others. Zero respect.
You're no different than Blakespear and with your posts have moved me from sitting back and watching how this will play out to deciding to work actively against you. Wow.
Regarding Lorena Gonzalez, the panel of Judges had this to say:
ReplyDelete“Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
These are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020.
The Ninth Circuit issued its unanimous decision, stating:
“The plausibility of Plaintiffs’ allegations is strengthened by the piecemeal fashion in which the exemptions were granted, and lends credence to Plaintiffs’ allegations that the exemptions were the result of ‘lobbying’ and ‘backroom dealing’ as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation.”
I encourage you to do your homework. Jeff's bravado may seem attractive when you have had it up to *here* but beyond making a lot of noise he is entirely ignorant on the topics that respondents to his Facebook poll said mattered most to them. Hint: it's not the homeless and it's not corruption.
ReplyDeleteAnd if you brought that ignorance to his attention you instantly were threatened and became one of his targets on social media.
DeleteJeff, how did you become a lunatic?
ReplyDeleteRegarding Lorena Gonzalez, the panel of Judges had this to say:
ReplyDelete“Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
These are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020.
The Ninth Circuit issued its unanimous decision, stating:
“The plausibility of Plaintiffs’ allegations is strengthened by the piecemeal fashion in which the exemptions were granted, and lends credence to Plaintiffs’ allegations that the exemptions were the result of ‘lobbying’ and ‘backroom dealing’ as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation.”
So, while many employers and workers know AB 5, the statute it created no longer exists.
ReplyDeleteIn other words, many incorrectly claim AB 5 as the basis for the adverse impact on workers and businesses. Again, however, AB 5 was repealed by the enactment of AB 2257
Adios AB 5…
ReplyDelete“On June 30, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari on AB5. As a result, the injunction on AB5 that has been in place for over two years will be lifted, and AB5 will be law in California retroactive to January 1, 2020.”
Shame on Julie Thunder and Kristin Gaspar. They used Jeff starting in 2019. They clearly saw he wasn't all there, but he was willing to be loud, so they gladly supported him quietly while distancing themselves publicly. They and Leah Bissonete, Susan Turney, Julie Graboi all pretended they had nothing to do with him, all the while they coached him behind the scenes. Now he's a big problem for them.
ReplyDeleteLook who joined us again, trying to divert attention of Lorena Gonzalez. It’s Mali, Amanda Zelick, Barb Bolton and Joan Dodge. Hi ladies!
Delete11:06 you are wrong about Susan and Julie G coaching Jeff , within weeks of his announcement he was going after them for calling him out. They were never fans However Julie Thunder continued to campaign on his Watchdogs FB page and who can forget Gaspar doing phot ops with Jeff at October Fest.
Delete11:16, AB5 has already been repealed.
Delete“ So, while many employers and workers know AB 5, the statute it created no longer exists. In other words, many incorrectly claim AB 5 as the basis for the adverse impact on workers and businesses. Again, however, AB 5 was repealed by the enactment of AB 2257.”
The court case is regarding if Lorena acted in a manner she unbecoming of her position when writing it. That’s what this is about and the 9th Circuit said she acted out of spite, favoritism and back room deals.
AB5 is gone!
Prove it, bully.
DeleteAB5 is now done and gone!
ReplyDeleteNope.
DeleteRead the ruling.
They sent the case back to the lower court.
1146, I read the ruling from the 9th Circuit Court. You think a lower court will say differently.
DeleteRegarding Lorena Gonzalez, the panel of Judges had this to say:
“Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
These are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020.
The Ninth Circuit issued its unanimous decision, stating:
“The plausibility of Plaintiffs’ allegations is strengthened by the piecemeal fashion in which the exemptions were granted, and lends credence to Plaintiffs’ allegations that the exemptions were the result of ‘lobbying’ and ‘backroom dealing’ as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation.”
11:46 when judges tell Lorena her AB5 Bill was full of holes, back room deals, spite and favoritism, so you really think a lower court will see differently? Nope!
DeleteAnd so is Lorena Gonzalez, next person they’ll go after is Marco Gonzalez.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, Pam Slater Price has posted comments that have been just as negative as Mali's and, in fact, Slater Price has posted some racist comments against Marco in the past that make her look extremely toxic. Just pointing out that while you say people are 'rearing their protective heads on facebook and nextdoor', Bhavani Kirnak, Pam Slater Price, Leah Bissonette, Julie Graboi, Jeff Morris, Garvin Walsh, Steve Houbeck all rear their heads in an even uglier fashion
ReplyDelete11:11 Just love how you Progressive Liberals will defend trawl like Nathan Fletcher, Lorena and Marco Gonzalez. You can’t stand anyone attacking corrupt politicians who’ve committed crimes in your party.
DeleteYou shout out “Me Too” and act as though your champions of women’s rights, then when someone in your party gets caught abusing women and their rights, you defend the abuser. Sick!
11:54 I call bullshit! Let’s see the racist post that Pam has posted about Marco! I think it’s sick that you’re defending Lorena Gonzalez, Marco and Nathan Fletcher only because they’re in your party!
DeleteHypocrites!
I agree 11:11.
Delete11:34, you agree because you’re the person who wrote the comment.
Deletenope
DeleteCalm down Pam Slater, you're just as dirty as Marco, if not worse. The only difference is Marco doesn't pretend to be a good person
Delete12:55 Marco is always telling everyone he’s a good person, who are you fooling.
DeleteLook at how many times he’s told us he was President of the Surfrider Foundation so he can tell us he cares about the environment and our ocean. All while he facilitates putting hotels on the bluffs of North County for developers.
Again. Prove it.
DeleteLook who joined us again, trying to divert attention off Lorena Gonzalez.
ReplyDeleteIt’s Mali Drake, Amanda Zelick, Barb Bolton and Joan Dodge. Hi ladies!
How come you’re not defending the courts ruling on AB5 or standing up for women’s rights, #METOO? Oh that’s right, that doesn’t apply when it involves people you support and voted for.
None of those people are commenting here. Anyone participating in these convos are DUMB.
Delete11:44, I’ve called out a few people on here in the past, Mali and Amanda for example. They defended themselves vigorously, acknowledging that it was them who I was arguing with. Amanda flat out admitted she was on here.
DeleteSo yes these people are on here and they’re also dumb for supporting Fletcher/Gonzalez over the years.
So many fucking idiots on here who think Jeff, Kim, Christie, Rachel, Cindy, Susan are all on here posting about each other.
ReplyDeleteYou don’t realize that it’s Mali, Amanda Zelick, Barb Bolton, Nadine Scott, Joan Dodge, John Gjata that are diverting your attention, creating an internal feud and diverting your attention from the real topics that are being posted.
This is how shitty these people are. Do you see any of the names (Dodge, Bolton, Zelick, Gjata, Nadine) above attacking Fletcher or Gonzalez for what they’ve done recently? No they refuse to acknowledge this and will divert attention away from the topic by attacking Stan, Thunder, Walsh, Cremona, Cindy etc.
Use your head!
I agree they’re trash!
ReplyDeleteEncinitas is doomed. This place is doomed because this town is loaded with too many "keyboard warriors," and not enough "doers."
ReplyDeleteWe need to find out who are "doers" are, and get them all together. The two must be separated, kept away from each other, and let's get 2 more Bruce Ehlers elected!
Garvin for State Assembly
ReplyDeleteLehman brothers Garvin has too much poop on him… 👎🏿💩💩💩💩💩
ReplyDeleteI am convinced Garvin aka Larry Dallas is not good for Encinitas.
ReplyDeleteI think Garvin should run for Mayor. Why? Because nobody else has been able to win for years. At the very least, he would break up the death grip on our City Council. At the very best, he would break up the death grip on our City Council. #Garvinfor2024!
ReplyDeleteGarvin is a douche bag and pushed for everyone to vote for Tony Kranz.
DeleteGarvin would sell his own mother out.
3:40pm- 💯
DeleteWith the recent passing of Lorena and Nathan, Encinitas is the next town in San Diego County that needs to be cleansed.
ReplyDeleteBlakespear should be investigated. She’s no different than Fletcher and Gonzalez, just has a cleaner image. Guarantee we’ll be hearing of her corruption in the future!
DeleteI’m a Democrat, and I respect the court’s ruling, even though it’s not good for LG.
ReplyDeleteNow your turn, MAGAts. Say that you respect the 62 court rulings against the Fat Orange Turd’s election garbage.
Say it, or come out as opposed to our Constitution and courts. Come out as a POS domestic terrorist.
Regarding Lorena Gonzalez, the panel of Judges had this to say:
Delete“Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
These are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020.
The Ninth Circuit issued its unanimous decision, stating:
“The plausibility of Plaintiffs’ allegations is strengthened by the piecemeal fashion in which the exemptions were granted, and lends credence to Plaintiffs’ allegations that the exemptions were the result of ‘lobbying’ and ‘backroom dealing’ as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation.”
12:54 so if anyone speaks out against Nathan Fletcher or Lorena Gonzalez you automatically assume they are MAGA. You couldn’t be further from the truth, and your statement makes you look like a jackass.
Delete#Garvinfor2024!
ReplyDeleteEhlers will run. Garvin por nada.
DeleteThe Potemkin village of Sacramento was allowed to take over San Diego and has about 90% taken over Encinitas with outside influence $$$
ReplyDeleteThere is a 10% chance Encinitas does not become like LA or SF
For the libs that mean 1 in 10 chance you won't get robbed, knifed, or murdered.
Good luck
So long as the Progressive Liberals can hide behind their 10’ gates on Neptune, go to their Lulu Lemon yoga classes and continue to wear there Patagonia puffy jacket uniform and continue to charge their $120,000 Tesla while they shop for $500 in groceries at Lazy Acres, then they’ll be happy.
DeleteBLM is important and so are the immigrants coming from Mexico, just long as they don’t get near the Progressive’s property. Might have to call the Sheriff and report a suspicious brown person walking by your house.
I was a Cindy supporter, voter, and participant in her campaign. I haven't been on here in quite a while, but I am very sad to see what's going on. Cindy had nothing to do with stirring up all of the controversy for Jeff, she was doing her own thing.
ReplyDeleteInitially, we all laughed off Jeff for running, there was no way he had a chance, so we thought. We waited for the first round of donations to come out, and prayed that Jeff would drop out after realizing that he can't raise any money. Unfortunately, this wasn't the case.
Jeff ended up coming out on top of everybody, including Tony. We could also sense him gaining momentum from this, and everybody on our side was in shock. This is when Susan Turney and Pam Slater Price made the call, "take Jeff down at all costs!" They went after Jeff with everything they have, and as I can see on the past few threads, they haven't stopped.
Rachel Graves was able to get an email from Tony that Jeff sent to Blakespear. We all worked from there. Pam Slater knows who own EU, so we used this to secretly attack Jeff as much as we can. Our goal, was to keep attacking and attacking and attacking, with the hopes that he would slip. It looks like he did slip, but that was way after the election.
Susan and Pam both knew Tony was going to win and didn't care. There was no way that they were going to allow a stupid surfer to get in between them and their desire for power. I think everybody knows that Cindy wasn't behind anything, she was encouraged to run for office the previous Summer.
I wish Susan and Pam's attacks on the Morrises would stop. Kim is a very nice person, and Jeff is a bit intense. That being said, they are good people who have contributed a lot to the community. I didn't think Jeff was Mayor material, but I don't hate him. He's a good guy but he is too much like Trump.
Susan and Pam went after the Morrises with all guns blazing. I feel this was fair during the election, but I never expected them to continue even until now. I know Susan and Pam are savoring the fact the Jeff has some family issues going on right now, but who cares? I am pretty sure his short lived political career is over.
And keep inventing facts.
Delete2:20 Want to explain how Susan and Pam set up Morris to end up with 3 felonies? Is that their fault too? BTW, for those interested Jeff's trial is Monday and you can watch from home if you so desire.
Delete2:20 I was part of Cindy’s team for awhile and this is exactly what I experienced. However I have to add that Vivian Vail was a huge part of this as well. Susan Turney followed by Vail then Price.
DeleteI didn’t see Price get that involved with the Morris thing, but Turney, Vail and Cremona were relentless as was Natalie Settoon and Rachel Graves. I know because we had a lot of discussions about this.
Election time is fair game, but after it should stop. I’ve spoken to Morris quite a few times since and I can tell you with absolutely certainty that they are not on EU anymore! That’s a fact!
Keep trying to divert the attention off of LG and NF. Marco is next!
ReplyDelete2:20 Your story does not make any sense, since Pam/Susan were against a Tony win and were supporting a Cindy win! Many of the campaign issues originated from “someone” that knew about Jeff’s letter to Cb and his application for the Democratic Party support. Craig campion told them that he was the one that wrote and distributed the letter to their community not Cindy! The next door issue was shown to the Morrises confirming that Cindy was not an admin and not responsible for his comments deletions. He had both names of the admin to write or speak to and confirm who was responsible for deleting his comments. That is 4 down with the no-show option to the American Legion debate. Should she have shown up? I don’t know, but at that point she was just trying to not get into any arguments with Jeff and was focusing on her side of the street.
ReplyDeleteI live on the other side of Saxony from the Morrises in Channel Islands. Cindy and some other girl were 100% the admins at that point. I know this for certain because I checked. Jeff wasn't lying, and Cindy was removed by Nextdoor.
DeleteYou can't blame him or any other candidate for not wanting their opponent to be admin. It's not here nor there, but how about we recognize the elections are over?
3:57, I wish I could believe you, but I can’t as I was there. I saw what Cindy, Susan and Vivian did, the plans they made and vitriol they spread about people who didn’t align with them. It was ugly and a big reason I left Cindy’s team.
DeleteI don't think people should be talking for Jeff and Cindy. Jeff talks to much, and Cindy has never says a word. They cancel each other out. It's time to let those two run off together in the sunset.
DeleteI wrote that post. I never met Vivianne and she was not on my group emails or texts. Susan Turney and Pam Slater had the media connections, the experience, and ran the entire show. Cindy stopped talking to them and several other people who were becoming toxic on her team.
Delete4:10 and 4:13 same person same writing style.
Delete4:19, how could 4:10 and 4:13 be the same person, they’re literally contradicting each other!
DeleteI meant 4:13 and 4:15!
DeleteOk that’s better.
DeleteMost of the evidence is on this Encinitas Undercover. Just go back and read everything they said and did about the Morrises. It's ridiculous, and it's why nobody runs for office. It's tough enough to win against the Progressive power hold on our town. It's impossible when the town turns on itself.
DeleteYes 4:13 and 4:15 same person.
DeleteYou ever wonder why as soon as you people start going after Cindy, Susan and Vivian all the Stan and Penguin posts halt. That’s because it’s coming from them, unless you think Mali and Amanda are behind it.
Here’s a solution whenever we start hearing Penguin and Stan bashing that seems to take over the entire thread, start bashing Susan, Cindy,Vivian Vail, Amanda and Mali.
That seems to do the trick, like Shooting fish in a barrel.
4:27 Wow! You must be a phenomenal psychic. Can we hire you? Who is Penguin and Stan?
DeleteYou can thank Cindy, Susan, Mali, Amanda Zelick, Vivian Vail, Lou Caldia, Glenn Johnson, Barb Bolton, Joan Dodge, John Gjata and Garvin for turning this town against itself. These people have done nothing but gossip and spread rumors.
Delete4:30 Don't forget about Tony, Joy, Kellie, the appointee, and Marco. Did I miss anybody?
DeleteI’ll take that as a compliment. It doesn’t take a genius to see who’s doing this and why!
DeleteYou’d have to have been on this site for awhile to recognize this.
4:33 The only person on this site constantly is Christie Dean. Is that you? She is part of the Natalie, Rachel, and Christie "Hate On The Morrises" show.
DeleteThree very angry women, Cindy Cremona, Susan Turney and Vivian Veil are the big reasons why we keep hearing about Stan and Kim.
DeleteUpset and miserable women who are trying to erase their embarrassing past!
Oh, Christie Dean. I forgot about her. What a nutjob.
Delete4:36, Christie Dean has a full time job and kids she’s taking care of. She doesn’t have the luxury to be on here all day. It’s not her!
DeleteStan is Jeff and penguin is Kim? I don't get it.
DeleteLorena Gonzales and Nathan Fletcher are trash! Here’s what a 3 judges on panel had to say about Lorena.
DeleteRegarding Lorena Gonzalez, the panel of Judges had this to say:
“Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
These are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020.
The Ninth Circuit issued its unanimous decision, stating:
“The plausibility of Plaintiffs’ allegations is strengthened by the piecemeal fashion in which the exemptions were granted, and lends credence to Plaintiffs’ allegations that the exemptions were the result of ‘lobbying’ and ‘backroom dealing’ as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation.”
4:09 and 4:10 Okay, since I was not there, and I am not going to chase the next-door admins to confirm if Cindy was removed, or if it was as she claims, that she was never an admin, or on the welcome team. I agree there was some other info going around about Jeff and Tony that was ugly. One story was that Tony had sexually harassed a city staff worker. It never went anywhere. Jeff's old arrest record was brought forth, due to an encounter with a guy that he had years ago. No one cared. I hope that we can put this to rest, but I doubt that will happen.
DeleteNothing like an afternoon of entertainment reading all the “pile on” posts from the Watchdog crowd about Jeff’s imaginary “Team Cindy”, then you all switch to the people who don’t align with your political bent because they didn't support Jeff. What are you all going to do when you run out of people to blame for Jeff’s failure as a candidate? Oh that’s right you all will make up and promote more lies about everyone to post here on EU. I give Jeff credit for his one success he got you all to buy into his delusional story about who was harassing him.
DeleteBoring…💤
ReplyDeleteDef of Stan - Repetitive boring Pycho 🐧 beater
Lorena Gonzales and Nathan Fletcher are trash! Here’s what a 3 judges on panel had to say about Lorena.
DeleteRegarding Lorena Gonzalez, the panel of Judges had this to say:
“Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
These are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020.
The Ninth Circuit issued its unanimous decision, stating:
“The plausibility of Plaintiffs’ allegations is strengthened by the piecemeal fashion in which the exemptions were granted, and lends credence to Plaintiffs’ allegations that the exemptions were the result of ‘lobbying’ and ‘backroom dealing’ as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation.”
See, I told you that was Jeff!
ReplyDelete4:27- BS
ReplyDeleteWell, Bruce is not perfect. He’s pretty darn honest and straight up. I fully support him and I don’t even agree with him on everything. But you don’t see the town attacking him. It’s because he has integrity. He owns his opinions and decisions. And takes accountability for his actions.
Unlike Cindy, right?
DeleteStan is a wife beater!
ReplyDeleteFrom the article: “The court’s brutal indictment of AB 5 hinged on Gonzalez’s “shocking statements,” tweets, and disparaging remarks against Uber, et al. One such statement (cited in the plaintiff’s complaint) was when Gonzalez called Uber’s chief legal officer Tony West (aka Kamala Harris’s brother-in-law) “full of shit” on September 18, 2019 — the same day Gov. Gavin Newsom signed AB 5 into law.” Just like she told Elon Musk!
ReplyDeleteReal classy Lorena! Just like your classless husband!
Well at least Stan isn’t a Pedofile like Nathan Fletcher groping young college girls!
ReplyDeleteOh how nice Stan didn’t eat a human being like Jeffrey Dahmer isn’t that great?
DeleteStan is a 🐧 beater.
That’s BS and low form of human and deserves everything he gets.
Nathan Fletcher will be using his campaign contributions to pay for his legal fees.
DeleteWhat do you think Marco, your brother and sister are big turd like you or what?
Is Marco going to represent his sister?
ReplyDeleteI doubt Marco would represent his sister!
DeleteAlthough I was pissed to hear that Nathan will be using his campaign contributions to pay his legal fees.
Nathan Fletcher will be using his campaign contributions to pay for his legal fees. What do you think Marco, is your brother a big turd like you or what?
ReplyDeleteYou cannot let Encinitas get away from backroom dealings, and then charge Lorena. They all need to pay the price!
ReplyDeleteThere appears to be some repetition going on here with the same posts being repeated. I guess we can't blame everything on the morons.
ReplyDeleteThen again, they do seem to endlessly repeat their postings ad nauseam. Are they now jumping on Nathan and Lorena? We can all agree on something. Who woulda thunk it?
I’m the one make the repetitive posts about Lorena and Nathan.
DeleteEvery time I see a post about Stan and his court case or someone referring to his wife as a penguin, I’ll post the same Fletcher and Gonzalez.
My thought is, whoever is trying to create a war between the Morris and Cindy group is doing so as a distraction. Well, we obviously know it’s a distraction. Team Cindy and Morris each have a common enemy, it’s the one thing they have in common. The Progressive Party, Fletcher, Gonzalez and the likes.
So consistently posting about Fletcher and Gonzalez should drive a wedge in between all of this. Or if you can’t beat ‘em join ‘em in the repetition until someone steps in and says NO MORE!
5:42 Very well said! I admire and commend your intelligence, and your thought process.
DeleteNathan Fletcher will be using his campaign contributions to pay for his legal fees.
ReplyDeleteWhat do you think Marco, your brother a big turd like you or what?
With Stan's propensity to attack objects involving holidays, has anyone reached out to the Easter Bunny to remind him to be on high alert while visiting the Morris household?
ReplyDeleteDID YOU HEAR!!!
DeleteLorena Gonzalez just lost her trial!
AB 5 has been repealed and is no longer with Legislation.
MTS is being investigated for abuse on an employee and Nathan Fletcher is going to jail with Lorena Gonzalez.
Marco is probably next with his quid pro quo dealings with Blakespear for his developer buddies.
The judges on the panel had this to say about LORENA GONZALEZ….
ReplyDelete“Because of Gonzalez’s blatant “animus not based in reason” directed at the plaintiffs, the Ninth Circuit also concluded that AB 5 plausibly violates the equal protection clause under the 14th Amendment.
Hey Marco, your sister and brother are to jail for their behavior, do you think you and Coast Law Group are next?
ReplyDelete*going
ReplyDeleteI’m sure the 3 Jail Birds will have a nice song to sing 🎶
ReplyDeleteLink for Monday’s hearing?
ReplyDeleteNathan Fletcher Gonzalez’s will probably be pretty soon.
DeleteLorena already had her hearing and she lost miserably.
When is Marco Gonzalez’s hearing?
Maybe Marco and Stan can carpool to court together?
ReplyDeleteI don’t like wife beaters.
ReplyDeleteCollege students are adults. Someone that harasses an adult isn't a pedophile, but they are jerks abusing their power.
DeleteIs Stan gay?
ReplyDelete-Mayor Todd Glory-hole
11:15- is today Easter?
DeleteYou have your answer.
11:15 - Are 🐧 and 🎄two of Stan's favorite punching bags?
DeleteIs this Colton Bowers, of La Costa Canyon High School, mother?
DeleteMaybe Colton Bowers needs to be taken to the principle’s office to realize his mother is the one starting issues with people at high school? Isn’t that how his mother works? Did Colton Bowers decide to jump other kids, or did Colton Bowers mother make up one of her CRACK induced stories. Didn’t Colton Bowes mother say, “This is why our kids beefed?”
DeleteColton Bowers needs to realize his mother is unstable, not well, mentally ill, and it’s her who is the problem, not Colton Bower’s classmates.
It could be time to contact Child Protective Services to check up on Colton Bower to make sure he’s safe? His mother is not well.
DeleteWow, nice. Easter cheer from the 🐧
DeleteHappy Easter!
Let’s find Colton Bowers social media sites and find out if this is his mother.
DeleteLet’s leave the kids out of it especially in print. There is no low for you is there?
DeleteI think Monday there needs to be a school intervention. Colton's mother is using him to start fights, intimidate, and try to harm other kids because of his mother's obsessive behavior.
DeleteGuess what? I happen to know a kid that Colton Bower tried to jump, he has all of the information we need to out this troublemaker family. I think considering the circumstances, when CPS is contacted, they will make a determination if action should be taken against Colton Bower's mother. A year of documented harassing? That, plus connections, is enough to show Colton shouldn't be at a school where he's harassing other children, because his mom is not well.
DeleteCOLTON BOWER'S MOM IS ENDANGERING CHILDREN!
Delete“Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
DeleteThese are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020.
Guess what 9:21? You are posting anonymously, so who you claim you know means nothing. You are making the claim so put up your name and who you “know” or shut up Leave the kids out of this. On both sides.
ReplyDeleteSides? There's no "both" sides, there's just you. There's something wrong with you, and your psychotic behavior, your psychotic actions, to try to inflict harm for "no reason" whatsoever, is concerning.
DeleteYou were never a target of anybody. You had a stupid thought that you were somehow a victim of an issue between two people - which you weren't, you sold yourself into believing the lies that you made up, you ran with those lies as if you had some justifiable reason, and you've tried to inflict nonstop harm for a year.
November 8th, has come and gone along time ago. It's time for you to realize that. You devised plans to "harm someone" based upon fabrication, bullying, and psychotic OCD. Think for one second, put the shoe on the other foot, and look at the "entire picture," should Colton Bower's mom continue her psychotic episode and continue harassing, Colton continue harassing, people who have a right to enjoy their community and life?
Nobody ever did anything to you. You instigated 100% of everything, so you don't have any right to pretend you're a victim. You have been the aggressor, slanderer, libeler, liar, and you've also committed perjury. You did all of this for what? Because you do NOT believe someone has a right to talk about what happened to them by a group of crazy women during an election?
Nobody did anything to you. Nobody did anything to me in my own household. On the other hand, you have committed some major atrocities on a family in a quest to cause maximum harm to them, their children, their relationship with people they know? WTF is wrong with you?
The school, CPS, and children who bully others, will be taken directly to the principle's office tomorrow. When you harm kids, like you've done to others and are doing to your own by encouraging them to fight other kids on your behalf, no stopping of the harassment at any point, calls for tough measures.
The election ended 4 months ago but your harassment, false accusations, fake TRO's, fake Civil Harassment filings, and pretending you are "in the middle" of someone's campaign "and" their personal family issues, gives rightful reasons for one to be concerned about their safety. Furthermore, it shows an insight in to the psychotic mind of a deeply disturbed individual who has already demonstrated they are a danger to others.
Maybe it's time to think about your children and what is best for them, rather than constantly harass other families to get your JOLLIES off. In other words, it's time for you to move on because both the schools and law enforcement are aware of your son's actions, but now it's time for them to realize that the "MOTHER" is behind everything.
Go be a mom and leave other families alone. If not, those other families will defend themselves and those families know EVERYBODY in town, especially families with lots of children, children who have lots of friends, and those children's friends who WILL be warned about a psychotic woman living in a trailer who can't stop her obsession over someone who did NOTHINING to her, someone she doesn't know, someone's kid she doesn't know.
It's time to stop your OCD, and focus on your life other than someone else's. Otherwise we'll see what happens in school with the proper authorities. They've already got about 3 warnings? That's enough to get the ball rolling for an investigation to find out what is wrong with you.
Are you beginning to get the point?
Children and their names should not be posted on here. Where is the Admins?
ReplyDeleteI believe there are better ways to handle family disputes than causing corporal injury and illegal restraint.
ReplyDeleteComment with irrelevant copy/paste about the Fletcher/Gonzales family if you agree.
The boy is a minor wtf is wrong with you? You know you’re not helping your pal Morris. The more you post, the worse he looks.
ReplyDeleteBy Stan/Penguin posting about a minor just shows how much they're stressing about tomorrow. I'll be tuning in. One more day.
ReplyDeleteRegarding Lorena Gonzalez, the panel of Judges had this to say:
Delete“Corruption.” “Backroom dealing.” “Pure spite.” “Naked favoritism.”
These are the words written by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to describe former Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez’s bad behavior when crafting her anti-independent contractor law AB 5 (Assembly Bill 5), enacted in January 2020.
The Ninth Circuit issued its unanimous decision, stating:
“The plausibility of Plaintiffs’ allegations is strengthened by the piecemeal fashion in which the exemptions were granted, and lends credence to Plaintiffs’ allegations that the exemptions were the result of ‘lobbying’ and ‘backroom dealing’ as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation.”
There's not going to be "one more day," there's going to be intervention and continuance. Colton Bowers is NOT going to like that the entire school is talking about his psychotic mom, and the school is not going to like what Colton Bower's mom is doing. It will 100% absolutely warrant a CPS call.
DeleteDon't think so? We'll call today.
"I hope my cell mate is tall dark and handsome"
ReplyDelete-Stan
And what would you do if your cell mate was Nathan Fletcher or Marco Gonzalez?
DeleteIf your female would you be excited to have Lorena Gonzalez as your prison bunk mate? I bet she’s hot if she shed about 250 lbs.
DeleteMarco just deleted his comment, see above where it says “Author deleted comment” that was Marco’s. I have screenshot of it.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately I can’t post it on here.
It read, “I respect Nathan immensely! He is a great role model for Supervisor, husband and father. Yes he slept around with all sorts of women, it’s not his fault it was his PTSD and alcohol abuse’s fault. As soon as he finishes treatment, I hope that he’ll decide to continue to run for Senate. He’s truly a family and my hero.”
PS. Nathan’s got a great ass, so maybe when I end up going to jail we can be cell mates.
How incredibly demonic you must you be to wake up on Easter Sunday morning and post about a child and admit to stalking a child’s social media!?
ReplyDeleteIt’s just the Nathan Fletcher and Lorena Gonzalez supporters, they like children just like Nathan and Lorena do.
Delete10:10 Right on. This is the mob mentality that surrounds the guy.
DeleteFor those posting against a minor thinking they're helping Morris might want to check first with his attorney: https://www.paulneuharth.com/, (619) 231-0401. In less than 24 hours Morris will be in the hot seat and you might not want to make things worse for him than they already are. Or not, just a thought.
ReplyDeleteI think you mean the Fletcher and Gonzalez supporters!
ReplyDeleteI mean both sides. Don't you?
DeleteYes both sides! Do you think Fletcher and Gonzalez swingers?
DeleteDon't know don't care.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how Easter is going for the Gonzalez family! Now kids, if you wanna cheat on your wife don’t do it with young college girls that are under 18. Or at least don’t get caught.
ReplyDelete